536
M. Jafarpour, A. Rezaeifard, and T. Golshani
Vol 46
Scheme 1
ically important bis- and trisindolylmethanes in high
yields through the electrophilic substitution reaction of
indoles with carbonyl compounds using ZrO(DS)2 as
new LASC. This protocol will contribute to reducing
the use of harmful organic solvents.
EXPERIMENTAL
General. ZrOCl2.8H2O, SDS, carbonyl compounds, and
indoles were purchased from Merck or Fluka Chemical Com-
panies. Progress of the reactions was monitored by TLC using
silica-gel SIL G/UV 254 plates. NMR spectra were recorded
on a Brucker Avance DPX 300 MHz and 500 MHz instru-
ments. Mass spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu GC-MS-QP
5050A.
indoles with a variety of aldehydes and ketones in H2O
and EtOH, both of which are green solvents, affording
excellent yields of bis- and tris(indolyl)methanes under
mild condition (Scheme 1).
Preparation of ZrO(DS)2 from ZrOCl2.8H2O and sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS). A solution of ZrOCl2.8H2O (5 mmol,
1.61 g in 50 mL of water) was added to a solution of sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (10 mmol, 2.88 g in 50 mL of distilled
water) while stirring at room temperature. A white precipitate
was appeared immediately and the mixture was stirred for
another 30 min. The white solid was collected by filtration and
washed with water (2 ꢁ 100 mL). The isolated solid was dried
under reduced pressure and ZrO(DS)2 was obtained as a white
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Optimized reaction conditions were investigated using
a reaction of benzaldehyde and indole (1:2.2), with
respect to temperature, time, and the molar ratio of
ZrO(DS)2 to the substrate in water. We found that
10 mol % of ZrO(DS)2 was sufficient to obtain the desired
bisindolylmethane in 96% yield within 20 min at 60ꢀC.
Based on the optimized reaction conditions, the pres-
ent protocol was applied to a variety of carbonyl com-
pounds (Table 1). As shown in Table 1 aryl aldehydes
with both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing
characteristics afforded bis(indolyl)methane in excellent
yields. Not only aryl aldehydes but also aliphatic alde-
hydes provided the desired bis(indolyl)methane (Table 1,
entry 9).
1
powder in 90% yield (2.87 g). M.p: 125ꢀC; H NMR (DMSO,
500 MHz): d 0.82 (t, 6H, J ¼ 6.8 Hz), 1.1–1.35 (m, 36H),
1.45 (m, 4H), 3.69 (t, 4H, J ¼ 6.6 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR
(DMSO, 125.77 MHz): 13.90, 22.14, 25.58, 28.78, 28.90,
29.04, 29.11, 29.13, 31.37, 32.63, 60.83, 65.99 ppm.
General procedure for condensation of indoles with car-
bonyl compounds catalyzed by ZrO(DS)2. Indole (2.2 mmol)
and carbonyl compound (1 mmol) was added to a suspension
of ZrO(DS)2 (10 mol %, 0.0638 g in 2 mL of water or EtOH)
(see Table 1). The reaction mixture was stirred at 60ꢀC for
appropriate time which was monitored by TLC (Table 1).
After completion of the reaction, EtOAc (5 mL) was added to
the reaction mixture; organic phase was separated and dried
over CaCl2 followed by filtration and evaporation of the sol-
vent. The desired product was secured in high purity (Table
1). Further purification was performed by plate chromatogra-
phy eluted with n-hexan/EtOAc (3/1). Structural assignments
of the products are based on their 1H NMR, 13C NMR, MS
spectra and elemental analysis.
We have found that the reaction of both activated and
deactivated aromatic aldehydes with 2-methyl indole is
faster than indole (Table 1, entries 10,11).
When 3-formylindole was used as a carbonyl com-
pound, the corresponding trisindolylmethanes are
formed. The reaction proceeded at room temperature in
EtOH and the time required for the conversion was short
(Table 1, entreis 12,13).
Selected spectral data. Table 1, entry 2: Solid; mp: 97–
1
98ꢀC; H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 300 MHz): d 2.37 (s, 3H), 5.83
(s, 1H), 6.70(d, 2H, J ¼ 2.45 Hz), 7.02(t, 2H, J ¼ 8.2 Hz),
7.12(d, 2H, J ¼ 8.2 Hz), 7.21–7.3(m, 6H), 7.45(d, 2H, J ¼ 8.2
Hz), 7.9(br, s, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 62.9 MHz):
21, 40.25, 110.9, 112, 119.5, 120.2, 121.6, 122.6, 129.5, 131.5,
134.3, 136.8 ppm; MS (70 ev), m/e: 336 [Mþ]. Anal. Calcd
for (C24H20N2): C, 85.68; H, 5.99; N, 8.33. Found: C, 85.70;
H, 5.96; N, 8.35.
Table 1, entry 12: Solid; mp: 161ꢀC(dec.); 1H NMR
(DMSO, 300 MHz): d 6.08 (s, 1H), 6.89 (s, 3H), 6.87(t, 3H, J
¼ 7.45 Hz), 7.02 (t, 3H, J ¼ 7.25 Hz), 7.44 (d, 3H, J ¼ 7.83
Hz), 7.56 (d, 3H, J ¼ 7.83 Hz), 10.72 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR
(DMSO, 62.9 MHz): 30.8 ,111.4, 117.5, 118, 119,120.6, 124,
126.8, 136.5 ppm; MS (70 eV), m/e: 361 [Mþ]. Anal. Calcd.
for (C25H19N3): C, 83.08; H, 5.30; N, 11.63. Found: C, 83.10;
H, 5.32; N, 11.65.
The reaction of acetophenone with indole is slower
than with aldehydes, and unreacted ketone and indole
remains (Table 1, entry 14).
To show the merit of ZrO(DS)2 in comparison with
other catalysts used for the similar reactions in
green solvents, we have tabulated some of the results in
Table 2.
CONCLUSION
We have developed a highly convenient, efficient,
and green catalytic system for the preparation of biolog-
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet