Synthesis, crystal structure and 3D-QSAR studies of antifungal (bis-)1,2,4-triazole Mannich bases containing furyl and substituted piperazine moieties

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.035

A series of novel title compounds 6a-6r and 7a-7c have been synthesized by Mannich reaction of the new triazole Schiff base intermidiates, substituted piperazine and formaldehyde under mild conditions in excellent yields. The crystal structure of compound 6i was determined to show a chair conformation of the piperazine ring and an (E)-configuration of the C[dbnd]N double bond. The bioassay results indicated that most of the newly synthesized compounds exhibited excellent in vitro inhibitory activities and broader spectrum against several plant fungi, and were more effective than the control Triadimefon. Several compounds also displayed favourable in vivo antifungal activities. The relationships between the compound structures and various biological activities were discussed. Furthermore, the CoMFA calculation based on the antifungal activity data of compounds 6 against R. cerealis was carried out to establish a 3D-QSAR model, which revealed that steric and electrostatic fields were two most important factors for contributing the bioactivity of the compounds. The present work will provide significant information for guiding optimization of such new structures to develop novel agrochemicals with higher antifungal activities.

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.035

Accepted Manuscript
Title: Synthesis, crystal structure and 3D-QSAR studies of
antifungal (bis-)1,2,4-triazole Mannich bases containing furyl
and substituted piperazine moieties
Authors: Yan Zhang, Yi-Zhou Zhan, Yi Ma, Xue-Wen Hua,
Wei Wei, Xiao Zhang, Hai-Bin Song, Zheng-Ming Li,
Bao-Lei Wang
PII:
S1001-8417(17)30319-4
DOI:
Reference:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.035
CCLET 4184
To appear in:
Chinese Chemical Letters
Received date:
Revised date:
Accepted date:
27-4-2017
8-8-2017
15-8-2017
Please cite this article as: Yan Zhang, Yi-Zhou Zhan, Yi Ma, Xue-Wen Hua,
Wei Wei, Xiao Zhang, Hai-Bin Song, Zheng-Ming Li, Bao-Lei Wang, Synthesis,
crystal structure and 3D-QSAR studies of antifungal (bis-)1,2,4-triazole Mannich
bases containing furyl and substituted piperazine moieties, Chinese Chemical
Lettershttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.035
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.

Communication
Synthesis, crystal structure and 3D-QSAR studies of antifungal (bis-)1,2,4-triazole
Mannich bases containing furyl and substituted piperazine moieties
Yan Zhang, Yi-Zhou Zhan, Yi Ma, Xue-Wen Hua, Wei Wei, Xiao Zhang, Hai-Bin Song, Zheng-Ming Li,
Bao-Lei Wang
State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), College of Chemistry,
Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
Graphical abstract
This article exhibited the synthesis, crystal structure and 3D-QSAR studies of antifungal furyl- and piperazine- containing (bis-
)1,2,4-triazole Mannich bases.
ABSTRACT
A series of novel title compounds 6a-6r and 7a-7c have been synthesized by Mannich reaction of the new triazole Schiff base intermidiates, substituted
piperazine and formaldehyde under mild conditions in excellent yields. The crystal structure of compound 6i was determined to show a chair
conformation of the piperazine ring and an (E)-configuration of the C=N double bond. The bioassay results indicated that most of the newly
synthesized compounds exhibited excellent in vitro inhibitory activities and broader spectrum against several plant fungi, and were more effective than
the control Triadimefon. Several compounds also displayed favourable in vivo antifungal activities. The relationships between the compound structures
and various biological activities were discussed. Furthermore, the CoMFA calculation based on the antifungal activity data of compounds 6 against R.
cerealis was carried out to establish a 3D-QSAR model, which revealed that steric and electrostatic fields were two most important factors for
contributing the bioactivity of the compounds. The present work will provide significant information for guiding optimization of such new structures to
develop novel agrochemicals with higher antifungal activities.
Keywords:
Triazole
Furan-2-yl
Mannich base
Antifungal activity
Herbicidal activity
3D-QSAR
It is well known that the application of agrochemicals has resulted in increased yields, healthy crops and economic benefits for over
half a century. According to the FAO report, some 20%-40% of the world’s potential crop production is already lost annually because
of the effects of crop diseases, weeds and pests. Such crop losses would be doubled without using the existing agrochemicals [1]. For
example, fungal and bacterial pathogens which are recently main reasons for plant diseases have led to severe losses to agriculture and
even constituted an emerging threat to the global food security [2-4]. Undoubtedly, agrochemicals play a very important role in
agriculture industry. In view of the emergence of resistance and pollution problems associated with conventional agrochemicals, the
research and development for all kinds of agrochemicals that have novel structures, super bioactivities and eco-friendly properties are
urgently needed in the pesticide chemistry research [5,6].
Heterocyclic compounds, an important class of organic compounds, have attracted much attention in diverse areas because of their
interesting structural properties and versatile biological activities. Particularly, they are indispensable part in almost all kinds of
agrochemicals. Like many other five-membered heterocyclic compounds, triazoles are used very often in agricultural applications. The
compounds containing a triazole ring, such as 1-(substituted phenyl)-3-(1-alkoxycarboxyl alkoxy)-1,2,4-1H-triazoles have shown
versatile and useful biological properties, and been developed as herbicides, fungicides, or plant growth regulators [7]. As shown in
Fig. 1, many 1,2,4-triazole derivatives (e.g., Triadimefon) represent the most important category of fungicides to date and have
excellent protective, curative, and eradicant activity against a broad spectrum of foliar, root, and seedling diseases caused by many
ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, and imperfect fungi [8-10]. Meanwhile, some structures with a triazole ring also exhibited outstanding
———
 Corresponding author.
E-mail address: nkwbl@nankai.edu.cn (B.-L. Wang).

