LETTER
Reaction of Amphipathic-Type Thioester and Amine in Water
2037
(
6) Kurooka, S.; Hashimoto, M.; Tomita, M.; Maki, A.;
R
H2O
n-C11H23
O
R
Yoshimura, Y. J. Biochem. 1976, 79, 533.
O
6
+
–1 1
H2N
n-C6H13
O
(7) Compound 7: IR (KBr): 1684, 1566, 1425 cm . H NMR as
N
n-C6H13
carboxylic acid (CDCl ): d = 0.88 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.21–
O
H
3
O
1.37 (m, 6 H), 1.59–1.70 (m, 2 H), 2.55 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H),
1
0a–d
1
1a–d
13
2
.69 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.11 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H). C NMR
as carboxylic acid (CDCl ): d = 14.0, 22.4, 23.5, 25.5, 28.6,
3
Scheme 4
3
1.4, 34.2, 44.0, 177.2, 199.3. MS (FAB): m/z = 263 [M +
+
+
+
Na] , 241 [M + H] . HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H] calcd for
Table 4 Amidation of Thioester 6 with Some Hydrophobic Amino
C H O NaS: 241.0874; found: 241.0865.
1
0
18
3
Acid Hexyl Estersa
(8) Dellaria, J. F. Jr.; Nordeen, C.; Swett, L. R. Synth. Commun.
986, 16, 1043.
9) Typical Procedure for the Amidation Reaction: Thioester
(0.065 mmol) was added to a stirred mixture of amine 3
0.13 mmol) in H O (5 mL), and the mixture was stirred at
1
Entry
Substrate R (parent amino acid)
Product Yield (%)b
(
6
1
2
3
10a
10b
10c
10d
Me CH (valine)
11a
11b
11c
11d
69
61
83c
73
2
(
2
r.t. for 24 h. The mixture was extracted with Et O, and the
Me CHCH (leucine)
2
2
2
ethereal layer was washed with aq NaHCO solution, and
3
MeEtCH (isoleucine)
Bn (phenylalanine)
dried over Na SO . After evaporation of the solvent, the
2
4
product was purified by silica gel column chromatography
using hexane–EtOAc as eluent.
4
(
10) (a) Iimura, S.; Manabe, K.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Commun.
002, 94. (b) Bodanszky, M. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1984,
23, 111.
a
All the reactions were carried out at 70 °C for 18 h. Molar ratio of 6/
0 = 1:2.
Isolated yield.
Epimerization was not observed.
2
1
b
c
(11) An aqueous solution of NaOH (0.5 M, 0.26 mL) was added
in the reaction of 8 triflate (0.13 mmol) with 6 (0.065 mmol).
(
12) Compound 9a: mp 60–61 °C. IR (KBr): 3315, 1739, 1647,
–
1 1
1
3
1
2
552, 1213 cm . H NMR (CDCl ): d = 0.88 (t, J = 7.0 Hz,
Similarly, hydrophobic amino acid hexyl esters 10a–d
were acylated to afford the corresponding amides 11a–
3
H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.23–1.39 (m, 22 H), 1.55–
.69 (m, 4 H), 2.24 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 4.04 (d, J = 5.0 Hz,
1
4–17
d
in good yields (Scheme 4 and Table 4). These re-
13
H), 4.15 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 5.94 (br, 1 H). C NMR
sults suggest that amphipathic-type thioester is a useful
acylating agent of amino acid derivative in water. The
lower reactivity of amino acid derivative, in comparison
to alkylamine, is probably due to low nucleophilicity of
the amino group. The pKa value of the amino group in
amino acid is generally lower than that in alkylamine.
(
2
CDCl ): d = 14.0, 14.1, 22.5, 22.7, 25.4, 25.6, 28.4, 29.2,
3
9.3 (2 × C), 29.4, 29.6 (2 × C), 31.3, 31.9, 36.4, 41.3, 65.7,
+
170.3, 173.2. EIMS: m/z = 341 [M ], 201, 118. HRMS: m/z
[M + H] calcd for C20
+
H40NO : 342.3008; found: 342.3002.
