ChemComm
Communication
In the presented communication we show the application of
simple hybrid materials (based on the cyanocarbon-modified
titanium dioxide) in the construction of three-valued photo-
electrochemical logic devices, which realise the gullibility and
consensus operations. This is the unique case, where two dual
operators can be realised in the same chemical system just by a
simple change in the output threshold values. We also propose
the mechanism responsible for the properties of the investigated
system along with the interpretation of the recorded photo-
current action spectra in terms of ternary Boolean logic. Such
systems may become fundamental to multivalued optoelectronic
logic circuits based on the easily accessible hybrid materials and may
contribute to the development of this certainly underappreciated
field of information processing.
Fig. 3 A fragment of a photocurrent action map with the three-valued
truth table corresponding to the accept anything operation (a). The
consensus operation can be realized by neglecting the photocurrents
with lowest intensities (b).
Financial support from the National Science Centre (grant no.
UMO-2011/03/B/ST5/01495) and the Foundation for Polish Science
(grant no. 71/UD/SKILLS/2014) is gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne and C. P. McCoy, Nature, 1993,
364, 42–44.
2 U. Pischel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4026–4040.
Fig. 4 The truth tables and symbols for the ternary gullibility (a) and
consensus (b) operations.
´
3 J. Andreasson and U. Pischel, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 174–188.
4 U. Pischel, Aust. J. Chem., 2010, 63, 148–164.
5 K. Szaciłowski, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3481–3548.
6 K. Szaciłowski, Infochemistry. Information Processing at the Nanoscale,
John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2012.
A simple modification of the photocurrent threshold, which
neglects some isovalue lines adjoining the UNKNOWN area
leads to another ternary basic operator – consensus. The consensus
operation applied to two ternary variables returns FALSE if both
inputs are FALSE, TRUE if both are TRUE or UNKNOWN in all the
other cases. These two gates of a dual nature are natural extensions
of OR and AND gates in three-valued logic. At the same time, the
system is incapable of realising the negation operation (the ternary
analogue of NOT); hence a complete set of logic operators cannot
be achieved.
The consensus and gullibility operations are rarely used in the
design of ternary logic circuits but are extremely useful in the
construction of arithmetic devices based on the balanced ternary logic.
Moreover, contrary to the molecular logic gates operating in solution,
the presented system can be easily concatenated.25 The output
(current) is compatible with one of the inputs (voltage) and an external
resistor would be sufficient for the proper communication between
individual gates. Similar solution can be used to prevent bidirectional
information transfer which could lead to undesired feedback loop – a
simple addition of a Schottky diode (e.g. based on a thin CdS layer)25
would provide unidirectional information transfer. Since the system is
based on the interaction with light (from an external source), the signal
amplification is not required and the photocurrent amplitude may be
sustained at the constant level within a circuit.
7 A. P. De Silva, Molecular logic-based computation, Royal Chemical
Society, Cambridge, 2012.
´
´
8 P. Remon, R. Ferreira, J. M. Montenegro, R. Suau, E. Perez-Inestrosa
and U. Pischel, ChemPhysChem, 2009, 10, 2004–2007.
9 P. L. Gentili, Chem. Phys., 2007, 336, 64–73.
10 P. L. Gentili, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112, 11992–11997.
11 P. L. Gentili, ChemPhysChem, 2011, 12, 739–745.
12 P. L. Gentili, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 20335–20344.
13 P. L. Gentili, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 25523–25549.
14 P. L. Gentili, Dyes Pigm., 2014, 110, 235–248.
15 M. Oszajca, K. L. McCall, N. Robertson and K. Szaciłowski, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2011, 115, 12187–12195.
16 S. Gawe¸da, A. Podborska, W. Macyk and K. Szaciłowski, Nanoscale,
2009, 1, 299–316.
17 K. Szaciłowski and W. Macyk, Chimia, 2007, 61, 831–834.
18 A. Podborska, M. Oszajca, S. Gawda and K. Szaciłowski, IET Circ.
Dev. Syst., 2011, 5, 103–114.
19 W. Chen, D. Qi, X. Gao and A. Tye Shen Wee, Prog. Surf. Sci., 2009,
84, 279–321.
20 J. Kuncewicz, P. Za¸bek, K. Kruczała, K. Szaciłowski and W. Macyk,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 21762–21770.
21 R. S. Davidson and R. M. Slater, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1976,
76, 2416–2424.
22 R. Jono, J. Fujisawa, H. Segawa and K. Yamashita, J. Phys. Chem.
Lett., 2011, 2, 1167–1170.
23 S. Manzhos, R. Jono, K. Yamashita, J. Fujisawa, M. Nagata and
H. Segawa, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 21487–21493.
24 S.-C. Chen and M.-L. Shyu, Multimedia Data Engineering Applications
and Processing, IGI Global, 2013.
25 J. Mech, R. Kowalik, A. Podborska, P. Kwolek and K. Szaciłowski,
Aust. J. Chem., 2010, 63, 1330–1333.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Chem. Commun.