Absolute Rate Constants for the tert-Butoxyl Radical
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 32, 1999 7383
solvents were presented by Walling and co-workers.10 They
found an astonishing large variation with the solvent and
concluded that this is due to a solvent dependence of the
fragmentation and not of the hydrogen abstraction. Later, similar
product studies provided many rate constants for addition and
abstraction processes of the tert-butoxyl radical relative to the
â-scission and/or the hydrogen abstraction from cyclohexane
fluorobenzene, cyclopentane, and cyclohexane were passed through an
alumina column, and all solutions were freed from oxygen by at least
3
0 min of purging with argon or helium before use. The arrangements
and procedures for steady-state and time-resolved electron spin
resonance spectroscopy have been described earlier.2-4 In principle,
the signal s(n) of a radical is monitored with repetition times of 5-10
ms. Individual signal vs time profiles (100000-500000) are coherently
accumulated and provide 500 data points in the n channels of a transient
recorder. The s(n) obey s(n) ) c[R(t)], with [R(t)] representing the
radical concentration at time t ) nτ. Here, τ is the channel time width
and c is a sensitivity constant which has not been determined since it
does not influence the extraction of first-order rate constants.
1
c
and other donors.
The strong solvent dependence of the â-scission and the
solvent independence of the hydrogen abstraction reaction were
1
1
confirmed more recently by Ingold et al. in direct time-
resolving studies of product formation and radical decay at 30
The decay parts of the time profiles were analyzed by fits using the
simplex algorithm and either eq 9 if radical A‚ was observed, eq 12 or
°C. These authors also discussed the solvent dependence in detail
9
if the transformation to B‚ was very fast, or eq 10. The fitting
but used the cumyloxyl radical as the model alkoxyl because
tert-butoxyl decayed too slowly for their optical detection
methods. Since our technique allows the study of slower
processes, we applied it here to tert-butoxyl and also present
the temperature dependence of the rate constants. The tert-
butoxyl radical cannot be directly detected in the liquid phase
procedure required the definition of the effective time t at which the
0
photochemical radical generation ends. Actually, the sector edge does
not cut off the light beam instantly but in a sigmoid type fashion2
extending over 10-20 µs. This variation was measured by recording
the signal amplitude of tert-butyl radicals during continuous photolysis
of 4 vol % di-tert-butyl ketone in tetradecane and at room temperature
as a function of the sector angle position φ. In this system, tert-butyl
is generated in about 1-2 µs after ketone excitation, that is, practically
12
by electron spin resonance. Therefore, the kinetic probe is the
methyl radical and its delayed formation from tert-butoxyl after
the scission reaction. 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Fri-
gen 113), benzene, and fluorobenzene were used as fairly inert
solvents, and the tert-butoxyl radicals were generated by
photolysis of 10 vol % di-tert-butyl peroxide. The dissociative
excited state of the peroxide ensures an instant tert-butoxyl
formation. As further medium, neat di-tert-butyl peroxide was
employed. It is known that tert-butoxyl abstracts a hydrogen
atom from the peroxide. The resulting radical ‚CH2CMe2-
OOCMe3 undergoes rapid fragmentation to 2,2-dimethyl oxirane
8
9
instantly, and shows a pure second-order decay. Hence, the square
of the signal amplitude is proportional to the generation rate I. In the
transition region from the on- to the off-period, this rate followed the
relation I(φ) ∝ (1 - tanh[b(φ - φ
but fixed) origin of the angular scale and the parameter b depends on
the slit width. t was then defined by the position of the inflection point
and was determined in kinetic experiments involving the di-tert-
0 0
)])/2, where φ is the (arbitrarily set
0
φ
0
butyl ketone system and simulations of the tert-butyl trace including
the sigmoid generation. Interestingly, the location of the inflection point
resulted also and more simply from fits of pure second-order decays
to eq 15
5
-1
13
and tert-butoxyl with k ) 7 × 10 s at 298 K in benzene.
r
Since this reaction regenerates tert-butoxyl and is fast in the
temperature range employed here, it should not influence the
methyl formation kinetics.
[
B‚]0
[B‚] )
(15)
1
+ (t - t )/τ2
0
In accord with expectation, ESR spectra taken during
continuous photolysis of the peroxide in the four solvents
revealed the presence of methyl in high predominance. Solvent-
derived radicals and the peroxide-derived species ‚CH2CMe2-
OOCMe3 were not observed, but there were very weak signals
of radicals which are formed from products of the major
reactions. Thus, the acetonyl radical ‚CH COCH arises by
which is very similar to eq 14. This is not surprising, since the sigmoid
drop of the radical generation and a delayed formation of the radical
from its precursor must lead to a similar behavior of the concentration
in the on-off transition region. Hence, t
the simpler procedure. In analyses of the various kinetic experiments,
was taken as time origin and defined the channel number for the
0
was mostly determined by
t
0
2
3
on-off transition. This number was held constant as long as the optical
arrangement remained unchanged. More details justifying the procedures
are given as Supporting Information. The upper limiting value of a
hydrogen abstraction from the scission product acetone, the
-hydroxyprop-2-yl radical (CH3)2 C˙ OH by photoreduction of
2
acetone, and the tert-butoxymethyl radical, ‚CH2CO(CH3)3, by
hydrogen abstraction from the cross-termination product of
methyl and tert-butoxyl. The total concentration of the additional
radicals was less than about 8% of methyl and was neglected
in the analysis.
Figure 1 shows kinetic traces of the methyl radical in Frigen
113 containing 10 vol % di-tert-butyl peroxide at two temper-
atures. Overlayed are fits of eq 10 to the data, and the bottom
traces are the fit residuals. After the end of the photolysis the
delayed formation of methyl is clearly visible, in particular in
the enlarged inset. Table 1 gives the lifetimes obtained from
first- or pseudo-first-order rate constant k
A
measurable with the
5
-1
technique is about 10 s . Rate constants given in the figures and tables
are averages from 5 to 15 individual determinations. ESR spectra
obtained during continuous photolysis demonstrate the reactions and
are included in the Supporting Information, and all radicals mentioned
were identified by their known g factors and hyperfine coupling
constants.
â-Scission and Hydrogen Abstractions of the tert-Butoxyl
Radical and Reactions of the Methyl Radical with
Solvents
The â-scission of the tert-butoxyl radical into acetone and
the methyl radical is well-known. In liquids it often occurs in
competition with hydrogen abstraction by tert-butoxyl from
solvent or substrates. Early extensive product studies on the ratio
of rate constants for the â-scission and for the hydrogen
abstraction from cyclohexane and other substrates in various
(
10) (a) Walling, C.; Pawda, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 1593-
1
1597. (b) Walling, C.; Pawda, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 1597-1601.
(
c) Walling, C.; Wagner, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2333-2334. (d)
Walling, C.; Wagner, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 3368-3375. (e)
Walling, C. Pure Appl. Chem. 1967, 15, 69-80, and further references
therein.
(11) Avila, D. V.; Brown, C. E.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 466-470.
(12) (a) Ingold, K. U.; Morton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 3400-
3402. (b) Symons, M. C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 5924, and
references given therein.
(13) Bloodworth, A. J.; Davies, A. G.; Griffin, I. M.; Muggleton, B.;
Roberts, B. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7599-7601.
(
8) (a) Tsentalovich, Y. P.; Fischer, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
994, 729-733. (b) Neville, A. G.; Brown, C. E.; Rayner, D. D. M.;
Lusztyk, J.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1869-1870.
9) Schuh, H.-H.; Fischer, H. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1976, 8, 341-356;
HelV. Chim. Acta 1978, 61, 2130-2164.
1
(