herbicidal activity [11,12]. For examples, the carbamoyl triazole herbicides are some of the most important agrochemicals for
controlling grass in rice fields which are widely used as pre-emergence herbicides to reduce grass and some dicotyledonous weeds in
oilseed rape, soybean, maize, and other crop fields [13,14]; The selective herbicide 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole has been used successfully
in the control of several woody species [15]; 3-Trifluoromethyl-4-aryl-1,2,4-triazole-5(4H)-thiones were also reported to possess good
herbicidal activity [12].
Likewise, as another important five-membered heterocycle, the furan ring is also associated with various useful pesticidal activities.
For example, Pefurazoate (Fig. 1) is a kind of fungicide with furan moiety [16]. In addition, piperazine-containing compounds, in spite
of having been widely applied in pharmaceutical area, also play an important role in some agrochemicals, such as the systemic
fungicide Triforine (Fig. 1), which has been found effective for the control of a number of diseases in ornamentals, cereal grains, fruits,
and vegetables [17].
It has been proved that the incorporation of different active functional groups into triazole ring is a good way to produce novel
active pesticides [18]. Encouraged by this, some 1,2,4-triazole thiones containing N-pyrimidylpiperazine and trifluoromethyl groups
were synthesized through Mannich reaction in our previous work, and found to possess significant antifungal and herbicidal activities
[19]. Particularly, those compounds possessed excellent antifungal activities against Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Corynespora
cassiicola and some other fungi as well. Recently, some pyrazole-containing triazole Mannich bases were also found to be effective for
inhibiting the growth of Rhizoctonia cerealis and Cercospora arachidicola in our lab [20]. Those previous results provided an
important initiative for us to make further structural modifications. The preliminary SAR studies have illustrated the necessity for
further optimization based on the general structure of this type of compounds, especially for the phenyl group and the substituent on
the piperazine ring part [19,20] and the modification at 3-position of 1,2,4-triazole ring is also essential. In view of all the facts above
and as continuation of our such research, hereby a series of novel 3-(furan-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazole Mannich bases and bis-Mannich bases
with various substituted piperazine and 4-substitutedbenzylideneamino moieties were synthesized in this paper (Fig. 2). Their
antifungal and herbicidal activities were investigated and the structure-activity relationships (SARs) were discussed.
It is worthy of note that heterocyclic Mannich bases are known to possess various useful properties, however, most of which were
embodied in their pharmacological activities, such as antimicrobial [21], anticancer [22], antitumor [23] and antituberculous [24]
activities. Overall, the researches of Mannich bases containing multi-heterocycle motifs in agrochemical area are relatively few, so
further exploration for this topic might provide novel agrochemical.
According to the reported procedure [25,26], the intermediate 4-amino-5-(furan-2-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol (4) was prepared
from furan-2-carboxylic acid as starting material via multi-step reactions. The intermediate 4 (10 mmol) and 4-substitutedbenzaldehyde
(11 mmol) were mixed in ethanol (15 mL) and acetic acid (5 mL). After having been refluxed for 5 h, the reaction mixture was cooled
to room temperature. The resulting crystals were filtered and washed with ethanol to give the intermediates -- Schiff base 5a-5c
(Scheme 1).
To a mixture of the intermediate 5 (1 mmol) and corresponding 4-substitutedpiperazine (1 mmol) in ethanol (15 mL), 37% formalin
(4 mmol) was added dropwise. Then the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, the resulting precipitate was filtered off (if
there is no/little precipitate formed at room temperature in some cases, the reaction mixture can be placed in a refrigerator overnight),
air-dried and recrystallized from ethanol to give compound 6 (Scheme 2).
To a mixture of the intermediate 5 (1 mmol) and anhydrous piperazine (0.5 mmol) in ethanol (15 mL), 37% formalin (3.5 mmol)
was added dropwise. Then the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, the resulting precipitate was filtered off, air-dried and
recrystallized from ethanol to give compound 7 (Scheme 2).
The in vitro antifungal activity of compounds 6 and 7 against Fusarium oxysporum, Cercospora arachidicola, Physalospora
piricola, Rhizoctonia cerealis, Alternaria solani Sorauer and Gibberella sanbinetti were tested according to reference [27,28], which
were evaluated using the mycelium growth rate test (Supporting information).
The in vivo herbicidal activities of compounds 6 and 7 were determined by the inhibition of the root growth of rape (Brassica
campestris) and inhibition of the seedling-growth of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) tests (Supporting information) according to
the reported method [29].
The three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) calculation was carried out using a Sybyl 6.91
software package [30]. And the comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) method has been performed (Supporting information)
according to our previous papers [31].
The synthetic procedures for Schiff base intermediates 5a-5c are shown in Scheme 1 and for the title (bis-)Mannich base compounds
6 and 7 in Scheme 2. The key intermediate 5 can be efficiently prepared from the condensation of intermediate amino-triazol-thiol (4)
and substituted benzaldehyde in ethanol-acetic acid system under reflux. By Mannich reaction of Schiff base 5, various 4-
(substitutedbenzyl)piperazine, or 4-phenylpiperazine, or 4-(substitutedpyrimidin-2-yl)piperazine, or 4-(2-pyridyl)piperazine, and
formaldehyde in ethanol at room temperature for 2 h led to novel triazole Mannich bases 6a-6r in excellent yields ( > 84%), which

