8
360
M. F. Mohd Mustapa et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 8359–8362
this was then converted to mesylate 4 and reacted with
sodium iodide to give iodoalanine 5. At this point, the
presence of two distinct isomeric forms was observed in
this chiral centre does not occur during the coupling of
iodoalanines to cysteine. We independently corrobo-
rated these observations by the synthesis of the
9
1
the H NMR spectrum, in a ratio of between 2:1 and
diastereomeric 9 from L-serine, via 10 and 11 (Scheme
13
13
1
3
:2 (dependent on the reaction temperature). Dugave
2). As before, two isomers were observed in the H
NMR spectra of 10 and 11, and the two isomers
observed for 11 were different from those observed for
and M e´ nez had also observed the presence of two
1
isomers in the H NMR spectrum when synthesising
15
iodoalanines such as 6. In the original report, this was
attributed to the presence of at least two rotameric
forms of the iodoalanines in which the conformations
were locked due to the steric bulk of the trityl and iodo
moieties.
7
.
1
13
A H– C HSQC spectrum was acquired on iodoala-
nine 5, and this revealed that the chemical shift of the
a-carbon in the major component was ꢀ30 ppm
upfield of that in the minor component (20.1 ppm
versus 55.8 ppm), and that of the b-carbon was ꢀ40
ppm downfield (48.2 ppm versus 9.55 ppm). These
chemical shifts are only compatible with attachment of
iodine at the a-carbon in the major component and at
the b-carbon in the minor component (Fig. 1a). This
implies that the major component resulting from the
reaction of mesylate 4 with NaI is the regioisomer 12,
and the minor component is the desired 5, not rotamers
as previously reported. In order to confirm these obser-
vations, we carried out an HMBC experiment on the
Again following the published procedure, 5 was reacted
t
with Fmoc-Cys-O Bu in the presence of Cs CO to give
2
3
lanthionine 7 in excellent yield. Removal of the trityl
group and replacement with Aloc to give 8, followed by
removal of the tert-butyl ester, appeared to afford 2,
with the desired orthogonal protecting groups for
SPPS. Dugave and M e´ nez had also reported the pres-
ence of two rotameric forms for lanthionines formed
from iodoalanines such as 6, and indeed we also
1
observed two clearly distinct sets of H NMR signals
for 7, in ratios as high as 4:1. However, we were
disturbed to find that, even on removal of the bulky
trityl group and its replacement by Aloc, multiple
isomers were still observed in the NMR spectrum.
Moreover, although these compounds appeared homo-
geneous by tlc, careful HPLC of 5 and 8 revealed two
peaks. Compound 5 was partially resolved by prepara-
tive HPLC, and 8 was completely separated to give two
3
mixture of lanthionine isomers 7 (Fig. 1b). J Correla-
tions between the b-CH on the Fmoc-protected side of
2
the lanthionine and the a-C on the trityl-protected side
and also between the a-CH on the Fmoc-protected side
of the lanthionine and the b-C on the trityl-protected
side were observed for the major isomer. This is only
compatible with the formation of the regioisomer 13
from the major component 12. Finally, the complexity
of the spectra suggested that a mixture of two
diastereoisomers of 13 is formed, resulting from racemi-
sation of the a-iodo-b-alanine 12.
1
4
distinct isomers (Scheme 1).
Clearly these results threw doubt on the original assign-
ment of these isomers as the result of restricted rota-
tion. Two other possibilities remained; diastereoisomers
a
resulting from racemisation at the C -position derived
In summary, we have demonstrated that the synthesis
of lanthionines using N-trityl iodoalanine as an alanyl
b-cation equivalent is problematic. The major product
of this synthetic strategy is the regioisomeric nor-lan-
thionine 12, formed from the regioisomeric a-iodo-b-
from the serine precursor; or regioisomer formation.
Dugave and M e´ nez had previously demonstrated, via
desulfurisation, derivatisation and chiral HPLC mea-
surements of the resulting alanines, that racemisation of
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) Me SiCl, Et N, DCM, Trt–Cl, then MeOH (88%); (ii) Cs CO , allyl bromide (87%); (iii)
3
3
2
3
t
MsCl, Et N (91%); (iv) NaI, acetone (87%); (v) Fmoc-CysO Bu, Cs CO (90%); (vi) TFA/CH Cl ; (vii) Alloc–Cl, NaHCO ,
3
2
3
2
2
3
dioxane/H O (87%); (viii) TFA/CH Cl (95%).
2
2
2
Scheme 2.