J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 117, No. 9, 1 September 2002
The photolysis of S2Cl2
4219
IV. CONCLUSION
ported by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie, the Alexander
von Humboldt Stiftung, and the German–Israeli Foundation
͑GIF͒. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft is gratefully acknowledged.
Using 3D imaging spectroscopy, we have measured the
competing dissociation channels to release S2ClϩCl or
S2ϩ2Cl in the photolysis of S2Cl2 at 235 nm. The main
experimental findings are summarized as follows.
͑1͒ Overall the branching ratio of reaction ͑2͒ releasing
S2ClϩCl and reaction ͑1͒ releasing S2ϩ2Cl was determined
to be 1.0:1.2. If the two spin–orbit states are viewed sepa-
rately, the branching ratio decreases for ground state Cl to
1 R. S. Speth, R. Niemann, and E. Tiemann, Chem. Phys. 229, 309 ͑1998͒.
2
¨
F. Feher and H. Munzer, Chem. Ber. 96, 1131 ͑1963͒.
3 H. P. Koch, J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 394.
4 B. Beagley, G. H. Eckersley, D. P. Brown, and D. Tomlinson, Trans.
Faraday Soc. 65, 2300 ͑1969͒.
*
ϳ1.0:2.45 and increases for excited Cl to ϳ1.0:0.4.
2
*
͑2͒ The yield of Cl in the excited spin–orbit state P1/2
5 I. Tokue, A. Hiraya, and K. Shobatake, Chem. Phys. Lett. 153, 346 ͑1988͒.
6 S. A. Chasovnikov, A. I. Chichinin, and L. N. Krasnoperov, Chem. Phys.
116, 91 ͑1987͒.
*
was found to be (Cl )ϭ0.35Ϯ0.03.
͑3͒ The translational energy disposal for reaction ͑1͒ was
determined to be 0.53Ϯ0.03 and 0.54Ϯ0.03 and for reaction
7 E. Tiemann, H. Kanamori, and E. Hirota, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 137, 278
͑1989͒.
*
͑2͒ 0.55Ϯ0.03 and 0.58Ϯ0.03 for Cl and Cl , respectively.
8 J. Park, Y. Lee, and G. W. Flynn, Chem. Phys. Lett. 186, 441 ͑1991͒.
9 Y. R. Lee, C. L. Chiu, and S. M. Lin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 216, 209 ͑1994͒.
10 C. Chiu and H. Chang, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 50, 2239 ͑1993͒.
11 J. Lindner, R. Niemann, and E. Tiemann, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 165, 358
͑1994͒.
*
͑4͒ The two-body decay, releasing fast Cl ͑11%͒ and Cl
͑19%͒, occurs mainly on a repulsive 1A state through an
electronic transition with a  parameter of 0.45 and 0.24 for
*
12 Y. R. Lee, C. L. Chiu, E. Tiemann, and S. M. Lin, J. Chem. Phys. 110,
6812 ͑1999͒.
Cl and Cl , respectively. The reduced  value in the case of
1
1
*
Cl is probably due to mixed excitation of A and B, where
6% of the observed Cl are released via the excited B state.
13 C. Maul and K.-H. Gericke, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 16, 1 ͑1997͒.
14 J. Park, Y. Lee, J. F. Hershberger, J. M. Hossenlopp, and G. W. Flynn, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 58 ͑1992͒.
1
*
͑5͒ The three-body decay, releasing relatively slow Cl
1
15 A. Chichinin, T. Einfeld, C. Maul, and K.-H. Gericke, Rev. Sci. Instrum.
73, 1856 ͑2002͒.
*
͑54%͒ and Cl ͑16%͒ atoms, occurs on a repulsive B state
through an electronic transition with a  parameter of Ϫ0.25
in the first step. The decay has a sequential character and the
16 T. Einfeld, A. Chichinin, C. Maul, and K.-H. Gericke, J. Chem. Phys. 116,
2803 ͑2002͒.
*
second step Cl or Cl atoms are released isotropically ͑
17 S. E. Sobottka and M. B. Williams, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 35, 348 ͑1988͒.
18 O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, K. Ullmann-Pfleger, L. Spielberger, U. Meyer, R.
ϭ0͒.
¨
¨
Dorner, and H. Schmidt-Bocking, Fast Position and Time-Resolved Read-
Out of Micro-Channelplates with the Delay-Line Technique for Single
Particle and Photon Detection, edited by M. R. Descours and S. S. Shen,
Imaging Spectroscopy Vol. IV ͑San Diego, CA, 1998͒, p. 322.
19 M. Lampton, O. Siegmund, and R. Raffanti, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 2298
͑1987͒.
All observations can be rationalized in terms of a simul-
1
1
taneous excitation on a B and A surface. Accordingly, the
1
main B state excitation would lead to three fragments, S2
and two ground-state chlorine atoms. Originally from the 1B
state, nonadiabatic coupling might be responsible for a small
production of excited spin–orbit Cl atoms via two- and
20 J. Danielak, U. Domin, R. Kepa, M. Rytel, and M. Zachwieja, J. Mol.
Spectrosc. 181, 394 ͑1997͒.
1
three-body decay. The main B state excitation could be ac-
21 S. Arepalli, N. Presser, R. Robie, and R. Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett. 108,
88 ͑1985͒.
1
companied by a minor excitation of a A state, quickly de-
22 P. M. Regan, S. R. Langfold, D. Ascenzi, P. A. Cook, A. J. Orr-Ewing, and
M. N. R. Ashfold, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 3247 ͑1999͒.
23 M. W. Chase, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data Monogr. 9, IϩII ͑1998͒.
24 E. Tiemann, H. Kanamori, and E. Hirota, Annual Review, Institute for
Molecular Science, Okazaki, Japan, 1988.
caying into S2ClϩCl, with Cl atoms generated in both spin–
orbit states in almost equal amounts.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
25 R. N. Zare, Mol. Photochem. 4, 1 ͑1972͒.
26 M. Mons and I. Dimicoli, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 4037 ͑1989͒.
27 G. E. Busch and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3638 ͑1972͒.
The authors are grateful to Dr. R. Aures for numerous
stimulating discussions. These studies were generously sup-
132.236.27.111 On: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:58:07