L.C. Rocha et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 84 (2012) 160–165
165
following anti-Prelog’s rule. In this case the support matrix used
Acknowledgements
did not impair enzyme activity, but altered the chiral selectivity of
the reduction reaction.
The authors wish to thank Prof. R.G.S. Berlinck (Instituto de
Química de São Carlos – USP) for providing the marine fungal strains
and wish to thank Prof. Timothy John Brockson (Universidade Fed-
eral de São Carlos – UFSCar) for optical rotation measurements
in a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter (Waltham, MA, USA). We also
acknowledge to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientí-
fico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Funda c¸ ão de Amparo à Pesquisa do
Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for financial support. We also thanks
to Coordena c¸ ão de Aperfei c¸ oamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
(CAPES) for the scholarship grant to LCR.
In addition, when the P. citrinum was immobilized on the silica
xerogel matrix ketone 2 was not reduced. This result, as expected,
confirmed that the silica xerogel matrix formed a strong barrier on
the surface of the mycelium hindering the access of substrate to
one or more enzymes involved in the reduction (entry 10, Table 1
and Fig. 1E–F).
Again, the whole cells of P. citrinum immobilized on chitosan
catalyzed the reduction of ketone 2 to alcohol 4a,b in excellent
yield (98% after purification by CC), but without selectivity (entry
1
1, Table 1). However, when cells of P. citrinum were immobilized
on chitosan the conversion to alcohol (RS)-3a,b was dramatically
increased (entry 11, Table 1).
References
[
1] J. Kumirska, M. Czerwicka, Z. Kaczy n´ ski, A. Bychowska, K. Brzozowski, J.
Thöming, P. Stepnowski, Mar. Drugs 8 (2010) 1567–1636.
In these studies, we have observed that chitosan has clear
advantages when used as a matrix for the immobilization of fil-
amentous fungi. Probably, the reactive hydroxyl and amino groups
present in the repeating units of the polymer chains interact
with the mycelium of the fungus and promote strong interac-
tion matrix/mycelia. In addition, as chitosan is an organic polymer
matrix, it probably facilitates the interaction of the substrate with
the immobilized hyphae, favoring the reactions to go to completion.
The use of whole cells of A. sclerotiorum, both free and immobi-
lized on silica gel, catalyzed the reduction of ketone 2 to (R)-alcohol
[
2] R. Dalla-Vecchia, M.G. Nascimento, V. Soldi, Quim. Nova 27 (2004) 623–630.
[3] K.A. Lusta, I.K. Chung, I.W. Sul, H.S. Park, D.I. Shin, Process Biochem. 35 (2000)
177–1182.
1
[
[
4] B.M. Brena, F.B. Viera, Method Biotechnol. 22 (2006) 15–29.
5] I. Chibata, T. Tosa, Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 22 (1978) 1–27.
[6] D. Su, P. Li, X. Wang, F. Stagnitti, X. Xiong, Environ. Eng. Sci. 25 (2008)
1181–1188.
[
7] I.R.W.Z. Oliveira, O. Fatibello-Filho, S.C. Fernandes, I.C. Vieira, Quim. Nova 32
2009) 1195–1201.
8] C. Kuek, Int. Ind. Biotechnol. 56 (1986) 4–5.
(
[
[9] D.J. Leak, R.A. Sheldon, J.M. Woodley, P. Adlercreutz, Biocatal. Biotransform. 27
2009) 1–26.
(
4
a in accordance to Prelog’s rule, with good optical purity (entries
[
10] K.K. Prasad, S.V. Mohan, Y.V. Bhaskar, S.V. Ramanaiah, V.L. Babu, B.R. Pati, P.N.
Sarma, J. Clin. Microbiol. 43 (2005) 301–307.
1
2 and 13, Table 1). Previously, the fungus A. sclerotiorum was
immobilized on silica xerogel and it did not catalyzed the reduc-
tion of ketone 2 (entry 14, Table 1). The fungus A. sclerotiorum was
not immobilized in chitosan.
[11] L.G. Covizzi, E.C. Giese, E. Gomes, R.F.H. Dekker, R. Silva, Semina: Ciências Exatas
e Tecnológicas, Londrina 28 (2007) 143–160.
