198
H. I. Gul et al.
Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2007, 340, 195–201
1
13
Table 3. H-NMR and C-NMR data of Mannich chalcones 2a–e.
1
13
Compound
H-NMR (d)
C-NMR (d)
2
2
2
2
a
b
c
1.80–1.30 (m, 6H, 26C18-H, 26C19-H, 26C20-H), 3.20–2.00
188.8 (C9), 163.7 (C13), 143.8 (C7), 135.4 (C1), 130.5
(C11), 130.4 (C15), 129.8 (C10), 129.6 (C3 and C5),
129.1 (C4), 128.6 (C2 and C6), 122.1 (C8), 121.9
(
m, 4H, 26C17-H, 26C21-H), 3.75 (s, 2H, 26C16-H), 6.86 (d, 1H,
3
C14-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz), 7.43–7.36 (m, 3H, C3-H, C4-H, C5-H), 7.55
3
(B part of AB system, d, 1H, C8-H, J7,8= 15.8 Hz), 7.63 (dd, 1H, C2-H (C12), 116.2 (C14), 62.1 (C16), 54.0 (C17 and C21),
3 3 4 4
and C6-H, J2,3= J5,6= 7.4 Hz, J2,4= J4,6= 2.2 Hz ), 7.76 (brs, 1H, C11-H, 26.0 (C18, C20), 24.0 (C19).
overlapped with C7-H signal), 7.78 (A part of AB system, d, 1H, C7-
3
3
4
H, J7,8= 15.8 Hz), 7.91 (dd, 1H, C15-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz, J11,15= 2.2 Hz ) ,
0.22 (brs, 1H, Ar-OH).
1.70–1.20 (m, 6H, 26C18-H, 26C19-H, 26C20-H), 3.20–2.00
m, 4H, 26C17-H, 2x C21-H), 3.74 (s, 2H, 26C16-H), 6.84 (d, 1H,
1
188.3 (C9), 163.8 (C13), 142.2 (C7), 136.2 (C1), 134.0
(C4), 130.4 (C11), 129.8 (C15), 129.7 (C3 and C5),
129.5 (C10), 129.4 (C2 and C6), 122.5 (C8), 121.9
(C12), 116.2 (C14), 62.0 (C16), 54.0 (C17 and C21),
26.0 (C18, C20), 24.0 (C19).
(
3
C14-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz), 7.35 (B part of AB system, d, 2H, C3-H and
3
3
C5-H, J2,3= J5,6= 8.4 Hz ), 7.50 (B part of AB system, d, 1H, C8-H,
3
J
J
7,8= 15.6 Hz), 7.54 (A part of AB system, d, 2H, C2-H and C6-H,
3
3
3
2,3= J5,6= 8.4 Hz), 7.70 (A part of AB system, d, 1H, C7-H, J7,8= 15.6
3
4
Hz), 7.74 (brs, 1H, C11-H), 7.88 (dd, 1H, C15-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz, J11,15
1.8 Hz ) , 11.64 (brs, 1H, Ar-OH).
1.80–1.30 (m, 6H, 26C18-H, 26C19-H, 26C20-H), 3.20–2.00
m, 4H, 26C17-H, 26C21-H), 3.76 (s, 2H, 26C16-H), 3,85 (s, 3H,
=
188.8 (C9), 163.4 (C13), 161.6 (C4), 143.6 (C7), 130.3
(C2 and C6), 130.2 (C11), 129.9 (C10), 129.8 (C15),
(
3
OCH3), 6.86 (d, 1H, C14-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz), 6.93 (B part of AB system, 128.2 (C1), 121.8 (C12), 119.8 (C8), 116.1 (C14),
d, 2H, C3-H and C5-H, J2,3= J5,6= 8.8 Hz ), 7.43 (B part of AB system, 114.6 (C3 and C5), 62.1 (C16), 55.6 (C22), 54.1 (C17
d, 1H, C8-H, J7,8= 15.6 Hz), 7.60 (A part of AB system, d, 2H, C2-H
and C6-H, J2,3= J5,6= 8.8 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, C11-H, J11,15= 2.0), 7.76
3
3
3
and C21), 26.0 (C18 and C20), 24.1 (C19).
