10.1002/cbic.201900490
ChemBioChem
COMMUNICATION
reaction, and the conversion yield of 2 to 7 was 45%. Interestingly,
a small amount of 8, equivalent to 6% of the substrate, was
detected. These observations lead to the hypothesis that the
affinity of Med-7 for 10 could be lower than those of ActVA-5 and
Gra-21. Thus, Med-7 releases 10 immediately after C-6
hydroxylation, and the second hydroxylation reaction does not
take place.
coupling, the last step in ACT biosynthesis. Recently, we
established an in vitro reconstitution system using recombinant
ACT biosynthetic enzymes to produce 3.[9] In S. coelicolor, an
enoylreductase encoded by actVI-ORF2 converts
3
stereospecifically to 2 (Scheme 1). [7, 8] Our ongoing studies are
dealing with the functional expression of ActVI-2 to connect the
earlier pathway to the present ActVA-5/ActVB system to
reconstitute at least 25 steps from malonyl-CoA, covering the
entire ACT biosynthetic pathway except for dimerization.
These functional differences between ActVA-5 and Med-7
should also be derived from the distinct structural determinants of
substrate recognition. Modeling studies were extended to Gra-21
and Med-7 (Figure S22, 23), followed by the docking simulation
of 2 and 10. A marked difference was observed for the residues
in the vicinity of ligand pockets (Figure S24). The sets of two
aligned residues (227R and 314R/ActVA-5; 255K and 336R/Gra-21;
227K and 313R/Med-7) are particularly of interest. The two arginine
residues of ActVA-5 (Figure S25), which function as a proton-
donor to an anionic form of 2, tightly accommodate a substrate.
The same role would be undertaken by the single residue:
255K/Gra-21 (Figure S26) and 358S/Med-7 (Figure S27). It is
noteworthy that 358S/Med-7 is distantly positioned from
227R/ActVA-5 and 255K/Gra-21 in both the alignment and the
models of the three related proteins (Figure S24). The Med-7
structure seems to form an apparently looser catalytic pocket for
2 (Figure S27) and 10 (Figure S28) than those of ActVA-5 (Figure
S25) and Gra-21 (Figure S26). This difference could be explained
by the lack of pi-stacking (234F/ActVA-5, 262F/Gra-21, 234L/Med-7)
Two-component FMOs homologous to the ActVA-5/ActVB
system are widely distributed in bacteria (Figure S29, Table S3,
S4). This work demonstrated that a flavin reductase, ActVB,
apparently regulates the interconversion between the
naphthoquinone and hydronaphthoquinone form of ACT
biosynthetic intermediates. This observation agrees with the
recent finding of the importance of hydronaphthoquinone in
biosynthesis,[18] and our results would provide an example of the
general biosynthetic mechanism of highly functionalized aromatic
natural products such as polyphenols and polymeric aryl
compounds.
In conclusion, the ActVA-5/ActVB system provides a previously
uncharacterized example of the hydroxylation of a polycyclic
aromatic compound catalyzed by a two-component FMO.
and hydrophobic
(
122M/ActVA-5, 147M/Gra-21, 120A/Med-7)
interactions (Figure S25-S27) with a ligand molecule, which would
contribute to the difference in turnover of a substrate and/or FNM,
accounting for the mono-functionality of Med-7.
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. Y. Kanai, Mr. K. Maru, and Ms. E. Hoshi, Faculty of
Pharmacy, Musashino University for their assitance in
experiments. We also thank Mr. Yoshirou Kimura, Molsis Inc. for
helpful discussion. This work was supprted by JSPS KAKENHI
Grant Number JP17K08350 (to TT) and JP19H03385 (to KI).
Cnflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: aromatic hydroxylation• biosynthesis• flavin-
dependent monooxygenase• actinorhodin • reaction mechanisms
[1]
[2]
S.K. Krueger, D.E. Williams, Pharmacol. Ther., 2005, 106, 357-387.
Y. Zhao, S.K. Christensen, C.Fankhauser, J.R. Cashman, J.D. Cohen,
D. Weigel, J. Chory, Science, 2001, 291, 306-309.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
J.-K. Suh, L.L. Poulsen, D.M. Ziegler, J.D. Robertus, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 2687-2691.
Figure 3. THK-OH production activities of ActVA-5, Med-7, and Gra-21 from 2
with ActVB as a FMN reductase (means ±S. E., n = 3)
M.M.E. Huijbers , S. Montersino, A.H. Westphal, D. Tischler, W.J.H. van
Berkel, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2014, 544, 2-17.
T. Heine, W.J.H. van Berkel, G. Gassner, K.-H.van Pée, D. Tischler,
Biology 2018, 7, 42; doi:10.3390/biology7030042
We successfully established a semisynthetic procedure for
preparing 2 and 6 from a biosynthetic intermediate 3 and an assay
condition to achieve two consecutive hydroxylations at C-6 and
C-8 of 2 to produce 8. The bifunctionality of ActVA-5 indicated by
in vivo analysis[7] was unambiguously proved by in vitro analysis.
Time-course analysis suggests that the stepwise recognition
mechanism would be supported. The fact that 2 is converted to 8
by ActVA-5/ActVB supports our previous proposal[11] that 11
would be a substrate for dimerization by regiospecific aryl-
V. Weichold, D. Milbredt, K.-H. van Pee, Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed.,
2016, 55, 6374-6389.
a) T. Taguchi, M. Yabe, H. Odaki, M. Shinozaki, M. Metsä-Ketelä, T. Arai,
S. Okamoto, K. Ichinose, Chem. Biol., 2013, 20, 510-520; b) S. Okamoto,
T. Taguchi, K. Ochi, K. Ichinose, Chem. Biol., 2009, 16, 226-236.
T. Taguchi, S. Okamoto, T. Itoh, Y. Ebizuka, K. Ochi, K. Ichinose,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49, 1208-1211.
[8]
[9]
T. Taguchi, T. Awakawa, Y. Nishihara, M. Kawamura, Y. Ohnishi, K.
Ichinose, ChemBioChem., 2017, 18, 316-323.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.