Organic Process Research & Development 2002, 6, 463−470
Rapid Determination of Enantiomeric Excess Using Infrared Thermography
Nicolas Millot, Phil Borman, Mike S. Anson, Ian B. Campbell, Simon J. F. Macdonald, and Mahmoud Mahmoudian*
GlaxoSmithKline Research and DeVelopment, Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road,
SteVenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, England
Abstract:
detected by IRT as small temperature changes can be
measured in cellular metabolism, growth, and toxic re-
Infrared thermography (IRT) is presented as a novel technique
to screen a potentially large number of asymmetric catalysts
or substrates in a high-throughput fashion. IRT was used as a
simple, rapid, and practical approach for initial screening of
the substrate specificity of Candida antarctica lipase. This was
carried out using a 96-well microtitre plate format. Potential
advantages and limitations of IRT for the enzymatic stereose-
lective acylation of primary and secondary alcohols of interest
are discussed.
1
1
sponse. Acceleration of drug screening is one of the
potential applications of IRT in the pharmaceutical industry.
Given the recent reports from Reetz et al. on the use of
1
2
IRT for the selection of chiral catalysts, we decided to
extend these studies and to investigate its potential application
for the rapid quantification of ee in enzyme-catalysed
1
3,14
reactions.
Results and Discussion
We at GlaxoSmithKline frequently screen biocatalysts
isolated enzymes, recombinant microorganisms) and chiral
Introduction
(
Enzymes have been used extensively in chemical syn-
thesis to generate chiral synthons.1,2 Enzymatic kinetic
resolution is one of the most widely used approaches for
the preparation of chiral pharmaceutical intermediates as
enantiomers of racemic mixtures can often be efficiently
ligands for enantioselective transformations. For high-
throughput screening (HTS), the bottleneck is usually in the
speed of chiral analyses involving laborious development of
chiral HPLC and GC assays. Consequently, we are particu-
larly interested in developing new approaches for rapid
determination of ee. Recently Reetz et al. highlighted the
use of thermal imaging for the screening of enantioselective
3
resolved in this manner. Rapid determination of enantio-
meric excess (ee) is frequently hampered by the availability
of a suitable chiral assay. Chiral HPLC, GC, and chiral shift
NMR are the most preferred techniques, but these methods
can suffer from being too time-consuming to develop. Other
12
biocatalysts. Interestingly, they observed a differential heat
output during the thermal imaging of lipase-catalysed acy-
4,5
6
approaches used by several groups include fluorescence,
(7) Reetz, M. T.; Becker, M. H.; Klein, H.-W.; St o¨ ckigt, D. A Method for High-
Throughput Screening of Enantioselective Catalysts. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1999, 38, 1758.
8) Reetz, M. T.; K u¨ hling, K. M.; Deege, A.; Hinrichs, H.; Belder, D. Super-
High-Throughput Screening of Enantioselective Catalysts by Using Capillary
Array Electrophoresis Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3891.
9) Ding, K.; Ishii, A.; Mikami, K. Super High-Throughput Screening (SHTS)
of Chiral Ligands and Activators: Asymmetric Activation of Chiral Diol-
Zinc Catalysts by Chiral Nitrogen Activators for the Enantioselective
Addition of Diethylzinc to Aldehydes Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
7
8
mass spectroscopy, capillary electrophoresis, and circular
9
dichroism techniques.
(
Among these methods, infrared thermography (IRT) has
attracted considerable interest in recent years because non-
invasive thermal imaging of chemical reactions can be
performed through detection of emitted infrared radiations.
In Vitro and in ViVo biological processes have also been
(
10
497.
(
10) Taylor, S. J.; Morken, J. P. Thermographic Selection of Effective Catalysts
*
Author for correspondence. E-mail: mm6382@yahoo.co.uk.
1) Koeller, K. M.; Wong, C.-H. Enzymes for Chemical Synthesis. Nature 2001,
09, 232.
from an Encoded Polymer-Bound Library Science 1998, 280, 267.
(
(
(
(
(11) (a) Paulik M. A.,; Buckholz, R. G.; Lancaster, M.; E. Dallas, W. S.; Hull-
Ryde, E. A.; Weiel, J. E.; Lenhard, J. M. Development of Infrared Imaging
to Measure Thermogenesis in Cell Culture: Thermogenic Effects of
Uncoupling Protein-2, Troglitazone, and Adrenoceptor Agonists. Pharm.
Res. 1998, 15, 944. (b) Lenhard, J. M.; Paulik, M. A. Infrared Thermography
for Measuring Real-Time Thermogenesis in Organisms and Cells. PCT Int.
Appl. WO 9960630 A1 19991125, 1999.
(12) (a) Reetz, M. T.; Becker, M. H.; K u¨ hling, K. M.; Holzwarth, A. Time-
resolved IR-Thermographic Detection and Screening of Enantioselectivity
in Catalytic Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2647. (b) Reetz,
M. T.; Becker, M. H.; Liebl, M.; F u¨ rstner, A. IR-Thermographic Screening
of Thermoneutral or Endothermic Transformations: The Ring-Closing Olefin
Metathesis Reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1236.
(13) High-throughput enzyme-inhibitor screening has been reported by an array
of thermistors: Connolly, R.; Sutherland, J. D. Catalyst Screening Using
an Array of Thermistors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4268.
(14) Low-throughput calorimetric methods have been reported for monitoring
enzymes reactions: (a) Ramsden, D. K.; Webster, N. A.; Peron, Y.; Hughes,
J. Calorimetric Method for the Monitoring and Control of Bioreactions.
Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22, 1259. (b) Stefuca, V.; Gemeiner, P. Investigation
of Catalytic Properties of Immobilized Enzymes and Cells by Flow
Microcalorimetry. AdV. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 1999, 64, 69 and
references therein.
4
2) Schmid, A.; Dordick, J. S.; Hauer, B.; Kiener, A.; Wubbolts, M.; Witholt,
B. Industrial Biocatalysis Today and Tomorrow. Nature 2001, 409, 258.
3) Keith, J. M.; Larrow, J. F.; Jacobsen, E. N. Practical Considerations in
Kinetic Resolution Reactions. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 5.
4) For excellent reviews see: (a) Reetz, M. T. Combinatorial and Evolution-
Based Methods in the Creation of Enantioselective Catalysts. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 284. (b) Wahler, D.; Reymond, J.-L. Novel Methods for
Biocatalyst Screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 152.
5) (a) Le Bars, J.; H a¨ ussner, T.; Lang, J.; Pfaltz, A.; Blackmond, D. G. A
Scale-Transparent Reaction Calorimetric Assay for Rapid Catalyst Screening.
AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 207; (b) Jandeleit, B.; Schaefer, D. J.; Powers,
T. S.; Turner, H. W.; Weinberg, W. H. Combinatorial Material Science
and Catalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2494.
6) (a) Korbel, G. A..; Lalic G.; Shair, M. D. Reaction Microarrays: A Method
for Rapidly Determining the Enantiomeric Excess of Thousands of Samples
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 361. (b) Badalassi, F.; Wahler, D.; Klein, G.;
Crotti, P.; Reymond, J.-L. A Versatile Periodate-Coupled Fluorogenic Assay
for Hydrolytic Enzymes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4067. (c) Reetz,
M. T.; Sostmann, S. 2,15-Dihydroxyhexahelicene (HELIXOL): Synthesis
and Use as an Enantioselective Fluorescent Sensor Tetrahedron 2001, 57,
(
(
2
515.
1
0.1021/op010093k CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Vol. 6, No. 4, 2002 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
463
Published on Web 03/05/2002