indicates such reaction has noticeable advantages, thus, it may be a favourable factor during its possible industrial application. Under
conditions of excess formaldehyde and 2:1 molar ratio of Schiff base 5 and anhydrous piperazine, novel furan-containing bis(1,2,4-
triazole Mannich base) 7a-7c were prepared conveniently in 92%-97% yield using the same procedure. From these reaction results it
can be confirmed that the thione-form of the Schiff base 5 took part in the Mannich reaction with its α–NH of thiocarbonyl group
(C=S), though it can exist in thiol-form as shown in Scheme 1.
1
Compounds 6 and 7 were identified by melting point, IR, H NMR and 13C NMR spectra (Supporting information). The measured
1
elemental analyses data were also consistent with the corresponding calculated values (Supporting information). In H NMR, the –
N=CH– proton showed up at δ 10.17–10.52. The piperazine ring proton signals of compounds 6a-6r were observed at two positions,
however, due to the symmetrical structure of compounds 7a-7c, they were observed as a singlet at δ ~ 2.94. In 13C NMR, the typical
carbon signal at δ ~ 163.3 was derived from the resonance of thiocarbonyl group (C=S). The piperazine carbons of compounds 7a-7c
also appeared as one signal at δ ~ 50.5 as opposed to two signals in compounds 6a-6r. In addition, due to the “F” splitting, the signals
of CF3 carbon and carbons adjacent to CF3 or F group were split into quartet or multiplet, or doublet. In IR spectra of these compounds,
the stretching vibration absorption bands of C=S and C=N appeared at 1161-1175 cm-1 and 1599-1621 cm-1, respectively.
The structure of compound 6i was further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Fig. 3). From the molecular
structure it can be seen that both groups (triazole-CH2 and phenyl) on the N atoms of piperazine ring are in the e-bond positions of
chair conformation in the six-membered ring. The dihedral angle between furan ring and triazole ring is 3.945°, which means the two
rings are almost coplanar. While the dihedral angle between 4-fluorobenzene ring and the triazole ring is 35.021°, which indicates the
two rings are not coplanar in the molecular structure. The X-ray analysis also reveals that, in this typical structure (6i), the substituted
benzene ring and the triazole ring are on the opposite sides of the C=N double bond. The torsion angle of C(2)-C(1)-N(1)-N(2) is -
178.572°, which indicates that the C=N double bond is in the (E)-configuration.
The in vitro antifungal results of the Mannich bases 6a-6r and bis-Mannich bases 7a-7c in inhibiting the mycelial growth of six test
fungi are shown in Table 1. As indicated in Table 1, most of the compounds exhibited significant in vitro antifungal activities against
Fusarium oxysporum, Cercospora arachidicola, Physalospora piricola and Rhizoctonia cerealis at 50 mg/L concentration. For
Fusarium oxysporum, compounds 6a, 6b and 6e whose inhibition activities were 90.0%, 57.5% and 60.0% respectively, were more
effective than Tridimefon (50.0%). Especially, 6a held 1.8-fold and 1.2-fold inhibitory rates of commercial controls Tridimefon and
Chlorothalonil (75.0%), respectively. It was found that most of compounds containing a 4-chlorophenyl group (R1 = Cl) in the Schiff
base moiety of such structures showed more favourable antifungal activities against Fusarium oxysporum than the others. Compounds
