Table 1 Rh(I)-catalysed reaction of isocyanates 1 (R1NCO) with
organoboronic acids 2 (R2B(OH)2)a
Entry 1 R1
2
R2
3
Yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
2b 4-MeC6H4
2c 2-MeC6H4
2d 3-MeOC6H4
2e 3-BrC6H4
2f 3-ClC6H4
2g 3-Thienyl
2h b-Styryl
3ab 88
3ac 90
3ad 84
3ae 58
3af 21
3ag 94
3ah 91
(2)
2i (E)-Pent-1-enyl 3ai 73
9
1b 4-MeC6H4
1c 3-MeC6H4
1d 2-MeC6H4
1e 4-MeOC6H4
1f 4-ClC6H4
1g 4-EtO2CC6H4
1h 3-O2NC6H4
1i 2-(1-Pent-1-enyl)-C6H4 2a Ph
1j n-Hexyl
1k Cyclohexyl
1k Cyclohexyl
2a Ph
2a Ph
2a Ph
2a Ph
2a Ph
2a9 Ph (R2BO)3
2a9 Ph (R2BO)3
3ba 84
3ca 84
3da 68
3ea 78
3fa 76
3ga 83c
3ha 74c
3ia 90
3ja 75
3ka 62
3ka 93c
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
a
(3)
2a Ph
2a Ph
2a9 Ph (R2BO)3
1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.6 mmol), [Rh(OH)(cod)]2 (5 mol% Rh) in THF
(0.1 M) at room temperature for 12 h under Ar unless otherwise
noted.
b
Isolated yields of products with .95% purity after
c
18032040 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology, Japan.
chromatography. 1 (0.2 mmol), phenylboroxine (2a9, 0.2 mmol,
3.0 equiv. of B), [Rh(OH)(cod)]2 (5 mol% Rh) in dioxane (0.1 M) at
100 uC for 12 h under Ar.
Notes and references
{ General procedure: To an oven-dried flask was added [Rh(OH)(cod)]2
(2.3 mg, 5.0 mmol, 5 mol% Rh), organoboronic acid 2 (0.60 mmol,
3.0 equiv.) and a solution of isocyanate 1 (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in dry
THF (2.0 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for
12 h under an argon atmosphere, and then quenched with addition of
water (2.0 mL). The resulting aqueous solution was extracted with ethyl
acetate (4 6 10 mL). The combined extracts were washed with brine and
dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and
the residue was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography
(chloroform–ethyl acetate 20 : 1 or 10 : 1) to give the corresponding
amide 3.
wide range of substituents were tolerated on the aryl group of 1
(entries 12–16). Substrates 1g and 1h possessing electron-with-
drawing ester and nitro groups on the benzene rings, respectively,
were reacted with phenylboroxine (2a9) in place of 2a in order to
suppress a potentially competitive hydrolysis–decarboxylation
pathway that would generate the corresponding aniline derivatives
(entries 14 and 15). The successful results obtained with 1g and 1h
demonstrated that ester and nitro groups, which would be affected
by Grignard reagents, are compatible with the present reaction
conditions. In addition, alkyl isocyanate 1j and 1k also reacted
with either 2a or 2a9 (entries 17–19).
1 For reviews, see: (a) K. Fagnou and M. Lautens, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
169; (b) T. Hayashi and K. Yamasaki, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 2829; (c)
T. Miura and M. Murakami, Chem. Commun., 2007, 217.
We next carried out the following competitive experiments to
directly assess the reactivity of a phenylrhodium(I) species toward
an isocyanate, an electron-deficient alkene and an aldehyde. Thus,
a mixture of phenyl isocyanate (1a, 1.0 equiv.) and cyclohex-2-en-
1-one (4, 1.0 equiv.) was treated with phenylboronic acid (2a,
2.0 equiv.) in the presence of [Rh(OH)(cod)]2 (5 mol% Rh). After
the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature, the
corresponding adducts 3aa and 5 were isolated in 73% and 15%
yields, respectively [eqn (2)]. Contrary to our expectation on the
basis of functional group polarity, the isocyanate 1a was a better
acceptor for phenylrhodium(I) species than cyclohex-2-en-1-one
(4). An analogous competition experiment using 1a and benzal-
dehyde (6) resulted in the formation of 3aa in 68% yield and a trace
of 7 [less than 5% yield, eqn (3)]. These results indicate that the
electrophilic reactivities toward phenylrhodium(I) nucleophiles are
approximately isocyanate . electron-deficient alkene & aldehyde.
In summary, the rhodium-catalysed addition reaction of
organoboronic acids to isocyanates provides a convenient method
for the construction of secondary amides. Further synthetic
applications of the present reaction are currently under way.
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Young
Scientists (B) 18750084 and Scientific Research on Priority Areas
2 (a) M. Sakai, M. Ueda and N. Miyaura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998,
37, 3279; (b) M. Pucheault, S. Darses and J.-P. Geneˆt, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2004, 126, 15356; (c) S. U. Son, S. B. Kim, J. A. Reingold,
G. B. Carpenter and D. A. Sweigart, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
12238; (d) K. Suzuki, K. Kondo and T. Aoyama, Synthesis, 2006, 1360.
3 (a) M. Ueda, A. Saito and N. Miyaura, Synlett, 2000, 1637; (b)
M. Kuriyama, T. Soeta, X. Hao, Q. Chen and K. Tomioka, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 8128; (c) N. Tokunaga, Y. Otomaru,
K. Okamoto, K. Ueyama, R. Shintani and T. Hayashi, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2004, 126, 13584; (d) M. A. Beenen, D. J. Weix and J. A. Ellman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6304; (e) R. B. C. Jagt, P. Y. Toullec,
D. Geerdink, J. G. de Vries, B. L. Feringa and A. J. Minnaard, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 2789.
4 (a) K. Ueura, T. Satoh and M. Miura, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 2229; (b)
H. Shimizu and M. Murakami, Chem. Commun., 2007, 2855.
5 (a) M. Sakai, H. Hayashi and N. Miyaura, Organometallics, 1997, 16,
4229; (b) J.-F. Paquin, C. Defieber, C. R. J. Stephenson and
E. M. Carreira, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 10850; (c) C. G. Frost,
S. D. Penrose, K. Lambshead, P. R. Raithby, J. E. Warren and
R. Gleave, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 2119; (d) W.-L. Duan, H. Iwamura,
R. Shintani and T. Hayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 2130 and
references therein.
6 (a) T. Hayashi, K. Inoue, N. Taniguchi and M. Ogasawara, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 9918; (b) M. Murakami and H. Igawa, Helv.
Chim. Acta, 2002, 85, 4182; (c) M. Lautens and M. Yoshida, Org. Lett.,
2002, 4, 123; (d) E. Genin, V. Michelet and J.-P. Geneˆt, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2004, 45, 4157.
3578 | Chem. Commun., 2007, 3577–3579
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007