3
-(Phenylamino)propane-1,2-diol Clearance in Mice
Chem. Res. Toxicol., Vol. 12, No. 12, 1999 1129
a single total dose of PAP (250 mg/kg, average animal weight
hexanes/EtOAc), yielding 0.092 g of pure ester 1a as a colorless
1
in each group of 22-24 g). Specifically, each animal received a
oil (60% yield): IR (CDCl
3
) 3275, 3056, 2925, 1681, 1645; H
1
4
total of 6 µCi of [U- C]PAP, and the dose was completed with
the unlabeled PAP. Urine and feces were collected over a 24 h
period, and the animals were euthanized. Organs (lung, liver,
kidney, heart, muscle, and spleen) were collected in cold PBS
and stored at -80 °C until the radioactivity was measured. In
a second set of experiments, animals were induced with â-naph-
thoflavone during the acclimatization period before administra-
tion of PAP (total dose of 80 mg/kg in olive oil distributed in
three intraperitoneal injections).
NMR δ 7.18 (t, 2 H, J ) 7.4 Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 6.74 (t, 1 H, J ) 7.2
Hz, H-4′), 6.66 (d, 2 H, J ) 7.8 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 4.42 (m, 1 H,
H-2), 3.77 (s, 3 H, CH
3
), 3.54 (dd, 1 H, J
) 13.2 Hz, J
C NMR δ 174.0 (CO), 147.5 (C-1′), 129.2 (C-3′, C-5′), 118.2 (C-
1
) 13.2 Hz, J
2
2
) 3.8
Hz, CHH-N), 3.41 (dd, 1 H, J
1
) 5.6 Hz, CHH-N);
1
3
4′), 113.5 (C-2′, C-6′), 69.5 (C-2), 52.7 (CH
m/z 195 (M ), 136, 118, 106 (base peak). Elemental analysis for
3
), 47.0 (C-3); EI-MS
+
10 3
C H13NO : C, 61.53; H, 6.71; N, 7.17. Found: C, 61.43; H, 6.87;
N, 7.16.
Syn th esis of Su bstr a tes a n d P oten tia l Meta bolites. PAP
was synthesized as described previously (30). Unless stated
otherwise, organic solutions obtained from the treatment of
A solution of 1a (0.055 g, 0.28 mmol) in 1:1 methanol/0.1 N
NaOH was stirred for 30 min at 25 °C. When the reaction was
completed (TLC monitoring), the crude reaction mixture was
acidified to pH 6 and passed through a reverse-phase (C-18)
cartridge. Elution with methanol afforded acid 1 as a solid in
near quantitative yield (32): H NMR δ 7.10 (t, 2 H, J ) 7.8
Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 6.69 (d, 2 H, J ) 8 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 6.62 (t, 1 H,
crude reaction mixtures were dried over MgSO
of metabolites by flash chromatography was performed using
5-70 µm silica gel (SDS). Reactions were monitored by either
4
. Purification
1
3
GC, HPLC, or TLC. GC analyses were performed on a Hewlett-
Packard 5890 Series II gas chromatograph, provided with a FID
detector and a 15 m HP-5 capillary column. HPLC analyses were
performed on a Hewlett-Packard 1100 system provided with a
DAD detector and an HP ODS Hypersil column (5 µm, 125 mm
J ) 7.4 Hz, H-4′), 4.14 (m, 1 H, H-2), 3.45 (dd, 1 H, J
Hz, J ) 3.4 Hz, CHH-N), 3.21 (dd, 1 H, J ) 12.6 Hz, J
Hz, CHH-N); C NMR δ 164.4 (CO), 150.9 (C-1′), 130.8 (C-3′,
C-5′), 119.2 (C-4′), 115.3 (C-2′, C-6′), 98.1 (C-2), 73.1 (C-3).