6a, 6b, 6f, 6g, 6i, 6k, 6m, 6n, 6p, 6q and 6r possessed 31.0% ~ 41.4% inhibitory rates against Cercospora arachidicola, which are
similar with that of Tridimefon (34.5%). For this fungus, when R1 = F, R2 = phenyl and dimethylpyrimidyl (6i and 6k), the
corresponding compounds were found to have higher activities than the others. Noticeably, all of the title compounds exhibited
excellent antifungal activities against Physalospora piricola, and most of them were more effective than the control Tridimefon. In
particular, compounds 6b, 6e, 6i, 6j, 6l, 6m, 6o, 6p and 6q showed inhibitory rates of 75.0% ~ 95.3% (Tridimefon: 53.1%), which
definitely offered us important clue to make further structural optimization for the discovery of novel fungicides against Physalospora
piricola in the future. Interestingly, the SAR showed that trifluoromethyl-containing compounds (R1 = CF3) have obvious advantage
over others. For Rhizoctonia cerealis, most of the compounds held excellent inhibitory rates (80.2% ~ 97.5%). Especially, compounds
6b, 6i, 6m, 6p, 6q and 6r with inhibitory rates of 95.1%, 96.3%, 95.1%, 95.1%, 95.1% and 97.5%, respectively, were more effective
than Tridimefon (93.8%). It was also found that trifluoromethyl-containing compounds (R1 = CF3) showed superiority to the others.
For Alternaria solani Sorauer and Gibberella sanbinetti, all of the compounds exhibited fair antifungal activities.
By analyzing the SAR based on these antifungal activity data (Table 1) of the title compounds, we can make the conclusions as
follows: The Mannich base compounds 6 held better antifungal activities than those of the bis-Mannich base compounds 7; Those
compounds containing CF3 or Cl group (in the Schiff base motif) were more effective than those of F-containing compounds in most of
cases; Compounds 6a, 6b, 6e, 6i, 6k, 6m, 6p, 6q and 6r possessed not only excellent antifungal activities, but also comparatively
broader spectrum (at least effective for three kinds of fungi) and were comparable with the commercial fungicide Triadimefon.
Therefore, further structural optimizations could be made for the discovery and development of novel fungicides in the future
according to these results.
Some compounds with high antifungal potency were further investigated at different concentrations against Fusarium oxysporum
and Physalospora piricola for EC50 values. These EC50 test results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. We can see that compounds 6a,
6b and 6e against Fusarium oxysporum possessed higher EC50 values than those of the controls Chlorothalonil and Carbendazim, but
lower EC50 values than that of the control Triadimefon (Table 2), which indicates the consistency with the results in Table 1. In
particular, 6a held excellent antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum with EC50 value of 9.49 mg/L (much lower than EC50
47.90 mg/L of Triadimefon). Against Physalospora piricola, all the tested compounds in Table 3 possessed EC50 values of 9.14 mg/L ~
20.2 mg/L, much lower than that of Triadimefon (36.5 mg/L). Especially, 6m (10.9 mg/L), 6q (10.4 mg/L) and 6r (9.14 mg/L) were
almost at the same antifungal level of Chlorothalonil (7.33 mg/L).
The herbicidal activity data of the title compounds are listed in Table 1, commercial herbicide Chlorsulfuron was used as control. It
was observed from Table 1 that most of the compounds showed apparent herbicidal activities at 100 μg/mL concentration according to

