Metal-Ligand Effects on Gated Electron Transfer
Beyond these convenient properties for manipulating gated
ET, a number of studies suggest that the alkaline conformer
of Cytc may play a role in its function in mitochondrial
1
3
electron transport.
In mitochondrial cytochromes c, the midpoint pH for
formation of the alkaline state of Cytc ranges from 8.5 to
1
4
1
1. To make this conformer accessible near physiological
pH, we have exploited the well-understood thermodynamics
of this protein. Cytc is known to have five cooperative
substructures, as outlined in Figure 1, that unfold sequen-
1
5
tially. In other words the thermodynamics of Cytc are
hierarchical. The two least stable substructures (shown in
gray and red in Figure 1) unfold in the alkaline conformer.1
For either of the alkaline state ligands, Lys 73 or Lys 79, to
displace Met 80, the red substructure must be disrupted (see
Figure 1). Since the gray substructure is less stable than the
red substructure and unfolding of the substructures of Cytc
is sequential, mutations which destabilize either of these
substructures should destabilize the native state relative to
the alkaline state of Cytc. In previous work on yeast iso-1-
Cytc, we have shown that stabilizing mutations at position
Figure 1. Yeast iso-1-cytochrome c in the oxidized state is shown with
the substructure classifications of horse cytochrome c according to ref 15.
The substructures are color-coded gray (N-yellow substructure, residues
6-18
4
0-57), red (residues 71-85), yellow (residues 37-39, 58-61, in back of
structure), green (60’s helix and 20’s-30’s loop), and blue (N- and
C-terminal helices) in order of increasing stability. The heme (blue, iron in
red) and its ligands (magenta), His 18 and Met 80, are shown as stick
models. The Lys 73 and Lys 79 heme ligands in the alkaline conformer
and Asn 52, which is mutated to Gly in the A79G52 variant, are shown as
space-filling models (R-carbon and side-chain atoms) in the color of the
substructure in which they are contained. Lys 79 is mutated to Ala in both
the A79G52 and A79H73 variants so that there is only one possible heme
ligand in the alkaline conformer, Lys 73 and His 73, respectively. The figure
was prepared with DS ViewerPro software and the Protein Data Bank file,
5
2 in the gray substructure (see Figure 1) stabilize the
1
2
18d
2
YCC.
alkaline conformer relative to the native state. Previous
studies on the effects of mutations at position 52 on the global
stability of iso-1-Cytc show that the stability of the variant
proteins depends on the size of the amino acid at this
ET can be modulated by both the ligands involved and the
8
nature of the conformational change. An early example of
conformationally gated protein ET involving a metal-ligand
exchange reaction was observed for the alkaline conformer
of cytochrome c (Cytc).9 More recently, metal-ligand
exchange reactions have been implicated in gated ET for
plastocyanin.5
19
position. In particular, an Asn 52 f Gly mutation
significantly decreased the global stability of iso-1-Cytc. On
this basis, we created an A79G52 (Lys 79 f Ala and Asn
5
2 f Gly mutations) variant of iso-1-Cytc. Our thermody-
namic and kinetic analyses have verified that A79G52 iso-
-Cytc makes the alkaline conformer accessible near neutral
c
Conformational gates that operate near neutral pH are
desirable both for engineered function and as components
in molecular electronics devices. The ability to tune the rate
of an ET gate over narrow ranges, as well as over orders of
magnitude, is also important. Cytc provides a particularly
useful scaffold for tuning these properties for a conforma-
tionally gated ET reaction. In the alkaline conformer, lysine
ligation leads to an ∼0.5 V decrease in the affinity of yeast
iso-1-cytochrome c (iso-1-Cytc) for an electron,10 whereas
histidine ligation is expected to cause a decrease of ∼0.25
1
20
pH (midpoint pH ∼7.4). The Lys 79 f Ala mutation
simplifies gating kinetics by making Lys 73 the only heme
ligand in the alkaline conformer of this variant. As discussed
below, this latter mutation might also be expected to
modestly perturb the dynamics of the conformational change
from the native to the alkaline state. However, since the
kinetics of formation of the lysine 73 and 79 alkaline
conformers cannot be determined individually when both are
1
1
V, relative to the native heme-Met 80 ligation. Thus,
conformationally gated ET is expected for both alkaline
states. For iso-1-Cytc, the heme ligands are known to be
(12) Berghuis, A. M.; Brayer, G. D. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 223, 959-976.
(
13) (a) D o¨ pner, S.; Hildebrant, P.; Rosell, F. I.; Mauk, A. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 11246-11255. (b) D o¨ pner, S.; Hildebrant, P.; Rosell,
F. I.; Mauk, A. G.; von Walter, M.; Buse, G.; Soulimane, T. Eur. J.
Biochem. 1999, 261, 379-391.
10a
lysines 73 and 79 in the alkaline conformer (see Figure 1),
allowing heme ligation in this state to be readily manipulated.
(14) Moore, G. R.; Pettigrew, G. W. Cytochrome c: EVolutionary,
Structural and Physicochemical Aspects; Springer-Verlag: New York,
1
990; pp 184-196.
(
7) (a) Rorabacher, D. B. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 651-697. (b) Meagher,
N. E.; Juntunen, K. L.; Salhi, C. A.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher,
D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10411-10420. (c) Wijetunge, P.;
Kulatilleke, C. P.; Dressel, L. T.; Heeg, M. J.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.;
Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 2897-2905.
(15) (a) Bai, Y.; Sosnick, T. R.; Mayne, L.; Englander, S. W. Science 1995,
269, 192-197. (b) Krishna, M. M. G.; Lin, Y.; Rumbley, J. N.;
Englander, S. W. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 29-36.
(16) Hoang, L.; Maity, H.; Krishna, M. M. G.; Lin, Y.; Englander, S. W.
J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 37-43.
(
(
8) Baddam, S.; Bowler, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9702-9703.
9) (a) Greenwood, C.; Palmer, G. J. Biol. Chem. 1965, 240, 3660-3663.
(17) Assfalg, M.; Bertini, I.; Dolfi, A.; Turano, P.; Mauk, A. G.; Rosell,
F. I.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2913-2922.
(18) (a) Godbole, S.; Dong, A.; Garbin, K.; Bowler, B. E. Biochemistry
1997, 36, 119-126. (b) Godbole, S.; Bowler, B. E. Biochemistry 1999,
38, 487-495. (c) Nelson, C. J.; Bowler, B. E. Biochemistry 2000, 39,
13584-13594. (d) Kristinsson, R.; Bowler, B. E. Biochemistry 2005,
44, 2349-2359.
(
1
b) Wilson, M. T.; Greenwood, C. Eur. J. Biochem. 1971, 22, 11-
8. (c) Hodges, H. L.; Holwerda, R. A.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1974, 96, 3132-3137.
10) (a) Rosell, F. I.; Ferrer, J. C.; Mauk, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
(
(
1
20, 11234-11245. (b) Barker, P. D.; Mauk, A. G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 3619-3624.
(19) Hickey, D. R.; Berghuis, A. M.; Lafond, G.; Jaeger, J. A.; Cardillo,
T. S.; McLendon, D.; Das, G.; Sherman, F.; Brayer, G. D.; McLendon,
G. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 11686-11694.
11) (a) Raphael, A. L.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1038-
1
040. (b) Feinberg, B. A.; Liu, X.; Ryan, M. D.; Schejter, A.; Zhang,
C.; Margoliash, E. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 13091-13101.
(20) Baddam, S.; Bowler, B. E. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 4611-4619.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 16, 2006 6339