9368
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 115, No. 20, 22 November 2001
Thomsen et al.
and 0.5 nm indicating that the fully thermalized fragments
are only separated by two or three water molecules. This
clearly demonstrates the efficiency by which the liquid sol-
vent, in the present case water, is able to act as a sink of the
excess energy released after the photodissociation. The short
thermalization distances observed also suggests that a con-
tinuum description of the dissociation and recombination dy-
namics is likely to be an over simplification. A more correct,
and unified treatment of dissociation, caging and recombina-
tion would be based on the nonadiabatic molecular dynamics
surface-hopping techniques36,38 previously used to study
halogens in noble-gas matrices. In the following, we will
briefly discuss a simple model that describes the efficient
solvent-solute interaction observed.
libration component to solvation,55 an intermediate time
scale
(Ϸ0.2–1 ps)
and
a
slow
time
scale
(Ϸ1–10 ps).56–58 For the slower time scale, a range of
times is given to represent the observation of the relaxation
of different tensorial components ͑dipole, polarizability͒. The
slow and intermediate time scale are, at least by some au-
thors, considered to be a slow structural relaxation time, cor-
responding to the relaxation of a low density icelike struc-
ture, followed by an intermediate time scale relaxation of a
single water molecule. As indicated this is a very active area
of research with many differing views of the water reorien-
tation. Librational/inertial motion is characterized by small
and fast angular displacements, whereas the reorientation
processes are characterized by large and slower angular dis-
placements where the hydrogen bonds are broken. The relax-
ation time used to fit the data, FϷ1 ps, thus indicates that
the solvent motion responsible for stopping the recoiling
fragments is related to the large displacements of the water
molecules. Since the solvated HOCl molecule will perturb
the local water structure, we expect a faster dynamics than
for pure water. As the solute HOCl is likely to lower the
hydrogen bond coordination of the water molecules, equiva-
lent to raising the temperature,59 the relaxation time obtained
is most likely to be related to the slow relaxation time, de-
scribing the structural relaxation of the hydrogen bond net-
work.
As mentioned in the beginning of this paper, we take the
value of
r
as a direct consequence of the ‘‘stopping
͘
͗
0
power’’ of the solvent, i.e., the distance the fragments travel
in the liquid before their kinetic energies are reduced to
ϳkT. In order to investigate the energy dissipation during
the recoil of the fragments in solution, information about the
potential-energy surface along the reaction path is needed.
The gas-phase value of the dissociation energy along the
asymmetric stretch is measured to D0ϭ2.39 eV.48,49 We take
into account the solvent from the estimated solvation ener-
51
52
gies for HOCl ͑0.3 eV͒,50 OH ͑0.44 eV͒ and Cl ͑0.1 eV͒
and obtain a dissociation energy of 2.15 eV along the asym-
metric stretch of HOCl in aqueous solution. This leaves 2.5
eV to be distributed among the intra and intermolecular de-
grees of freedom of the fragments, and, as discussed above,
this energy solely goes into the kinetic energy of the recoil-
In conclusion we have used femtosecond transient ab-
sorption spectroscopy to study the photolysis of HOCl.
Pumping HOCl at 266 nm, we observed unity quantum yield
for direct photodissociation into OH and Cl atoms. 45% of
the fragments recombine geminately after diffusion. 55% of
the fragment escapes recombination and we see indications
of a secondary reaction between escaped Cl and unexcited
HOCl molecules, causing a small excess of OH radicals. Ini-
tially the photofragments have a substantial amount of ki-
netic energy ͑ϳ2.5 eV͒, but they are quickly thermalized in
the aqueous solvent. A preliminary molecular dynamics
simulation indicates a thermalization distance of ͑ϳ0.6 nm͒,
corresponding to a complete thermalization of the hot frag-
ments within the first two solvation shells. Consequently, we
do not expect continuum models, based on bulk water prop-
erties to give a precise representation of the recombination
dynamics. Nevertheless, estimates of the thermalization dis-
tance, based on the generalized Langevin equation, and the
recombination dynamics, based on the Smoluchowski diffu-
sion equation, give result that are qualitatively in agreement
with the experimental observation.
ing Cl and OH fragments. The distance r is thus a mea-
͗
͘
0
sure of how far the two fragments travel in the solution be-
fore the 2.5 eV are dissipated into the solvent. In the simplest
description of the thermalization process, one can apply the
Langevin equation, using a frequency independent friction of
the solvent, to calculate the thermalization distances.53 This
approach results in a thermalization distance much shorter
than the contact radius, R and is consequently not in agree-
ment with the observation of complete dissociation. Extend-
ing the description to the GLE, by assuming a frequency-
dependent solvent friction,54 gives a better description of the
thermalization process. Assuming a time-dependent friction
of the form,
t͒ϭ exp Ϫt/͒,
͑12͒
͑
͑
0
where is the static friction of liquid water and as re-
0
sponse time of the order of 1 ps, we obtain thermalization
distances in qualitative agreement with both the experimental
data and the MD-simulation.
1 K. A. Peterson, S. Skokov, and J. M. Bowman, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7446
͑1999͒.
When the recoiling fragments separate, they have to dis-
place the surrounding water molecules in order to escape the
solvent cage. In doing so, the fragments will rupture the
hydrogen bonds in water and angularly displace the water
molecules, and we thus expect to find, that is of the same
order as the reorientation time constant determined for single
water molecules. The relaxation time needed to model the
experimental data is of the order of 1 ps. Fast relaxation
processes in water occurs generally on three time scales. A
very fast time scale (Ͻ50 fs) representing the inertial/
2 M. Ortiz-Repiso, R. Escribano, and P. C. Gomez, J. Phys. Chem. A 104,
600 ͑2000͒.
3 J. Thøgersen, C. L. Thomsen, J.-Aa. Poulsen, and S. R. Keiding, J. Phys.
Chem. A 102, 4186 ͑1998͒.
4 T. Kuhne and P. Vohringer, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10788 ͑1996͒.
5 E. Gershgoren, U. Banin, and S. Ruhman, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 9 ͑1998͒.
6 C. L. Thomsen, D. Madsen, J. Thøgersen, and S. R. Keiding, J. Chem.
Phys. 111, 703 ͑1999͒.
7 D. W. Oxtoby, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 2605 ͑1979͒.
8 R. F. Grote and J. T. Hynes, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 2715 ͑1980͒.
9 B. M. Ladanyi and R. M. Stratt, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2008 ͑1999͒.
10 G. Goodyear and R. M. Stratt, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10050 ͑1996͒.
158.42.28.33 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:50:48