the rape (Brassica campestris) root and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) cup tests in the preliminary studies, especially against
Brassica campestris. For examples, compounds 6b, 6e, 6h, 6k, 7a and 7b exhibited inhibitory activities of 34.7% ~ 56.7% against the
rape root growth. The bioactivity of compounds 6a-6r, when R2 was fixed as the same substituent, indicated the sequence of herbicidal
activity F > Cl > CF3 in the Schiff base moiety of such structures (R1); The activities of these compounds, where R1 was fixed as the
same substituent, indicated the approximate trend 2,4-dichlorobenzyl > 4-chlorobenzyl, 4,6-dimethylpyrimidyl > 4-methylpyrimidyl,
2-pyridyl, phenyl in the piperazine moiety (R2). Similarly, the SAR of compounds 7a-7c also showed the herbicidal activity sequence F
> Cl > CF3 (R1).
Based on the antifungal activity data of compounds 6 against R. cerealis showed in Table 1, CoMFA calculation was carried out to
establish a 3D-QSAR model. The compound 6i, owing to the availability of its crystal structure and the best bioactivity to R. cerealis,
was used as a template to build the other molecular structures (Fig. 4). Among 15 compounds, 6d, 6e, 6q were picked randomly as the
test set of the CoMFA model. The experimental and predicted antifungal activity (R. cerealis) of 3D-QSAR were shown in Table S1
(Supporting information). A correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.872 and a cross validated coefficient of q2 = 0.527 were obtained as the
best CoMFA model. The optimal number of component, standard error of estimate (S) and F value was 3, 0.363 and 31.014,
respectively. The final CoMFA model was satisfactory with respect to both statistical significance and the predictive ability of the
training set and test set.
In Fig. 5, the isocontour diagrams of the steric and electrostatic field contributions obtained from the CoMFA analysis are
illustrated. The steric field contour map is plotted in Fig. 5a. The green displays 2 positions -- the para position of
substituedbenzylideneamino and ortho position of phenylpiperazine, where a bulky group would be favourable for higher antifungal
activity. In contrast, yellow indicates positions where a decrease in the bulk of the target molecules is favoured. For example, when R1
= CF3 the compounds, such as 6m, 6o, 6p, and 6q, displayed higher antifungal activity than others (R1 = Cl or F). As shown in Fig. 5b,
the CoMFA electrostatic contour plots obviously indicated that the blue contour defines a region where an increase in the positive
charge will result in an increase in the activity, whereas the red contour (the para position and ortho position of phenylpiperazine)
defines a region of space where increasing electron density is favourable. The target compounds bearing an electron-donating group at
the 2- or 4- position of the benzene ring or an electron-withdrawing group at the position of the benzyl ring, such as 6a and 6b,
displayed higher activity. These results provide useful information for further optimization of the compounds.
In summary, a series of novel piperazine-containing 3-(furan-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazole Mannich bases and bis-Mannich bases have been
conveniently synthesized via Mannich reaction under mild conditions in excellent yields. The preliminary bioassays showed that most
of compounds exhibited significant in vitro antifungal activities towards several plant fungi. Particularly, compounds 6a, 6b, 6e, 6i, 6k,
6m, 6p, 6q and 6r exhibited not only excellent in vitro antifungal activities but also broader spectrum, and were comparable with the
commercial fungicide Triadimefon against several test fungi. Meanwhile, some of the compounds showed apparent herbicidal activities
against Brassica campestris. The SARs of the synthesized compounds have been summarized according to their various biological
activities. In addition, the 3D-QSAR study result revealed that steric and electrostatic fields had great impact on the biological activity
of the compounds, which will provide useful information for guiding further optimizations of such new structures to develop novel
heterocyclic compounds with higher antifungal activities.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21372133) and Tianjin Natural Science
Foundation (No. 17JCYBJC19900). We thank Dr. Yong-Hong Li of the Biological Assay Center, Nankai University, for kind bioassay
assistance of compounds.

