A. Naka et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 825-826 (2016) 63e68
67
Table 2
hydrolyzed with dilute hydrochloric acid. The organic layer was
separated, washed with water, and dried over anhydrous magne-
sium sulfate. After the solvent was evaporated, compound 5
(0.1157 g, 47% yield) was isolated by a silica gel column eluting with
hexane-chloroform (2:1) as a red solid: M.p. 92e93 ꢁC. HRMS (ESI)
exact mass calcd for C99H103N9S9I3 (Mþ þ H): 2086.29514, found
DSSC performance for compound 7.
Compound
VOC/mV
JSC/mAcmꢀ2
FF
PCE (h)%
7-P
7-T
315
363
0.70
1.21
0.63
0.61
0.14
0.27
2086.29744. MS m/z 2085 (Mþ); 1H NMR (
d CDCl3) 0.83 (t, 9H, CH3,
J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 0.84 (t, 9H, CH3, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 1.16e1.34 (m, 36H, CH2), 1.62
(quint, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 1.71 (quint, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 2.65 (t,
6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 2.72 (t, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 7.26 (s 3H, thie-
nylene protons), 7.50 (s, 3H, thienylene protons), 7.63 (d, 3H, phe-
nylene protons, J ¼ 7.0 Hz), 7.70 (d, 3H, phenylene protons,
J ¼ 7.0 Hz), 7.87 (d, 6H, phenylene protons, J ¼ 8.6 Hz), 8.80 (d, 6H,
condition and the resulting TiO2 electrodes were applied to DSSCs.
Studies to explore starlike molecules other than DSSC applications
are in progress.
3. Experimental
phenylene protons, J ¼ 8.6 Hz); 13C NMR (
d CDCl3) 14.02, 14.04
3.1. General procedures
(CH3), 22.47, 22.53, 29.0, 29.1, 29.2, 29.7, 30.5, 30.6, 31.47, 31.54
(CH2), 125.4, 126.1, 126.4, 127.3, 129.5 (3C), 129.6, 132.8, 135.1, 137.8,
138.2, 139.0, 143.1, 143.5, 143.7, 153.8, 153.9, 170.7 (thienylene and
phenylene carbons).
All reactions were performed under an atmosphere of dry ni-
trogen. NMR spectra were recorded on JNMeECS400 spectrometer
and JNMeLA500 spectrometer. Loweresolution mass spectra were
measured on a JEOL Model JMSe700 instrument. High-resolution
mass spectra were measured using LTQ Orbitrap XL at the Natural
Science Center for Basic Research and Development (N-BARD),
Hiroshima University. UVevisible absorption spectra were
measured with a JASCO Ve560 spectrometer in dioxane. Fluores-
cence spectra were measured with a JASCO FPe8200 spectrometer
and JASCO FPe8300 spectrometer. Melting point was measured
with a YanacoeMPeS3 apparatus. Column chromatography was
performed by using Wakogel Ce300 (WAKO). THF used as a solvent
was distilled from sodium/benzophenone ketyl, just before use.
Compounds 2 and 3 were synthesized following a procedure
described in literature [25,32]. Fabrication and evaluation of DSSCs
were performed as reported in the literature [22,23].
3.1.3. Synthesis of compound 6
In a 50 mL threeenecked flask was placed 9.2435 g (31.5 mmol)
of 2-bromo-5-pentamethyldisilanylthiophene in 150 mL of THF. To
this was added 20.0 mL (32.0 mmol) of a 1.6 M n-butylli-
thiumehexane solution at e80ꢁC. After the mixture was stirred for
2 h at e80ꢁC, the resulting mixture was slowly added to 10.8589 g
(33.4 mmol) of tributyltin chloride at e80ꢁC. After the mixture was
stirred for 1 h at e80ꢁC, it was warmed to room temperature and
stirred over night. After the mixture was hydrolyzed with dilute
hydrochloric acid. The organic layer was separated, washed with
water, and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After the
solvent was evaporated, compound 6 (10.4707 g, 66% yield) was
isolated by a silica gel column eluting with hexane: MS m/z 504
(Mþ) 1H NMR (
d CDCl3) 0.09 (s, 9H, SiMe3), 0.37 (s, 6H, SiMe2), 0.89
3.1.1. Synthesis of compound 4
(t, 9H, CH3, J ¼ 7.2 Hz), 1.08e1.12 (m, 6H, CH2), 1.34 (sext, 6H, CH2,
In
a 200 mL twoenecked flask was placed 0.6270 g
J ¼ 7.2 Hz), 1.53e1.64 (m, 6H, CH2), 7.25 (d 1H, thienylene proton,
J ¼ 3.6 Hz), 7.33 (d, 1H, thienylene proton, J ¼ 3.6 Hz); 13C NMR (
d
(0.912 mmol) of 2 and 2.4078 g (4.40 mmol) of 4-(5-bromo-3-
hexylthiophen-2-yl)-7-(3-hexylthiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thia-
diazol (3) and 0.8927 g (2.74 mmol) of cesium carbonate and
0.0676 g (0.0963 mmol) of bis(triphenylphosphine)dichloropalla-
dium in 75 mL of THF and 15 mL of H2O. After the mixture was
heated to reflux for 3 days, it was hydrolyzed with dilute hydro-
chloric acid. The organic layer was separated, washed with water,
and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. After the solvent was
evaporated, compound 4 (0.3743 g, 24% yield) was isolated by a
silica gel column eluting with hexane-ethyl acetate (50:1) as a red
solid: M.p. 75e76 ꢁC. HRMS (ESI) exact mass calcd for C99H106N9S9
(Mþ þ H): 1708.60521, found 1708.60650. MS m/z 1707 (Mþ); 1H
CDCl3) ꢀ2.5 (Me2Si), ꢀ2.4 (Me3Si), 10.9, 13.7, 27.2, 29.0 (Bu), 134.7,
136.2, 142.1, 144.5 (thienyl ring carbons).