3
(
13) Compound 9b: mp 45–46 °C. IR (KBr): 3296, 1732, 1639,
–
1 1
1
3
552, 1186 cm . H NMR (CDCl ): d = 0.88 (t, J = 6.7 Hz,
3
H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.22–1.37 (m, 22 H), 1.55–
In conclusion, various chain lengths of amines were acy-
lated by amphipathic thioester 6 or 7 in water. The yields
of the amides were dependent primarily on the chain
length of the thioester. In contrast to the previous method
1.69 (m, 4 H), 2.15 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.53 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2
H), 3.52 (q, J = 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 4.09 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.07
1
3
(
2
3
br, 1 H). C NMR (CDCl ): d = 14.0, 14.1, 22.5, 22.7, 25.6,
3
5.7, 28.5, 29.3 (3 × C), 29.5, 29.6 (2 × C), 31.4, 31.9, 34.0,
+
4.7, 36.8, 173.0, 173.2. EIMS: m/z = 355 [M ], 215, 132.
5
using S-alkylthioester 1 or 2, amides were successfully
+
HRMS: m/z [M + H] calcd for C H NO : 356.3165;
2
1
42
3
synthesized from hydrophilic short-chain amines. The
present method will be useful in the acylation of amines in
water.
found: 356.3134.
14) Compound 11a: oil. IR (NaCl): 3307, 1736, 1651, 1539,
(
–
1 1
1198 cm . H NMR (CDCl ): d = 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H),
3
0
.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.94 (d,
J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.22–1.39 (m, 22 H), 1.59–1.69 (m, 4 H),
2.10–2.21 (m, 1 H), 2.23 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 4.07–4.18 (m,
References and Notes
2
1
2
3
3
3
H), 4.58 (dd, J = 4.6, 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.94 (br d, J = 9.0 Hz,
(
1) (a) Organic Reactions in Water; Lindström, U. M., Ed.;
Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, 2007. (b) Li, C.-J. Chem.
Rev. 1993, 93, 2023. (c) Li, C.-J.; Chen, L. Chem. Soc. Rev.
1
3
H). C NMR (CDCl ): d = 14.0, 14.1, 17.7, 18.9, 22.5,
3
2.7, 25.6, 25.7, 28.5, 29.2, 29.3 (2 × C), 29.5, 29.6 (2 × C),
1.3, 31.4, 31.9, 36.8, 56.8, 65.4, 172.4, 173.0. EIMS: m/z =
2
006, 35, 68. (d) Lindström, U. M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102,
+
+
83 [M ], 254. HRMS: m/z [M + H] calcd for C H NO :
2
3
46
3
2751.
84.3478; found: 384.3478.
(
2) (a) Kent, S. B. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 338.
b) Noren, C. J.; Wang, J.; Perler, F. B. Angew. Chem. Int.
(
15) Compound 11b: oil. IR (NaCl): 3288, 1741, 1651, 1543,
(
–
1 1
1
0
192 cm . H NMR (CDCl ): d = 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H),
3
Ed. 2000, 39, 450. (c) Weber, A. L.; Orgel, L. E. J. Mol.
Evol. 1979, 13, 193.
3) Nambu, H.; Hata, K.; Matsugi, M.; Kita, Y. Chem. Eur. J.
.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.94 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3 H), 0.95 (d,
J = 6.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.23–1.39 (m, 23 H), 1.46–1.72 (m, 6 H),
.21 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.12 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2 H), 4.65 (dt,
(
(
2
2005, 11, 719.
1
3
J = 5.0, 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.84 (br d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H). C NMR
4) (a) Kawabata, Y.; Kinoshita, M. Makromol. Chem. 1975,
(
CDCl ): d = 14.0, 14.1, 22.1, 22.5, 22.7, 22.8, 24.9, 25.5,
3
176, 49. (b) Kawabata, Y.; Kinoshita, M. Makromol. Chem.
2
3
2
3
5.6, 28.4, 29.2, 29.3 (2 × C), 29.5, 29.6 (2 × C), 31.3, 31.9,
1
975, 176, 2797. (c) Kawabata, Y.; Kinoshita, M.
+
6.6, 41.9, 50.6, 65.5, 172.8, 173.4. EIMS: m/z = 397 [M ],
Makromol. Chem. 1975, 176, 2807.
+
68, 86. HRMS: m/z [M + H] calcd for C H NO :
2
4
48
3
(
5) Torihata, A.; Kuroda, C. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2010, 83,
98.3634; found: 398.3616.
1534.
Synlett 2011, No. 14, 2035–2038 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York