References
[1] E.C. Oerke, H.W. Dehne, Crop Prot. 23 (2004) 275-285.
[2] Y.B. Bai, A.L. Zhang, J.J. Tang, J.M. Gao, J. Agric. Food Chem. 61 (2013) 2789-2795.
[3] J. Thornton, Pure Appl. Chem. 73 (2001) 1231-1236.
[4] X.F. Cao, M. Hu, J. Zhang, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (2009) 6914-6919.
[5] L.L. McConnell, K.D. Racke, C.J. Hapeman, J.N. Seiber, J. Agric. Food Chem. 64 (2016) 4-5.
[6] L.Y. Zhang, B.L. Wang, Y.Z. Zhan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 (2016) 163-167.
[7] W. Li, Q. Wu, Y. Ye, et al., Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 60 (2004) 2343-2354.
[8] K.M. Crofton, Toxicol. Lett. 84 (1996) 155-159.
[9] J.L. García Ruano, M. Cifuentes García, A.M. Martín Castro, J.H. Rodríguez Ramos, Org. Lett. 4 (2002) 55-57.
[10] E. Menegola, M.L. Broccia, F.D. Renzo, E. Giavini, Reprod. Toxicol. 15 (2001) 421-427.
[11] X.Z. Li, Z.X. Si, Pesticides 42 (2003) 4-5.
[12] K.A. Simmons, J.A. Dixson, B.P. Halling, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 40 (1992) 297-305.
[13] T. Sakamoto, T. Honma, Patent, JP 07173020, 1995 (Chem. Abstr. 1995, 123, No. 220839).
[14] T. Honma, T. Sakamoto, M. Teramura, Patent, JP 07173016, 1995 (Chem. Abstr. 1995, 123, No. 220838).
[15] A.W. Naylor, J. Agric. Food Chem. 12 (1964) 21-25.
[16] B. Liu, F. Zhu, Y. Huang, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 (2010) 2673-2684.
[17] J.B. Bourke, T.R. Nelsen, D. Eichler, J. Agric. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 36-39.
[18] H.W. He, L.P. Meng, L.M. Hu, Z.J. Liu, Chin. J. Pest. Sci. 4 (2002) 14-18.
[19] B.L. Wang, Y.X. Shi, Y. Ma, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 (2010) 5515-5522.
[20] B.L. Wang, L.Y. Zhang, Y.Z. Zhan, et al., J. Fluorine Chem. 184 (2016) 36-44.
[21] H. Bayrak, A. Demirbas, S.A. Karaoglu, N. Demirbas, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2009) 1057-1066.
[22] S.A. Ahmed, M. Hamdy, R.N. Abdel, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006) 1236-1246.
[23] Y. Chen, G. Wang, N. Duan, et al., Chin. J. Appl. Chem. 29 (2012) 1246-1250.
[24] S.N. Pandeya, D. Sriram, P. Yogeeswari, S. Ananthan, Chemotherapy 47 (2001) 266-269.
[25] K.K. Jha, A. Samad, Y. Kumar, et al., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 4963-4967.
[26] J. Wu, X. Liu, X. Cheng, et al., Molecules 12 (2007) 2003-2016.
[27] Z. Liu, G. Yang, X. Qin, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76 (2001) 1154-1158.
[28] B. Wang, Y. Shi, Y. Zhan, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 33 (2015) 1124-1134.
[29] B.L.Wang, R.G. Duggleby, Z.M. Li, et al., Pest Manag. Sci. 61 (2005) 407-412.
[30] SYBYL 6.9, Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO.
[31] W. Wei, D.D. Cheng, J.B. Liu, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 14 (2016) 8356-8366.

