5154
A. J. Proctor et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 5151–5154
Acknowledgements
O
H2O2
ArNHNHCO2Me
N=NCO2Me
Ar
We are very grateful to Mr. Robert Jenkins for experi-
mental assistance, to the EPSRC Mass Spectrometry
Service, University College, Swansea, for the provision
of high resolution mass spectrometric data and to Syn-
genta and the EPSRC for financial support.
8
9
Scheme 4.
them,14 but in the presence of a copper(I) salt. Standard
protocols for the oxidation of hydrazine dicarboxylates
to azodicarboxylates are to use a bromonium ion source
Br , NBS) in the presence of pyridine, or related
methods using chlorine. Alternatives include fuming
1
5
(
References and notes
2
1
6
1
7
nitric acid and, more recently hypervalent iodonium
1. Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1–28; Hughes, D. L. Org.
Prep. Proceed. Int. 1996, 28, 127–164; Hughes, D. L. Org.
React. 1992, 42, 335–365.
. Dembinski, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2763–2772.
. Barrett, A. G. M.; Roberts, R. S.; Schr o¨ der, J. Org. Lett.
000, 2, 2999–3001.
. Mukaiyama, T. Challenges in Synthetic Organic Chemis-
try; Clarendon press: Oxford, 1994.
1
8
reagents. b-Hydroxy hydrazines have been oxidised
using air and copper(II) acetate as catalyst and the
resulting azo compounds further oxidised to a mono-
N-oxide using t-butyl hydroperoxide in the presence of
VO(acac)2. Although the reaction between azodicarb-
oxylates and peroxides appears not to have been re-
ported, hydrogen peroxide has been used to oxidise
the N-aryl carbazates 8 to the N-oxides 9 in the presence
2
3
2
1
9
4
5
. Mitsunobu, O.; Wada, M.; Sano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 679–680.
6. Henry, J. R.; Marcin, L. R.; McIntosh, M. C.; Scola, P.
2
0
of maleic anhydride (Scheme 4). In our experiments,
exposure of both diisopropyl azodicarboxylate and
hydrazide to the oxidative work-up induced no change,
M.; Harris, G. D.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989,
3
0, 5709–5712.
7. Dandapani, S.; Curran, D. P. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
751–8757.
. Downie, I.; Heaney, H.; Kemp, G. Angew. Chem. 1975,
7, 357–358.
. Brewster, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 6364–6368.
0. Koppel, I.; Koppel, J.; Degerbeck, F.; Grehn, L.; Rag-
narsson, U. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 7172–7174; Koppel,
I.; Koppel, J.; Leito, L.; Pihl, V.; Wallin, A.; Grehn, L.;
Ragnarsson, U. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin. Trans. 2 1993, 655–
658.
1
according to H NMR analysis. This is perhaps not sur-
8
prising given the rather brief exposure to peroxide in the
absence of a catalyst. Even so, it would seem advisable
to take the appropriate precautions when handling the
silica gel residues from this new work-up procedure, in
view of the possible presence of some level of N-oxides.
8
9
3
1
In summary, this simple procedure should obviate the
need for formal chromatography in Mitsunobu reactions
in general. No doubt, it will not be suitable for every
Mitsunobu reaction. For example, divalent sulfur atoms
might be vulnerable to at least partial oxidation during
the brief exposure to peroxide. However, the exposure
time required is less than 2 min. When a sample of 1,3-
dithiane was exposed to 15% hydrogen peroxide, in a
close mimic of the work-up procedure, there was no
1
1
1. Martin, S. F.; Dodge, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
3
017–3020; Dodge, J. A.; Trujillo, J. I.; Presnell, M. J.
Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 234–236.
2. Barrett, A. G. M.; Braddock, D. C.; James, R. A.; Koike,
N.; Procopiou, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6273–6280.
3. Pasto, D. J.; Taylor, R. T. Org. React. 1991, 40, 91–155.
4. Buyle, R.; Van Overstraeten, A. Chem. Ind. (London)
1
1
1
964, 839.
1
oxidation at sulfur according to H NMR analysis.
15. Carpino, L. A.; Crowley, P. J. Org. Synth. 1973, Col. Vol.
5, 160–162.
16. Rabjohn, N. Org. Synth. 1955, Col. Vol. 3, 375–377.
Although we cannot be completely confident that this
will always be the case, the signs are clearly good. Amines
would normally be protected anyway, so should not un-
dergo oxidation, as indicated by entries 1–6 in Table 1.
The neutrality of the work-up also suggests that epoxida-
tions of olefinic bonds conjugated to carbonyl groups, by
a Michael addition mechanism, should not occur.
1
1
1
7. Cohen, S. G.; Zand, R.; Steel, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961,
8
3, 2895–2900.
8. Moriarty, R. M.; Prakash, I.; Penmasta, R. Synth.
Commun. 1987, 17, 409–413.
9. Nakata, M.; Kawazoe, S.; Tamai, T.; Tatsuta, K.;
Ishiwata, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Okuno, Y.; Deushi, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6095–6098.
Hence, this procedure, while not completely free of the
need for silica gel, should represent a very significant
saving of time and effort.
2
0. Mortarini, V.; Calvino, R.; Gasco, A.; Ferrarotti, B.;
Sanfilippo, A.; Schioppacassi, G. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
1980, 15, 475–478.