Upon preparation of the known acetoxypyranone 1a
emerged. First, from the pairwise comparison of structurally
similar bases such as N-methylmorpholine and N-methylpi-
peridine (entries 4,7), it is apparent that the electronic effects
of sterically comparable bases play an important role.
Second, the decreased steric hindrance of bases with similar
(
tricylic ether 2a (75% yield), the mixture was separated via
dr ∼2:1) previously utilized directly by Sammes en route to
5
SiO flash column chromatography to deliver diastereo-
2
1
merically pure (>19:1 as determined by H NMR analysis)
acetoxypyranones anti- and syn-1a (Scheme 2). The rela-
tive stereochemistry of each diastereomer was confirmed
by NOE analysis of syn-1a and X-ray crytallographic
pK values also plays a significant role, which is best
a
illustrated by the increasing conversion trend observed from
N,N-diisopropylethyl amine, triethylamine, N-methylpi-
peridine, NMP, and QUIN (entries 5ꢀ9). Lastly, these
results demonstrate that syn-acetoxypyranone 1a consis-
tently undergoes conversion to tricyclic ether 2a at a
qualitatively faster rate than anti-acetoxypyranone 1a.
7
analysis of the corresponding p-bromobenzoate analog.
For the purposes of this study, the reactivity of each
acetoxypyranone diastereomer was evaluated separately.
Our initial investigation focused on the attempted intra-
molecular cycloaddition of anti- and syn-acetoxypyranone-
enals 1b, which were prepared separately from anti-
and syn-1a via GrubbsꢀHoveyda cross-metathesis with
Table 1. Initial Screening of Amine Bases
8
crotonaldehyde. Although a complex mixture was ob-
9
tained and tricyclic ether 2b could not be isolated, we were
intrigued by the differing rates and product distributions
for each diastereomer. As a result of these initial studies, we
chose to investigate the reactivity of each acetoxypyranone
diastereomer anti- and syn-1a more thoroughly.
anti-1a/2a syn-1a/2a
a
a
entry
base
(% yield) (% yield)
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
none
99/0
88/0
89/5
86/5
62/36
59/41
0/88
0/90
0/81
0/34
93/0
90/2
68/14
68/14
6/80
7/89
0/91
0/95
0/88
0/37
Scheme 2. Attempted Cyclization of Acetoxypyranone-Enals 1b
pyridine
N-methylmorpholine
N,N-diisopropylethyl amine
triethylamine
N-methylpiperidine
N-methylpyrrolidine
quinuclidine
1
0
1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane
1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene
11
a
1
Determined by H NMR analysis utilizing 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene
as the internal standard.
To probe the base dependency, four effective bases
NMP, DABCO, QUIN, and DBU) were subjected to
(
various solvents at ambient temperature (Table 2). It was
determined that QUIN and DBU are the most efficient
bases and that CH Cl and CH CN are the most efficient
2
2
3
solvents (entries 11,12 and 15,16). With these conditions,
both the steric and electronic phenomena were further
validated since QUIN is less hindered than NMP and
DABCO is inductively deactivated compared to QUIN.
Perhaps indicative of the unique reactivity patterns of
1
0
Screening of amine bases at 60 °C in acetonitrile revealed
varying degrees of conversion with N-methylpyrrolidine
DBU, utilizing a single equivalent led to the increased
yield of ether 2a (i.e., Table 1, entry 11vs Table 2, entry 16).
Excess DBU and use of other bases such as imidazole
afforded complex mixtures of unidentified products.
In order to confirm the generality of this qualitative rate
(
(
NMP), quinuclidine (QUIN), 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane
DABCO), and 1,8-diaza-bicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU)
all providing complete consumption of starting acetoxypyr-
anone (Table 1). From this base screen, three clear trends
difference, the same bases were tested in CH CN with an
3
electron-donating alkene (1c) and an electron-withdraw-
7
ing alkene (1d) (Table 3). Although some variation was
(
(
7) See Supporting Information for further details.
8) (a) Movassaghi, M.; Tjandra, M.; Qi, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
exhibited, these conversion results further validate the
general rate enhancement for the syn-acetoxypyranones
1c,d toward cycloadducts 2c,d and the aforementioned
1
31, 9648. (b) Chatterjee, A.; Choi, T.-L.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11360. (c) Cossy, J.; BouzBouz, S.;
Hoveyda, A. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 327. (d) Garber,
S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 8168.
(
quantity of aldehyde 2b with multiple byproducts.
6
steric and electronic trends (vide supra).
1
9) H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures indicated a trace
(10) Aggarwal, V. K.; Mereu, A. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2311.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
B