[12] S. Sanchez, A.L. Demain, Org. Process Res. Dev. 15 (2011) 224–230.
13] R.A.A. Muzzarelli, Chitin, Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, 1977.
[
Taken together, these results show that the use of whole immo-
bilized hyphae for the reduction of 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-ethanone
[14] N.A.R. Gow, W. Goodayg, Protoplasma 115 (1983) 52–58.
[
15] V. Gohel, A. Singh, M. Vimal, D. Ashwini, H.S. Chhatpar, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5
2006) 54–72.
(
(
1) and 2-chloro-1-phenylethanone (2) depends on both, the xeno-
[
16] M. Pagnoncelli, G. Binder, N.K. Araújo, N.M.P. Silva, C.F. Assis, S. Rodrigues, G.R.
Macedo, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 53 (2010) 1461–1468.
biotic substrate and the type of support matrix used.
[
[
[
17] A. Trincone, Mar. Drugs 9 (2011) 478–499.
18] F. Bissett, D. Sternberg, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35 (1978) 750–755.
19] J.S. Yadav, B.V.S. Reddy, C. Sreelakshmi, A.B. Rao, Synthesis 11 (2009)
4
. Conclusion
1881–1885.
[
20] L.C. Rocha, H.V. Ferreira, E.F. Pimenta, R.G.S. Berlinck, M.H.R. Seleghim, D.C.D.
Javaroti, L.D. Sette, R.C. Bonugli, A.L.M. Porto, Biotechnol. Lett. 31 (2009)
In this study, we reported the immobilization of whole mycelia
of the P. citrinum CBMAI 1186 and A. sclerotiorum CBMAI 849
for the biocatalytic reduction of ketones. The selected strains of
marine-derived fungi showed a potential for optically asymmetric
reduction of the carbonyl group depending on the support matrix.
Silica gel proved to be an interesting support matrix to immobilize
cells of filamentous fungi. The silica xerogel matrix was of inter-
est because it adhered strongly to the mycelium of the filamentous
fungi. However, exactly because of the strong adhesion, the reac-
tions could not take place, the barrier of the support preventing
the access of substrate to enzyme. The use of chitosan as a support
for the immobilization of filamentous fungi is certainly very advan-
tageous. The reduction reactions of ketones 1 and 2 tested in this
study with hyphae of P. citrinum immobilized on chitosan were
enhanced as compared to the reactions carried out with the free
cells. The SEM micrographs showed a strong interaction between
chitosan and the mycelium of P. citrinum.
1
559–1563.
[21] D.L. Pavia, G.M. Lampman, G.S. Kriz, R.G. Engel, Introduction to Organic
Laboratory Techniques, 3rd ed., Sunders College Publishing, Orlando,
1
999.
[
22] A.M. De Vita-Marques, S.P. Lira, R.G.S. Berlinck, M.H.R. Seleghim, S.R.P. Sponchi-
ado, S.M. Tauk-Tornisielo, M. Barata, C. Pessoa, M.O. De Moraes, B. Coelho,
G.G.F. Nascimento, A.O. De Souza, F.C.S. Galetti, C.L. Silva, M. Silva, E.F.
Pimenta, O. Thiemann, M.R.Z. Passarini, L.D. Sette, Quim. Nova 31 (2008)
1099–1103.
[
[
[
23] R.C.B. Santos, L.R. Durrant, M. Silva, L.D. Sette, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 46
(2010) 32–37.
24] J.A.M. Delezuk, M.B. Cardoso, A. Domard, S.P. Campana-Filho, Polym. Int. 60
(
2011) 903–909.
25] M. Prokopowicz, A. Przyjazny, J. Microencapsul. 24 (2007) 694–713.
[26] A.M. Mouad, M.P. Martins, H.M. Debonsi, A.L.L. Oliveira, R. Felicio, N.S. Yokoya,
M.T. Fujii, C.B.A. Menezes, F.F. Garboggini, A.L.M. Porto, Helv. Chim. Acta 94
(
2011) 1506–1514.
[
27] M.A. Quezada, J.D. Carballeira, J.V. Sinisterra, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009)
2018–2025.