3.1.4. Synthesis of compound 7
In
a 100 mL twoenecked flask was placed 0.1031 g
(0.0493 mmol) of 5 and 0.1668 g (0.331 mmol) of 6 and 0.0041 g
(0.0058 mmol) of bis(triphenylphosphine)dichloropalladium in
23 mL of THF. After the mixture was heated to reflux for 4 days, it
was hydrolyzed with dilute hydrochloric acid. The organic layer
was separated, washed with water, and dried over anhydrous
magnesium sulfate. After the solvent was evaporated, compound 7
(0.0274 g, 24% yield) was isolated by a silica gel column eluting with
hexane-chloroform (2:1) as a dark red solid: M.p. 86e87 ꢁC. HRMS
(ESI) exact mass calcd for C126H154N9Si6S12 (Mþ þ H): 2344.75858,
NMR (
d
CDCl3) 0.83 (t, 9H, CH3, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 0.85 (t, 9H, CH3,
J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 1.21e1.32 (m, 36H, CH2), 1.65 (quint, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz),
1.72 (quint, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 2.69 (t, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 2.74 (t,
6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.4 Hz), 7.12 (d 3H, thienylene protons, J ¼ 5.2 Hz), 7.46
(d, 3H, thienylene protons, J ¼ 5.2 Hz), 7.52 (s, 3H, thienylene
protons), 7.69 (d, 3H, phenylene protons, J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 7.73 (d, 3H,
phenylene protons, J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 7.90 (d, 6H, phenylene protons,
found 2344.75747. MS m/z 2343 (Mþ); 1H NMR (
d CDCl3) 0.13 (s,
27H, SiMe3), 0.40 (s, 18H, SiMe2), 0.84 (t, 9H, CH3, J ¼ 7.0 Hz), 0.85 (t,
9H, CH3, J ¼ 7.0 Hz), 1.20e1.34 (m, 36H, CH2), 1.69 (quint, 6H, CH2,
J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 1.73 (quint, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 2.69 (t, 6H, CH2,
J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 2.74 (t, 6H, CH2, J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 7.10 (d, 3H, thienylene
protons, J ¼ 3.2 Hz), 7.21 (s 3H, thienylene protons), 7.31 (d, 3H,
thienylene protons, J ¼ 3.2 Hz), 7.52 (s, 3H, thienylene protons), 7.70
(d, 3H, phenylene protons, J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 7.74 (d, 3H, phenylene pro-
tons, J ¼ 7.6 Hz), 7.90 (d, 6H, phenylene protons, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 8.83 (d,
J ¼ 8.8 Hz), 8.83 (d, 6H, phenylene protons, J ¼ 8.8 Hz); 13C NMR (
d
CDCl3) 13.9 (2C) (CH3), 22.4, 22.5, 29.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.6, 30.5 (2C),
31.4 (2C) (CH2), 125.2, 125.8, 126.3, 126.9, 127.4, 129.1, 129.3, 129.5,
129.7, 132.1, 132.9, 135.0, 137.6, 141.5, 142.9, 143.5, 153.8, 154.1, 170.4
(thienylene and phenylene carbons).
6H, phenylene protons, J ¼ 8.4 Hz); 13C NMR (
d CDCl3) e2.9 (Me2Si),
3.1.2. Synthesis of compound 5
e2.4 (Me3Si), 14.1 (2C) (CH3), 22.5 (2C), 29.2 (2C), 29.7 (2C), 30.6,
30.7, 31.64 (2C) (CH2), 125.2, 125.6, 126.0, 126.6, 126.9, 127.2, 129.5,
129.6, 129.8, 131.0, 133.1, 134.8, 135.2, 137.9, 138.1, 139.1, 142.2, 142.7,
143.1, 143.6, 154.0 (2C), 171.0 (thienylene and phenylene carbons);
In a 100 mL twoenecked flask was placed 0.2020 g (0.118 mmol)
of 4 in 18 mL of chloroform and 3 mL of acetic acid. To this was
added 0.0997 g (0.443 mmol) of N-iodosuccinimide with ice cool-
ing and the mixture was stirred over night. The mixture was
29Si NMR (
d
CDCl3) e23.5, ꢀ18.8.