Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
2
4 h (or to the authentic monoazide complex for control, see
reports of this reaction supports this assignment for complex
the Supporting Information) did not change the chemical
shifts or the integrals of the spectra, thus confirming that the
remaining azide group is inaccessible to the reducing agent.
The striking ability of the cavitand to suppress the rapid
interconversion of the two ends of the molecule in and out of
the cavitand once one azide has been reduced to an amine
rationalizes the excellent selectivity afforded by the chaper-
one.
I. Build up of this intermediate may be responsible for the
poor material balance based solely on diazide and mono-
amine during the early part of the reaction. As shown in
Figure 4, the kinetic model based on Equations (1) and (2)
provides a good fit to the temporal concentration data for the
substrate and product, thus allowing an estimate of the
temporal concentration of the presumed iminophosphorane
[
5]
intermediate.
Figure 4 shows the kinetic profile of the reaction of the C12
diazide within cavitand, taken from integration of the NMR
time course data in Figure 3. Rapid consumption of the
diazide to form an intermediate species suggested to be an
iminophosphorane is followed by quantitative conversion into
the monoamine product in less than three hours, with no
formation of the diamine product observed.
Similar results were obtained with the C10 diazide; nearly
quantitative yields were observed for the monoamine. An
accurate determination of the distribution of the molecular
species was not possible with the shorter diazide (C ). The
8
resonances of the guests became broadened after addition of
the phosphine. Nevertheless, integration of the monoamine
signals in the NMR spectrum after 24 h reaction gave a rough
estimate, with the yield around 50–60% (see the Supporting
Information). The deeper complex formed by the C diazide
8
(Figure 2) compared to C10 or C12 diazides could explain its
lowered reactivity toward PMe in solution.
3
Control experiments (without cavitand) were performed
both with diazides using [D ]2-propanol as cosolvent and with
8
the monoreduced azide in D O. The reaction outcomes were
2
1
monitored by H NMR spectroscopy (the Supporting Infor-
mation). In the absence of the cavitand, diazides and
monoaminoazides are both converted quantitatively into the
diamines, without any traces of the monoamine product,
again highlighting the striking ability of the cavitand to
suppress the second reduction step.
Table 1 summarizes the rate constants determined from
kinetic modeling studies of the reactions using COPASI
Figure 4. Product distribution and kinetic model curves for the reduc-
tion of diazide C12 with cavitand 1. Open circles represent experimental
data from three runs; lines represent the kinetic model of Equa-
[
5]
software with and without cavitand. Comparison of the
values of k to k ’ and k to k ’ supports the hypothesis that the
1
1
2
2
[
5]
tions (1) and (2).
kinetics of the sequential reaction of azide to amine is similar
with and without the cavitand, and the primary role of the
cavitand is to suppress the onward reaction of the monoamine
to the diamine product.
The sequential reaction can be modeled from the
experimental data according to Equations (1) and (2).
Formation of an intermediate (rate constant k ) precedes its
1
Table 1: Rate constants derived from kinetic modeling of the sequential
reactions according to Equations (1) and (2).
hydrolysis (rate constant k ) to the monoamine product. A
[a]
2
second sequential reaction converting the monoamine into
Substrate
Diazide with cavitand
Monoamine without cavitand
the diamine product (with k ’ and k ’) occurs only in the
1
2
[b]
[b]
[b]
[b]
k1
k2
k ’
k ’
2
1
absence of the cavitand.
C12
C10
C8
36.4
26.6
–
0.026
0.029
–
30.4
13.4
13.1
0.032
0.044
0.045
k1
k2
diazide ! intermediate ! monoamine
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
[
c]
[c]
0
0
2
k
1
k
[5]
monoamine ! intermediate ! diamine
[a] Modeling studies carried out using COPASI software. [b] Units of
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
rate constants are M
h . [c] k and k for diazide C with cavitand could
1 2 8
not be calculated because of inaccurate integration measurements of the
NMR spectrum.
The function of the cavitand may be thought of as
a loosely held blocking group: once the first reduction step
occurs, the cavitand suppresses the rapid equilibration of the
two ends of the molecules, thus hiding the second azide site
and thereby altering the reaction product selectivity. The
formation and build up of the intermediate iminophosphor-
ane is not directly observed due to interference from other
signals in the NMR spectra of complex I under the reaction
conditions. However, the observation of signals attributed to
the iminophosphorane in the solution reaction (see the
Supporting Information) and consideration of literature
A variety of contorted alkane shapes are observed in
[
6]
closed systems such as capsules and open-ended systems
[7]
[8]
such as cyclodextrins and cucurbiturils. In earlier studies,
we used the folded conformations that bring the guest ends
close together to promote macrolactamization reactions in
[
9]
cavitands. Here, the cavitand plays a complementary and
contrasting role by inhibiting the further reactions of a folded
guest; this overcomes a general problem of the monofunc-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!