S. Ruan et al.
Inorganic Chemistry Communications 132 (2021) 108847
Scheme 1. Synthesis of probe P1.
were recorded on a Bruker AV 400 spectrometer in DMSO‑d6 and tet-
ramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. High-resolution mass spectra
(HRMS) were tested by an America Agilent 5975c mass spectrometer.
UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded by a Shimadzu UV-2450 at the
room temperature. Fluorescence spectra were carried out on fluores-
cence spectrophotometer (LS 55, Perkin Elmer).
1H) ;ESI-MS (m/z): [Mꢀ Cl]+ : calcd. for C20H16ClNO5-Cl-, 350.1023;
found, 350.1049.
2.2.3. Synthesis of compound 4
Compound 3 (50 mg, 0.14 mmol) and 1,3-propanedithiol (45.4 mg,
0.42 mmol) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL), and a catalytic amount of
BF3⋅Et2O (0.04 mL, 0.30 mmol) was added, and the mixture was reacted
at room temperature for 15 h under N2 atmosphere. The reacted mixture
was evaporated to remove off solvent, and the residue was purified by
recrystallization with CH3OH/Et2O (v/v = 2:1) to obtain compound 4 as
a red solid, 37.5 mg, yield: 57.3%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6) δ: 9.31
(s, 1H), 8.37 (s, 1H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H),
6.15 (s, 2H), 4.60 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.30 (s, 2H), 3.10 (t, J
= 6.2 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (dt, J = 14.1, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 1.24 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 2H) ;
ESI-MS (m/z): [Mꢀ Cl]+ calcd. for C20H16ClNO5-Cl-, 440.0985; found,
440.1019.
2.2. Synthesis of probe P1
As shown in Scheme 1, berberine was selectively demethylated
under vacuum and heating conditions, and then acidized and formylated
to get compound 3. The probe P1 was obtained by condensation of
compound 3 with 1,3-propanedithiol. The chemical structure of the
above compounds and probe P1 was characterized by 1H NMR and HR-
MS (Fig. S1-S7).
2.2.1. Synthesis of compound 2
Berberine chloride (10.0 g, 26.9 mmol) was heated at 180–190 ◦C for
30–60 min under vacuum to afford dark wine solid, which was washed
with MeOH (80 mL) and filtered to afford the red compound. And this
crude product was added C2H5OH (100 mL) and HCl (3.0 M, 70 mL) to
stir for 6 h to obtain yellow material, which was washed with CH3OH/
Et2O (v/v = 3:1) 3 times (3 × 60 mL) to afford compound 2 as a yellow
solid, 8.87 g, yield: 92.4%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6) δ: 11.31 (s,
1H), 9.97 (s, 1H), 8.88 (s, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (s, 1H),
7.75 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 6.21 (s, 2H), 4.96 (t, J = 6.3 Hz,
2H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 3.25 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H);13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6)
δ: 149.58, 147.61, 145.70, 145.30, 143.75, 136.52, 132.39, 130.33,
125.43, 120.56, 119.80, 118.03, 117.58, 108.32, 105.29, 101.94, 56.99,
54.89, 26.48;ESI-MS (m/z): [Mꢀ Cl]+ : calcd. for C19H16ClNO4-Cl─,
322.1074; found, 322.1074.
2.3. Spectroscopic measurements of probe P1
The absorption and fluorescence detection experiments were done in
CH3OH/PBS (8:2, v/v, pH = 7.4, 10 mM) solution at the room temper-
ature, and the excitation wavelength is 365 nm. The probe P1 stock
solution (2.5 × 10-4 M) was prepared in CH3OH. The test solution was
prepared by adding 100 μL stock solution to 10 mL CH3OH/PBS buffer
(8:2, v/v, pH = 7.4, 10 mM). The solutions of various analytes (5.0 × 10-
4
M) (including Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Co2+, Al3+, Ni2+, Sn2+, Ag2+
,
Zn2+, Cu2+, I─, NO3─, AcO─, H2PO42─, S2─) were prepared in deionized
water.
2.4. Visualization of Hg2+ in solution by test paper
The filter paper was immersed into the CH3OH solution of probe P1
(2.5 × 10-4 M) and dried in air for 30 min. The treated test papers were
2.2.2. Synthesis of compound 3
Compound 3 was obtained according to the reported procedures
[31]. Compound 2 (1.0 g, 3.1 mmol) and hexamine (1.26 g, 9.0 mmol)
were dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid (18 mL), and reacted for 8 h at
85 ◦C. The reaction system was cooled to room temperature, and 3.0 M
HCl (15 mL) was added to react at 85 ◦C for another 2 h. The reacted
mixture was immediately poured into ice water, and extracted with
ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with
distilled water and brine until neutrality, and then evaporated to remove
off the solvent. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography
(CH2Cl2/CH3OH, 10:1, v/v) to give compound 3 as a yellow solid, 0.38 g,
yield: 34.6%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6) δ: 10.19 (s, 1H), 9.28 (s,
1H), 9.08 (s, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.02 (s, 1H), 6.15 (s, 2H),
4.60 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.10 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.24 (s,
immersed in the Hg2+ solution with different concentrations (0
μM-500
μ
M) for 30 min at the room temperature. The fluorescence color changes
of filter paper were observed under day light and 365 nm UV light.
2.5. Quantitation of Hg2+ contamination in real water samples
The real water samples were respectively taken from Zhangjiang
river and Poyang lake, and the real water samples were utilized to
prepare CH3OH solutions (80%, 10 mM). Hg2+ solutions with different
concentrations (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250
μM) were added to the
aforesaid two water samples, and the fluorescence intensity of the water
samples were measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer.
2