Organic Letters
Letter
the literature, but some challenges still require additional efforts
to extend this reaction in synthetically interesting new
directions.14 In particular, the use of hindered amines in
intermolecular aza-Michael reactions remains scarce in the
literature thus limiting the substrate scope to more reactive
amines such as hydroxylamine derivatives or nitrogen-containing
heterocycles. In addition, the reversibility inherent to the
addition of an amine onto iminium species, the amine
nucleophile/aminocatalyst competition toward addition and
the intermolecular nature of the strategy are potential difficulties
to embark on the reaction of para-quinamines 1 with α,β-
unsaturated aldehydes 2. Nevertheless, recent breakthroughs in
aza-Michael reactions with amines catalyzed by diarylprolinol
silyl ethers 3 and AcONa were a driving force to investigate the
desymmetrization depicted in Scheme 1.15
gave rise to 4aa in 80% yield and 96% ee (entry 3). Experiments
carried out under acidic conditions (entry 4) or neutral
conditions (entry 5) gave lower yields of 4aa. The influence of
the reaction medium was then investigated by screening various
solvents (entries 6−8). While toluene turned out to be a suitable
solvent for the desymmetrization process (4aa, 50% yield),
switching to DMF or MeCN was detrimental to the formation of
4aa. With the optimized conditions in hand (Table 1, entry 3),
the scope and limitations with respect to the nature of R1 and R2
were assessed (Table 2). A reaction time of 7 days was required
to ensure maximum conversion rates and optimal yields. Initially,
changes to the R2 group on the α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 2 were
investigated (2a−m). We first focused our attention on the
influence of the position of the aromatic substituent on the
efficiency and stereoselectivities of the reaction. Starting from
aldehydes 2b and 2e bearing a methyl or a methoxy group in
para-position, similar results as for 4aa were obtained even if a
slight decrease of ee was observed for 4ae (entries 1, 2, and 5).
For the methyl and methoxy series, the reaction rate starting
from 1a is in the order para > meta > ortho with similar levels of
stereoselectivities within each series (entries 2−7). This
reactivity order could be explained by an increased steric
hindrance at the β position of the enal thus hampering the
nucleophilic addition of the para-quinamine 1a. Substrates 2h
and 2i possessing a halogen group also reacted to afford the
desired hydroindoles 4ah and 4ai in 61% and 51% yield,
respectively, with good diastereoselectivities and high enantio-
selectivities (entries 8 and 9). Surprisingly, a slight decrease of
reactivity (27−30% yield) was observed starting from α,β-
a
Table 1. Reaction Optimization
b
c
d
entry
3
solvent
% yield
dr
% ee
1
2
3
3a
3b
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
3c
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
toluene
DMF
60
4:1
n.d.
3:1
4:1
2:1
2:1
n.d.
3:1
92
n.r.
80
n.d.
96
e
a
4
57
95
Table 2. Substrate Scope
f
5
65
95
6
7
8
50
92
<10
20
n.d.
97
MeCN
a
Reactions were performed on 0.15 mmol scale using 1 equiv of 1a,
1.5 equiv of 2a, 20 mol % of 3, and 1 equiv of AcONa at 55 °C for 3
days unless otherwise noted. n.r. = no reaction. n.d. = not determined.
b
c
d
b
c
entry
R1
R2
Ph (2a)
4
% yield
dr
% ee
Isolated yield for the major diastereomer. Diastereomeric ratios were
1
e
determined by H NMR analysis of the crude. The structure of each
diastereomer has been determined by full analyses; see Supporting
1
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Me (1a)
Et (1b)
4aa
4ab
4ac
4ad
4ae
4af
80
76
65
50
71
61
43
61
51
30
27
63
42
24
13
61
3:1
5:1
5:1
4:1
5:1
5:1
5:1
4:1
5:1
2:1
4:1
5:1
4:1
2.5:1
2:1
5:1
96
93
93
92
81
n.d.
88
92
93
97
90
86
69
88
90
93
2
4-MeC6H4 (2b)
3-MeC6H4 (2c)
2-MeC6H4 (2d)
4-MeOC6H4 (2e)
3-MeOC6H4 (2f)
2-MeOC6H4 (2g)
4-ClC6H4 (2h)
4-FC6H4 (2i)
4-NO2C6H4 (2j)
2-NO2C6H4 (2k)
2-thienyl (2l)
Me (2m)
d
Information for further studies. Enantiomeric excesses were
3
determined by chiral HPLC on the Wittig products prepared from
4
e
major diastereomers. See Supporting Information. One equivalent of
5
f
AcOH was used instead of AcONa. No AcONa was added to the
6
reaction mixture.
7
4ag
4ah
4ai
8
9
We began our investigation by studying the reaction of the
readily available para-quinamine 1a with trans-cinnamaldehyde
2a in the presence of diarylprolinol silyl ether catalysts 3 and
AcONa (Table 1).16 The tosyl nitrogen protecting group of 1a is
essential to the success of the reaction.17 For instance, acetyl or
tert-butoxycarbonyl groups shut down the reactivity of the para-
quinamines because these groups rendered the NH less acidic for
a subsequent deprotonation under basic conditions.15b Starting
from 1a, various diarylprolinol silyl ether catalysts 3 were
investigated (entries 1−3).18 The catalyst 3a provided the
desired product 4aa in 60% isolated yield and 92% ee for the
major diastereomer, while no reaction occurred by using the 3,5-
(CF3)2C6H3-derived catalyst 3b (entries 1 and 2). In order to
improve the yield, we surmised that the presence of a bulkier silyl
group (e.g., TBS) could improve the stability and lifetime of the
catalyst.10b Therefore, the best result was obtained with 3c, which
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4aj
4ak
4al
4am
4ba
4ca
4da
Ph (2a)
Bu (1c)
Ph (1d)
Ph (2a)
Ph (2a)
a
Reactions were performed on 0.15 mmol scale using 1 equiv of 1, 1.5
equiv of 2, 20 mol % of 3c, and 1 equiv of AcONa at 55 °C for 7 days
unless otherwise noted. n.d. = not determined. Isolated yield for the
major diastereomer. Diastereomeric ratios were determined by H
NMR analysis of the crude. Enantiomeric excesses were determined
by chiral HPLC on the Wittig products prepared from major
diastereomers 4. See Supporting Information for details. In this
b
c
1
d
e
case, the reaction mixture was stirred for 3 days.
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX