50
Chen Chen et al. / Catalysis Communications 47 (2014) 49–53
Pd1–Au1/LDH (Fig. 2e and f) indicated the presence of metallic form at
the surface of LDH [14]. Also there were shifts of BE between monome-
tallic and bimetallic catalysts. For the Pd1–Au1/LDH catalyst, the BE of Pd
3d5/2 was 0.3 eV higher than that of the Pd1/LDH (334.9 eV), while Au
4f7/2 was 0.4 eV lower than that of the Au1/LDH (83.4 eV). This can be
confirmed further by the fact that if more high loading amount of Au
was employed, Au 4f7/2 signal indeed became sharper and Au 4f7/2 sig-
nal of bimetal Pd2–Au2/LDH (83.1 eV) was 0.5 eV lower than that of
the monometal Au2/LDH (83.6 eV) (Fig. 2S(b)), suggested that there
was electron transfer from Pd to Au atoms [15]. After four one-pot
tandem catalytic cycles, the oxidation state of Pd and Au remained
zero valent with the BE of 340.5 eV (Pd 3d3/2) and 83 eV (Au 4f7/2),
indicating that the bimetallic catalyst was stable under reaction
condition.
Because basicity would play a crucial role in sequential oxidation
and Knoevenagel condensation, CO2-TPD was carried out to exam-
ine the basicity of the catalysts. As seen from the CO2-desorption
curves in Fig. 3, some weak basic centers existed on the surfaces of
LDH-derived catalysts (around 100 °C), while there were only very
few basic sites on γ-Al2O3 supported catalyst. Moreover, a sharp
desorption band observed between 300 °C to 400 °C on LDH-
derived materials could result from the decomposition of the
interlayered carbonate [16]. This was further substantiated by the
pattern of typical TG/DTA (Fig. 3S).
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of LDH (a), Au1/LDH (b), Pd1/LDH (c), and Pd1–Au1/LDH before
reaction (d) and after reaction (e).
selectivity [12]. Furthermore, it could offer the easy approach for
separation of organic products from aqueous phase. Thus, the develop-
ment of the tandem reaction in water is highly desirable. On the basis of
our previous work [7], in this context the efficient bimetal Pd1–Au1/LDH
catalysts have been extended for transforming alcohol and nitriles into
the α, β-unsaturated nitriles through the tandem alcohol oxidation
and Knoevenagel condensation in water.
2.2. The tandem reactions over different catalysts
We employed a simple procedure for one-pot synthesis of α,
β-unsaturated nitriles by LDH-supported catalysts in aqueous
phase (Scheme 1). At first, the tandem reaction between benzyl
alcohol and ethyl cyanoacetate was chosen as model reaction.
From the 1H NMR spectra of products, the trans (E) isomer was
produced exclusively [17]. As displayed in Table 1, the tandem re-
action cannot happen without any catalyst or with only the LDH
support (Table 1, entries 1 and 2), because no metal sites were
available for the oxidation step. Nevertheless, the Pd1–Au1/LDH
catalyst exhibited higher activity than Pd1/LDH or Au1/LDH catalyst
(Table 1, entries 3, 4 and 5) under the same reaction conditions,
which indicated that there was some cooperation interaction
between Pd and Au on the bimetal catalyst [18]. Additionally,
activated carbon could not promote the one-pot reaction due to the
absence of basicity (Table 1, entry 7). Notably, the Pd1–Au1/γ-Al2O3
also exhibited good conversion but the selectivity to α, β-unsaturated
nitriles was lower than that of Pd1–Au1/LDH catalyst due to the
very few weak basic sites on the Pd1–Au1/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, which
did not promote the Knoevenagel condensation efficiently (Table 1,
entry 6). This can be proved from the fact that Pd1–Au1/γ-Al2O3
showed excellent conversion (98%) for the oxidation step, while
it exhibited only 74.3% conversion for the sequential Knoevenagel
condensation. The results revealed that both the base sites and
the metal sites played a crucial role in facilitating the tandem
reaction.
2. Results and discussion
2.1. Catalyst characterization
The LDH structure was firstly identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD).
The Mg-Al LDH exhibited some common features of layered materials.
The (003), (006), (009), (110) and (113) planes are corresponding to
the typical pattern of the LDH without any hydroxide-segregated
phases (Fig. 1a) [7] (JCPDS 22–0700). Moreover, the LDH structure
revealed a high degree of crystallinity and showed no changes after
the introduction of noble metal (Fig. 1b, c and d). Additionally, no
obvious Pd(0) or Au(0) characteristic diffraction peaks [13] over mono-
metallic and bimetallic catalysts was observed (Fig. 1b, c and d), which
was ascribe to the low contents of metals and the small size of the metal
particles. After reaction the Pd1–Au1/LDH catalyst showed similar
diffraction peaks, indicating that the layered structure of LDH remained
intact and the growth of nanoparticles was not obviously observed
(Fig. 1e).
TEM photographs of the size distribution of fresh and reused
Pd1–Au1/LDH catalysts were shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen that
metal particles were highly dispersed on the surface of LDH with
an average size of 2.38
0.3 nm (Fig. 2a, c), which accounted for
2.3. The step in the tandem reaction
the reason why metal particles on the LDH support showed invisible
diffraction peak. After four recycling, the nanoparticles were still well
As discussed above, the first oxidation step could be very critical
for the tandem reaction. As shown in Fig. 4a, it can be seen that
LDH did not afford any activity of alcohol oxidation, and Pd1/LDH
appeared more active than the Au1/LDH, giving about 90% conver-
sion after 1.5 h. Interestingly, Pd1–Au1/LDH catalyst afforded full
conversion under the same reaction conditions, which demonstrat-
ed the superiority of the bimetal catalyst in alcohols oxidation
[7,18]. Meanwhile, the reaction time profiles of Knoevenagel con-
densation between benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate revealed
that the condensation reaction proceeded very rapidly and was
completed at 80 °C within 30 min (Fig. 4b). However, these
dispersed with an average size of 3.12
0.3 nm (Fig. 2b, d), although
a slight growth was observed. Moreover, the Pd1/LDH and Au1/LDH cat-
alysts also exhibited the similar particle size of 2.25 nm (Fig. 1S(a),
1S(b)) and 2.78 nm (Fig. 1S(c), 1S(d)), respectively. In addition,
the γ-Al2O3-supported bimetallic catalyst displayed slightly larger
particle size of 4.38 nm (Fig. 1S(e), 1S(f)).
Additionally, the chemical state and the surface composition of the
catalysts were obtained by XPS analyses. Fig. 2 showed the Pd 3d and
Au 4f spectra for the monometallic and bimetallic catalysts. The binding
energy (BE) of Pd 3d5/2 (345.2 eV) and Au 4f7/2 (83.0 eV) for the bimetal