1
) 12.6
) 7.2
2
1
2
1
3
×
4 mm), using mixtures of HPLC grade acetonitrile and 10
(3) 2-Hyd r oxy-3-(p h en yla m in o)p r op yl Aceta te (2). A
mixture of PAP (0.101 g, 0.6 mmol), acetic acid (38 µL, 0.66
mmol), N,N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (0.15 g, 0.7 mmol), and
4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (0.008 g, 0.06 mmol) in dichlo-
romethane (4 mL) was allowed to react for 3 h at 25 °C. Once
the reaction was completed (TLC monitoring), the solvent was
eliminated under vacuum and the residue resuspended in
hexane to induce precipitation of the urea derivative. Final
purification of the crude reaction mixture by preparative TLC
(4:1 hexanes/EtOAc) afforded pure acetate 2 as an oil (0.09 g,
mM TEAA (pH 6.8) buffer as eluents. Thin-layer chromatogra-
phy (TLC) analyses and purifications were performed on Merck
Kielsegel 60 F254 plates (aluminum sheets, 0.2 mm thick, and
glass plates, 0.5 mm thick) using mixtures of hexanes and
EtOAc as eluents, unless otherwise stated, and were developed
by UV irradiation at 254 nm. Radioactivity was determined with
an LKB 1217 Rackbeta scintillation counter following the
addition of 10 mL of OptiPhase “HiSafe” cocktail. The IR spectra
were recorded with a MB model 120 Bomen apparatus, and
-
1
1
13
1
absorptions are given in cm . The H (300 MHz) and C (75
MHz) NMR spectra were recorded with a Varian Unity 300
spectrometer. Spectra were recorded in neutralized CDCl
unless stated otherwise. Chemical shifts are given in parts per
million relative to tetramethylsilane for H and deuteriochlo-
roform for C as internal standards. The EI-MS spectra (70 eV)
were obtained using a Fisons model MD 800 mass spectrometer
coupled to a Fisons GC 8000 apparatus equipped with a 25 m
HP-5 capillary column. Elemental microanalyses were carried
out at the Servei de Microan a` lisi of the IIQAB using a 1108
Carlo Erba analyzer.
72% yield) IR (CDCl ) 3402, 3053, 2927, 1737; H NMR δ 7.19
3
(t, 2 H, J ) 7.5 Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 6.74 (t, 1 H, J ) 7.3 Hz, H-4′),
3
6.66 (d, 2 H, J ) 7.5 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 4.27-4.06 (ca, 3 H, H-1,
H-2), 3.32 (dd, 1 H, J 1 ) 13 Hz, J 2 ) 4.2 Hz, CHH-N), 3.17 (dd,
1
13
1 H, J 1 ) 13 Hz, J 2 ) 7.2 Hz, CHH-N, 2.12 (s, 3 H, CH );
3
C
1
3
NMR δ 172.0 (CO), 147.8 (C-1′), 129.3 (C-3′, C-5′), 118.2 (C-4′),
113.3 (C-2′, C-6′), 68.5 (C-2), 66.6 (C-1), 46.6 (C-3), 20.8 (CH );
3
+
EI-MS m/z 209 (M
), 106 (base peak), 43.
(
4) (N-Acetyl-N-p h en yla m in o)p r op a n e-1,2-d iol (3). This
compound was prepared by protection of PAP as dioxolane
followed by acylation at the secondary amine and finally release
of the protecting moiety. Briefly, a mixture of PAP (1.62 g, 9.7
mmol), 2,2-dimethoxypropane (31 mL), and anhydrous p-tolu-
enesulfonic acid (0.20 g, 0.97 mmol) was stirred for 3 h at 25 °C
(GC monitoring). The residue obtained after elimination of
solvent was redissolved in water (pH 9-10), extracted with
dichloromethane, and dried. Purification of the new residue by
column chromatography on silica gel (4:1 hexanes/EtOAc)
afforded a pale yellow oil identified as the corresponding
dioxolane (1.02 g, 50% yield): 1H NMR δ 7.17 (t, 2 H, J ) 7.9
Hz, H-3′, H-5′), 6.71 (t, 1 H, J ) 7.3 Hz, H-4′), 6.61 (d, 2 H, J )
7.8 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 4.32 (m, 1 H, H-2), 4.05 (dd, 1 H, J 1 ) 8.2
1
4
(
1) Syn th esis of [U- C]P AP . This compound was prepared
following the general procedure described previously (31). All
evaporations of solvents and excess volatile reagents were
performed under a nitrogen stream in a well-ventilated hood
provided with the adequate filter systems. Briefly, a solution of
1
4
[U- C]aniline hydrochloride (160 µCi in methanol) was evapo-
rated to dryness, and the residue was redissolved in tert-butyl
methyl ether (1 mL). This solution was washed with 0.1 N
NaOH (200 µL). The organic phase was separated and evapo-
1
4
rated, yielding free [U- C]aniline. Aniline (10.5 mg, 0.11 mmol),
glycidol (9.0 mg, 0.12 mmol), and methanol (200 µL) were added
to this residue, and the mixture was stirred overnight at 50 °C.
