ACS Catalysis
Research Article
almost no ee. This result is unlikely to be due to any possible
two-point ketone binding to the active site, since we previously
demonstrated that such more rigid two-point versus one-point
binding is not an attribute that leads to higher enantioselec-
tivity.5−7,19,20 It is interesting to note that F ketone entries in
Table 2 show high enantioselectivity despite what we previously
hypothesized to be much weaker F···Al interactions relative to
Cl···Al interactions, and Cl ketones in Table 2 show lower
enantioselectivity.7 The latter hypothesis was based on a
comparative analysis of substituted ketones and their catalytic
activity for MPV reduction, which demonstrated enhanced
catalytic rates for Cl-substituted versus either F- or H-
substituted ketones. The latter two types of ketones showed
similar MPV reduction activity and were inferred to bind
weaker as a result of this.7 Here, when using MPV
enantioselectivity rather than rate as a probe, it is likely that
other factors besides halogen···Al interactions play a role for
causing high enantioselectivity. These could include the
presence of a chiral pocket that is formed by lower-rim
calixarene substituents for catalysts in Table 2. Previously, we
demonstrated that the presence of such a pocket acted to
decrease the MPV reduction rate for bulkier substrates as well
as when using bulky lower-rim substituents.7 If cavity effects are
important, the data in Table 2 suggest that the right sterically
tight fit, which is correlated with lower activity and yield, results
in higher enantioselectivity. Such a result is consistent with the
relatively poor observed MPV reduction activity when using
catalyst 3a and enantioselective recognition in other supra-
molecular host pockets, in which guests binding more tightly
into hosts exhibit a greater degree of stereoselective
discrimination.21
The degree of π-delocalization of the P lone pair was
decreased in DINOL- and TADDOL-derived phosphite
catalysts in entries 5 and 6 of Table 2, respectively, which
both lack direct aryl oxygen-P connectivity in catalysts 3b and
3c, respectively. This delocalization may be important for
electronic transmission of chiral information to the metal
center. Consistent with this and in contrast, VANOL-derived
phosphite catalyst 3d possesses extended π-delocalization, and
this catalyst exhibits both good yield and enantioselectivity in
entry 7 of Table 2. Yet if delocalization is too great, as in (R)-
VAPOL-based catalyst 3e, this may hamper the electronic
communication and results in lower enantioselectivity in entry
8 of Table 2 when using this catalyst relative to 3d.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Corma, A.; Domine, M. E.; Nemeth, L.; Valencia, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 3194−95.
(2) Boronat, S.; Corma, A.; Renz, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110,
21168−74.
(3) Flack, K.; Kitagawa, K.; Pollet, P.; Eckert, C.; Richman, K.;
Stringer, J.; Dubay, W.; Liotta, C. L. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012, 16,
1301−06.
(4) Kiyoharu, N.; Node, M. Chirality 2002, 14, 759−67.
(5) Campbell, E. J.; Nguyen, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
1020−22.
(6) Graves, C. R.; Zhou, H.; Stern, C. L.; Nguyen, S. T. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 9121−4.
(7) Nandi, P.; Matvieiev, Y. I.; Boyko, V. I.; Durkin, K. A.; Kalchenko,
V. I.; Katz, A. J. Catal. 2011, 284, 42−49.
(8) Nandi, P.; Tang, W.; Okrut, A.; Kong, X.; Hwang, S.-J.; Neurock,
M.; Katz, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 2484−89.
(9) Solovyov, A.; Notestein, J. M.; Durkin, K. A.; Katz, A. New J.
Chem. 2008, 32, 1314−1325.
(10) Miller, A. J. M.; Labinger, J. A.; Bercaw, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 3301−3.
(11) Karkamkar, A. J.; Parab, K.; Camaioni, D. M.; Neiner, D.; Cho,
H. M.; Nielsen, T. K.; Autrey, T. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 615−19.
(12) Chase, P. A.; Welch, G. C.; Jurca, T.; Stephan, D. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8050−8053.
(13) Spies, P.; Schwendemann, S.; Lange, S.; Kehr, G.; Frohlich, R.;
Erker, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7543−7546.
(14) Dieleman, C.; Steyer, S.; Jeunesse, C.; Matt, D. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 2001, 2508−2517.
(15) Jeunesse, C.; Dieleman, C.; Steyer, S.; Matt, D. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 2001, 881−886.
(16) Semeril, D.; Matt, D.; Toupet, L. Chem.Eur. J. 2008, 14,
7144−55.
(17) Paciello, R.; Siggel, L.; Roper, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999,
̈
38, 1920−1923.
(18) Ini, S.; Oliver, A. G.; Tilley, T. D.; Bergman, R. G.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 3839−3841.
(19) Ooi, T.; Miura, T.; Maruoka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
2347−2349.
(20) Ooi, T.; Ichikawa, H.; Maruoka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 3610−3612.
In summary, a chiral cavity alone is insufficient for
enantioselective hydride delivery in MPV reduction, when
using chiral Al(III)-calix[4]arene complexes, since catalysts 2a−
2c possessing only a chiral pocket, even a rigidified one as in 2c,
are unable to perform asymmetric MPV reduction, when using
achiral 2-propanol as a hydride donor. The directed lone pair of
the Lewis basic P on the calixarene-phosphite substituent
clearly plays a significant role in direct asymmetric hydride
delivery to a ketone in the absence of a chiral alcohol hydride
donor, when using catalysts 3a−3e. We hypothesize that
directed chirality of the phosphite P works synergistically with
the presence of a chiral hemispherical pocket, as defined by
calix[4]arene lower-rim substituents for directing asymmetric
MPV reduction catalysis.
(21) Fiedler, D.; Leung, D. H.; Bergman, R. G.; Raymond, K. N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3674−75.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
■
S
2495
dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs5001976 | ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 2492−2495