2
ZHANG ET AL.
subtilis 168 whole cells for efficient production of 2,3‐
butanediol. As far as we know, only a few studies have
reported the whole‐cell biocatalytic process for producing
(S)‐5‐chloro‐1‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐2‐hydroxy‐1H‐indene‐2‐
carboxylic acid methyl ester. Therefore, it would be valu-
able to develop its bioprocess.
FIGURE 1 The structure of indoxacarb
Herein, we aimed to explore a convenient and efficient
bioprocess to obtain (S)‐5‐chloro‐1‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐2‐
hydroxy‐1H‐indene‐2‐carboxylic acid methyl ester by a
newly isolated strain Bacillus cereus WZZ006.
and efficient synthesis, the reactions are still complex,
toxic, and not conducive to large‐scale industrial produc-
tion.9 The purity of the obtained (S)‐5‐chloro‐1‐oxo‐2,3‐
dihydro‐2‐hydroxy‐1H‐indene‐2‐carboxylic acid methyl
ester is only about 90%. McCann et al10 found that the
(S)‐isomer of 54% enantiomeric excess (e.e.) was obtained
with the Sharpless asymmetric hydroxylation reagent
AD‐mix‐β. With the chiral N‐camphorsulfonyl
oxaziridine reagents developed by Davis et al,11 the yield
could be increased to 85%, but the e.e. value was only
35%. Under the condition of using the chiral alkaloid cin-
chonine as a catalyst and tert‐butyl hydroperoxide
(TBHP) as an oxidant,12 85% yield and 50% e.e. were
obtained. The level of e.e. directly affects the quality of
the final product and the activity of pesticides,13-15 so
exploring its new synthetic method has a long‐term appli-
cation significance.
2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 | General
Indoxacarb‐rich agricultural soils samples used to screen
bacteria with hydrolytic activity were collected from var-
ious places of Zhejiang, Anhui, and Henan Provinces,
China. (R,S)‐5‐chloro‐1‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐2‐hydroxy‐1H‐
indene‐2‐carboxylic acid methyl ester (98%) was prepared
from 5‐chloro‐1‐indanone in our laboratory, according to
reported procedures.29-31 All chemicals used were analyt-
ical reagents.
Nowadays, the biocatalytic approach using microor-
ganisms or isolated enzymes, from the perspective of
environmental and industrial application, has increas-
ingly to be a recent focus on chemical, agricultural, and
pharmaceutical industries. Because of the potential for
the preparation of chiral compounds with high optical
purity, the biocatalytic approach has gradually become a
research hotspot for the synthesis of chiral compounds.
In comparison with chemical synthesis, the biocatalytic
approach has many superiorities because of high selectiv-
ity, broad substrate range, environment‐friendly process,
and mild reaction conditions. In particular, dynamic
kinetic resolution (DKR) that couples a racemization
reaction with a conversion of the unwanted enantiomer
into the product, can increase the yield up to 100%.16-19
Also, whole‐cell biocatalysts compared with isolated
enzyme shows the advantages of cheap, stable, less labo-
rious, and accessible. The whole microbial cells as excel-
lent catalysts,20 avoiding cofactor addition and enzyme
purification, have the advantages of high substrate speci-
ficity, good stereoselectivity, mild reaction conditions,
and low pollution. The whole cell biocatalytic synthesis
has continually emerged as an outstanding method to
replace traditional chemical methods in some fields.21-25
Few bacterial strains like, Lactobacillus paracasei BD101
were used as whole cell biocatalyst for pure (S)‐
cyclohexyl (phenyl)methanol.26 Also, Vitale et al27 used
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 whole cells for the pro-
duction of (S)‐rivastigmine. Samuel et al28 used Bacillus
2.2 | Analytical methods
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was recorded on
Bruker Ultrashield spectrometer (Bruker Ltd.,Swissland)
operating at 500 MHz (1H NMR) and 125 MHz (13C
NMR) in CDCl3. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry
(GC‐MS) analysis was performed on an Agilent 7980A
GC system equipped with an HP‐5MS Agilent 19091S‐
433 column.
The progress of the hydrolysis reaction was monitored
by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC,
Waters, 1525), and the biotransformation yield and
enantioselectivity were quantitatively determined. The
determination was carried out by using an HPLC method
on an Ultimate Cellud‐Y (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, Yuexu,
China) column with a mobile phase of chromatographic
grade n‐hexane and isopropanol (80:20, v/v) at 0.5
mL/min flow rate, UV detection wavelength was set to
254 nm, column temperature was 25°C and injection vol-
ume was 10 μL. The retention time of 5‐chloro‐1‐
indanone, (S)‐5‐chloro‐1‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐2‐hydroxy‐1H‐
indene‐2‐carboxylic acid methyl ester, and (R)‐5‐chloro‐
1‐oxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐2‐hydroxy‐1H‐indene‐2‐carboxylic acid
methyl ester was 17.49, 18.86, and 23.50 minutes, respec-
tively (Figure 2).
One unit of esterase activity was defined as the
amount of enzyme required to catalyze the hydrolysis of
1 μmol of substrate per minute at 30°C, pH 7.0. The peak