The temperature was then increased to 60 °C and the stirring
prolonged for 4 h. The reaction course was followed by TLC.
The residue obtained from the evaporation of solvents was
redissolved in chloroform and purified by preparative TLC (6:1
chloroform/methanol with 0.5% triethylamine), yielding a frac-
Hz, J 2 ) 6.4 Hz, CHH-O), 3.96 (s, 1 H, NH), 3.72 (dd, 1 H, J 1
8.2 Hz, J 2 ) 6.2 Hz, CHH-O), 3.26 (dd, 1 H, J 1 ) 12.6 Hz, J 2
)
)
4.4 Hz, CHH-N), 3.15 (dd, 1 H, J ) 12.6 Hz, J ) 6.4 Hz, CHH-
1
2
1
3
N), 1.44 (s, 3 H, CH ), 1.36 (s, 3 H, CH ); C NMR δ 147.9 (C-
3
3
1′), 129.1 (C-3′, C-5′), 117.6 (C-4′), 112.8 (C-2′, C-6′), 109.3
(H CCCH ), 74.4 (C-2), 67.1 (C-1), 46.5 (C-3), 26.8 (CH ), 25.2
3
3
3
1
4
+
tion of pure [U- C]PAP (R
activity of 1.5 mCi/mmol), which was stored at -20 °C until it
was used.
f
) 0.35, 10.5 mg, 57% yield, specific
3
(CH ); EI-MS m/z 207 (M ), 192, 106 (base peak).
A solution of this dioxolane (0.21 g, 1.0 mmol) in 1,1,2-
trichloroethylene (2 mL) was mixed with acetic anhydride (92
µL, 0.97 mmol) and pyridine (80 µL, 0.99 mmol), and the mixture
was stirred for 30 min at 45 °C (GC monitoring). The elimination
of solvent and excess reagents under vacuum led to a residue
which was identified as the expected N-acetyl derivative as a
solid (0.20 g, 83% yield): mp 62-64 °C; IR (KBr) 3022, 2987,
(
2) 2-Hyd r oxy-3-(p h en yla m in o)p r op a n oic Acid (1). This
compound was prepared by epoxidation of methyl acrylate,
followed by reaction with aniline and finally ester hydrolysis.
Briefly, a solution of methyl 2,3-epoxypropionate, prepared by
reaction of methyl acrylate with excess dimethyldioxirane (0.08
g, 0.8 mmol) in MeOH (2 mL), was treated with aniline (0.15 g,
1
2879, 1666; H NMR δ 7.4 (ca, 3 H, H-3′, H-4′, H-5′), 7.26 (d, 2
1
(
.6 mmol), and the mixture was heated under reflux for 2 h
TLC monitoring). The elimination of solvent under vacuum
gave a residue which was purified by preparative TLC (3:1
H, J ) 8.2 Hz, H-2′, H-6′), 4.37 (m, 1 H, H-2), 4.00 (ca, 2 H,
CHH-O, CHH-N), 3.71 (ca, 2 H, CHH-O, CHH-N), 1.86 (s, 3 H,
1
3
3 3
CH ), 1.31 (s, 3 H, CH ); C NMR δ 170.6 (CO), 143.4 (C-1′),