Fig. 1. The structures of some commercial fungicides containing 1,2,4-triazole, piperazine and furan heterocycles
Fig. 2. Design of the title compounds.
Fig. 3. X-ray structure of compound 6i.
Fig. 4. Superimposition of compounds 6 for 3D-QSAR studies.
Fig. 5. Contour plot of CoMFA steric field (a) and electrostatic field (b).
Scheme 1. The synthesis of the intermediates 5a-5c. Reagents and conditions: (i) EtOH, H2SO4, reflux, 7 h; (ii) NH2NH2·H2O, EtOH, reflux, 6 h; (iii) CS2,
KOH, EtOH, reflux, 7 h; (iv) NH2NH2·H2O, EtOH, reflux, 7 h; (v) 4-Substitutedbenzaldehyde, EtOH, AcOH, 5 h.

Scheme 2. The synthesis of title compounds 6a-6r and 7a-7c.

Table 1
Biological activities of the title compounds.
Compd.
Antifungal activity, inhibition rate (%, 50 μg/mL)
Herbicidal activity, inhibition
rate (%, 100 μg/mL)
Fusarium
oxysporum
90.0
57.5
32.5
40.0
60.0
32.5
17.5
20.0
32.5
15.0
32.5
35.0
22.5
17.5
10.0
40.0
32.5
27.5
10.0
7.5
Cercospora
arachidicola piricola
Physalospora
Rhizoctonia Alternaria
solani Sorauer
Gibberella
sanbinetti
9.1
27.3
27.3
9.1
22.7
22.7
9.1
13.6
13.6
27.3
18.2
18.2
36.4
18.2
27.3
18.2
13.6
9.1
13.6
27.3
13.6
45.5
72.2
NT
Brassica
campestris
17.4
37.9
0
0
44.1
0
Echinochloa
cerealis
90.1
95.1
81.5
67.9
84.0
82.7
80.2
53.1
96.3
76.5
93.8
88.9
95.1
84.0
93.8
95.1
95.1
97.5
60.5
48.1
53.1
93.8
NT
crusgalli
2.0
3.0
10.0
5.0
0
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
6h
6i
6j
6k
6l
6m
6n
6o
6p
31.0
37.9
27.6
20.7
27.6
31.0
31.0
20.7
41.4
27.6
41.4
27.6
34.5
37.9
17.2
31.0
31.0
34.5
13.8
13.8
10.3
34.5
NT
60.9
75.0
26.6
57.8
79.7
43.8
34.4
46.9
75.0
67.2
57.8
75.0
95.3
65.6
75.0
75.0
89.1
92.2
35.9
39.1
54.7
53.1
100
29.4
29.4
35.3
23.5
29.4
29.4
23.5
23.5
29.4
35.3
17.6
35.3
35.3
29.4
23.5
23.5
29.4
23.5
17.6
35.3
17.6
52.9
NT
0
0
21.0
56.7
8.6
10.0
2.0
5.0
12.0
0
5.0
5.0
0
12.0
0
10.0
5.0
0
8.6
44.6
24.0
4.7
22.0
0
5.7
9.0
10.6
40.1
34.7
0
6q
6r
7a
7b
7c
10.0
50.0
75.0
NT
5.0
NT
NT
29.9
Triadimefon
Chlorothalonil
Chlorsulfuron
NT: not tested.
NT
NT
80.4
NT
NT
NT
NT

Table 2
The EC50 value of the compounds against Fusarium oxysporum.
Compd.
EC50 (mg/L) y = ax + b
R
6a
6b
6e
9.49
y = 2.0706x + 2.9759 0.9792
y = 1.7252x + 2.2601 0.9864
y = 1.4851x + 2.6590 0.9773
y = 1.9148x + 1.7828 0.9831
y = 1.2151x + 4.8806 0.9815
y = 2.1326x + 5.9463 0.9995
38.74
37.70
47.90
Triadimefon
Chlorothalonil 1.25
Carbendazim
0.36
Table 3
The EC50 value of the compounds against Physalospora piricola.
Compd.
6a
6b
6e
6i
6l
6m
6o
EC50 (mg/L)
19.5
15.5
13.8
16.1
20.2
10.9
16.6
17.1
10.4
9.14
36.5
7.33
y = ax + b
R
y = 1.4665x + 3.1090
y = 1.6426x + 3.0432
y = 1.5263x + 3.2610
y = 1.6282x + 3.0337
y = 1.6081x + 2.8992
y = 1.9362x + 2.9936
y = 1.4304x + 3.2537
y = 1.2278x + 3.4867
y = 1.6602x + 3.3100
y = 1.7002x + 3.3660
y = 1.2673x + 3.0201
y = 1.3890x + 3.7981
y = 2.1326x + 5.9463
0.9935
0.9988
0.9991
0.9938
1.6081
0.9937
0.9990
0.9951
0.9981
0.9882
0.9857
0.9862
0.9995
6p
6q
6r
Triadimefon
Chlorothalonil
Carbendazim
0.36