2
d = 4.3 ppm throughout the course of the reaction (Fig. S4,
ESI†). Based on these observations, we conclude that these
no residual solvent peaks are observed in the H spectra. It is
therefore possible to easily conduct NMR kinetic experiments
in a variety of easily prepared ionic liquids. Using this method
it is possible to detect reaction intermediates that are undetect-
able using other forms of spectroscopy or are not present in
reactions carried out in molecular solvents.
2
steady-state intermediates are the h -diolato complexes of the
predominant Re(VII) peroxo species in the reaction mixtures.
Since the major rhenium-containing species is dependent on the
concentration of H2O2,12 different intermediates are observed at
different concentrations of H2O2.
This technique allows a variety of chemical transformations
to be studied in ionic media, since many types of organic
molecules can be regioselectively deuteriated using conven-
tional, economical H/D exchange processes. Examples include
carbonyl compounds, alkenes,13,14 terminal alkynes,15 and
cyclopentadiene.16 Only one reactant need be deuteriated, and
deuteriation is required only in positions that experience a
change during the course of a reaction. Given that certain
reactions exhibit significant kinetic (H/D) isotope effects,
caution must be employed in applying quantitative kinetic data
to reactions involving the analogous proteated substrates.
Nonetheless, by conducting reactions in structurally different
ionic liquids, the effects of solvent–solute interactions, such as
hydrogen bonding, Lewis acid–base, ionic, and ion–dipole, on
reaction rates, yields, and selectivities can be investigated.
These studies are currently in progress.
Using commercially available deuteriated substrates, we also
examined several other fundamental organic transformations in
ionic media (Table 1). These reactions are a testimony to the
various types of reactions and substrates that can be monitored
in ionic media using 2H NMR. Although each of these reactions
proceeds to completion using stoichiometric amounts of
reactants, we used a large excess of one reactant in order to
conduct these reactions under pseudo-first order conditions.
Two reactions were conducted in different ionic liquids to probe
the dependency of rate on the nature of the solvent (entries 3, 4
and 7, 8)—in these cases there is no appreciable difference in
rate when the reactions are conducted in two structurally
different ionic liquids. Here we also show how 2H NMR can be
used to easily monitor reactions in various ionic liquids.
There are many advantages to using this technique. This
method is highly cost efficient, since only a small amount of
deuteriated starting material is required for any given experi-
ment. There are many types of commercially available
perdeuteriated compounds that can be used as reactants (1H
NMR solvents are good examples). Most importantly, there is
no need to prepare relatively large amounts of various costly
perdeuteriated ionic liquids. Since the extent of protium
incorporation in proteated ionic liquids is naturally high (99%),
This contribution is dedicated to Professor Robert G.
Bergman. This material is based upon work supported by the
Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation (BYI award to M. M.
A.-O.) and by the National Science Foundation under grant
CHE-9874857-CAREER and equipment grant number CHE-
9974928.
Notes and references
Table 1 Reactions monitored via 2H NMR in ionic media
kobs/[Re]T/
‡ A typical experimental procedure: ([D8]Styrene epoxidation). An NMR
tube was charged with [Emim]BF4 (0.5 mL), UHP (47 mg), and 125 mL of
a 0.040 M MTO stock solution in CH3CN. After 10 min, an external
standard of CD3CN in C6H6 (30% v/v, d = 1.55 ppm) was added, along
with [D8]styrene (6 mL). The contents of the tube were mixed well, and 2H
NMR spectra were subsequently collected every 5 min on a Brüker Avance
500 MHz (1H) spectrometer.
Entry
Reactiona
Solventb
M21 s21
1
[EtPy]BF4
0.20 0.02
2
3
4
5
6
[EtPy]BF4
0.090 0.02
1 P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39,
3772–3789.
2 T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071–2084.
3 C. J. Anderson, G. R. Choppin, D. J. Pruett, D. Costa and W. Smith,
Radiochim. Acta, 1999, 84, 31–36.
4 G. S. Owens and M. M. Abu-Omar, Adv. Chem. Ser., in press.
5 T. A. Zawodzinski and R. A. Osteryoung, Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27,
4383–4384.
6 T. A. Zawodzinski and R. A. Osteryoung, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26,
2920–2922.
7 J. L. Gray and G. E. Maciel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103,
7147–7151.
8 C. Hardacre, J. D. Holbrey and J. S. E. McMath, Chem. Commun., 2001,
367–368.
[Emim]BF4 0.034 0.004
[BuPy]BF4 0.040 0.008
[Emim]BF4 2.600 0.003
[Emim]BF4 1.750 0.006
9 C. C. Romao, F. E. Kuhn and W. A. Hermann, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97,
3197–3246.
10 G. S. Owens and M. M. Abu-Omar, Chem. Commun., 2000,
1165–1166.
11 A. M. Al-Ajlouni and J. H. Espenson, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61,
7
8
9
[Emim]BF4 0.20 0.01
[BuPy]BF4 0.23 0.02
[Emim]BF4 3.000 0.002c
3969–3976.
12 J. H. Espenson, Chem. Commun., 1999, 479–488.
13 D. Masilamani and M. M. Rogic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100,
4634–4635.
14 A. I. Shatenshtein and L. N. VasilAeva, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1955,
95, 115–118.
15 C.-A. Chang, K. G. Cronin, D. D. Crotts, E. Dunach, T. R. Gadek and
K. P. C. Vollhardt, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1984,
1545–1546.
a Although these reactions proceed to completion using stoichiometric
amounts of reactants, a large excess of one reactant is used here to ensure
pseudo-first order conditions. UHP = Urea hydrogen peroxide complex,
MTO = methyltrioxorhenium(VII). b [Emim]BF4 = 1-ethyl-3-methylimi-
dazolium tetrafluoroborate, [BuPy]BF4
fluoroborate. c Since this is not a catalytic reaction, the reported rate
= N-(n-butyl)pyridinium tetra-
16 J. E. Baldwin and K. D. Belfield, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52,
constant is given by kobs/[CH3I].
4772–4776.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 66–67
67