3
3
4
3
(
A part of AB system, d, 1H, C7-H, J7,8= 15.6 Hz), 7.90 (dd, 1H, C15-H,
3
4
J
14,15= 8.4 Hz, J11,15= 2.0 Hz ) , 9.86 (brs, 1H, Ar-OH).
d
1.80–1.20 (m, 6H, 26C18-H, 26C19-H, 26C20-H), 2.39 (s, 3H,
Ar-CH3), 3.20–2.00 (m, 4H, 26C17-H, 26C21-H), 3.76 (s, 2H,
188.7 (C9), 163.5 (C13), 143.9 (C7), 140.9 (C4), 132.7
(C1), 130.3 (C11), 129.9 (C2 and C6), 129.8 (C10),
128.6 (C3 and C5), 121.8 (C12), 121.1 (C8), 116.2
(C14), 62.1 (C16), 54.1 (C17 and C21), 26.0 (C18 and
C20), 24.2 (C19), 21.8 (C22).
3
2
6C16-H), 6.86 (d, 1H, C14-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz), 7.21 (B part of AB
3
3
system, d, 2H, C3-H and C5-H, J2,3= J5,6= 8.3 Hz ), 7.50 (B part of
3
AB system, d, 1H, C8-H, J7,8= 15.8 Hz), 7.54 (A part of AB system,
d, 2H, C2-H and C6-H, J2,3= J5,6= 8.3 Hz), 7.76 (brs, 1H, C11-H,
overlapped with C7-H signal), 7.77 (A part of AB system, d, 1H,
C7-H, J7,8= 15.8 Hz), 7.90 (dd, 1H, C15-H, J14,15= 8.4 Hz, J11,15= 2.2
Hz), 10.40 (brs, 1H, Ar-OH).
3
3
3
3
4
2e
1.80–1.20 (m, 6H, 26C16-H, 26C17-H, 26C18-H), 3.20–2.00
188.1 (C7), 163.7 (C11), 140.9 (C1), 136.3 (C5), 131.8
(C9), 130.3 (C4), 129.8 (C13), 129.5 (C8), 128.5 (C1;
(
m, 4H, 26C15-H, 26C19-H), 3.75 (s, 2H, 26C14-H), 6.85 (d, 1H,
3
3
3
C12-H, J13,14= 8.4 Hz), 7.07 (dd, 1H, C3-H, J3,4= 3.7 Hz, J4,5= 5.1 Hz, C2, C3), 121.9 (C10), 120.9 (C6), 116.2 (C12), 62.1
7
C6-H, J6,7= 15.0 Hz), 7.38 (d, 1H, C4-H, J4,5= 5.1 Hz), 7.73 (d, 1H,
C9-H, J10,14= 2.0 Hz), 7.88 (dd, 1H, C13-H, J13,14= 8.4 Hz, J10,14= 2.0
3
.32 (d, 1H, C2-H, J3,4= 3.7 Hz), 7.33 (B part of AB system, d, 1H,
(C14), 54.0 (C15 and C19), 26.0 (C16 and C18), 24.0
(C17).
3
3
4
3
4
3
Hz, 7.91 (A part of AB system, d, 1 H, C5-H, J6,7= 15.0 Hz), 10.67
(brs, 1H, Ar-OH).
(MR) [23] of aryl substituents as well as the partition coef- 1.39 times, respectively, when compared with the precur-
ficient (log P) of compounds 1a–e. Calculation of the par- sor 49-hydroxychalcones. Although not reaching the sig-
tition coefficient was carried out using Chem. Office nificance level, the IC50 figures of 2a–d were negatively
ultra 7.0 software. Hence, the future molecular modifica- correlated with sigma (r) constants (r = –0.943, p =
tion should include the preparation of 3-chloro analo- 0.057), pi (p) constants (r = –0.924, p = 0.076). These
gues following the decision-tree approach [24]. The bio- results suggested that the potency increases (lower IC50
)
data generated from 3-chloro analogues would guide the with the increase of hydrophobicity and electron–with-
future modifications of 49-hydroxychalcones. Incorpora- drawing properties of the aryl substituents. Thus, future
tion of the 39-piperidinomethyl group in 49-hydroxychal- molecular modifications should place strongly hydro-
cones led to the formation of 2a–e. Compound 2b was phobic and electron-attracting substituent in the aryli-
the most potent compound (IC50 = 3.7 lM) among all the dene aryl ring such as 3,4-dichloro (r = 0.60, p = 1.42), 4-
compounds in series 1 and 2 and was 2.5 times less potent trifluoromethyl (r = 0.54, p = 0.88), 3-trifluoromethyl (r =
than 5-fluorouracil. Compound 2d showed moderate 0.43, p = 0.88), 3-chloro (r = 0.37, p = 0.71), and 4-bromo
activity, whereas 2a, 2c, and 2e were weakly active. The (r = 0.23, p = 0.86) groups. A significant correlation (r = –
cytotoxic potency of 2b, 2d, and 2e rose by 1.68, 2.19, and 0.95, p = 0.05) was noted between IC50 figures and log P
i
2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.archpharm.com