Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
SYNTHESIS AND LUMINESCENT PROPERTIES OF COORDINATION COMPOUNDS
1211
The energy difference between the T1 term of the
of the ligand (3 mmol) to pH 6. Then, lanthanide
chloride (1 mmol) in 5 mL of a 1 : 1 ethanol–water
mixture was added dropwise to the reaction mixture at
vigorous stirring. The solution with the formed
precipitate was stirred during 1 h. The precipitate was
filtered off, sequentially washed with distilled water
and with ethanol, and dried at 80°C to constant mass.
1H NMR spectra were registered using a JNM ECA
400 (JEOL) spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded
using a Vertex 70 (Bruker) Fourier spectrometer
equipped with an ATR attachment (4000–400 cm–1).
Elemental analysis (C, H) was performed using a
Vario EL III (Elementar) analyzer; the metal content
was determined via complexonometric titration.
Luminescent spectra were obtained with a Flyuorat-02-
Panorama spectrofluorimeter.
5
ligand and the D4 one of Tb3+ ion (20500 cm–1) in the
2500–4000 cm–1 range has been found optimal for the
intermolecular transfer of excitation energy from
organic ligand to lanthanide ion [5]. In the studied
case, the resonance term of Tb3+ ion was higher in
energy than the triplet levels of para-dodecyloxy-
benzoate and para-octadecyloxybenzoate anions; there-
fore, luminescence was not observed for those complexes.
Similarly, for Eu3+ complexes, the optimal energy
gap between the T1 term of the ligand and the 5D0 term
(17200 cm-1) of Eu3+ ion should fall in the 2500–
3500 cm–1 range [5]. In the studied case, it was of
3241 cm–1 for europium(III) para-dodecyloxybenzoate
and of 2847 cm–1 for europium(III) para-octadecyloxy-
benzoate, matching the indicated limits. Therefore, the
efficient excitation energy transfer from the ligands to
Eu3+ ion should be operative for those complexes; that
was confirmed by the experimental luminescence spectra.
Moreover, the integral intensity of luminescence of
europium(III) complex with para-dodecyloxybenzoic
acid was 1.5 times higher than of that with para-
octadecyloxybenzoate acid and 4.3 times higher than
for europium(III) benzoate used as reference.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 14-03-
00830) and the Ministry of Education and Science in
the frame of the governmental contract (no. 007-
01114-16 PR 0256-2014-0009).
Synthesis of para-alkoxybenzoic acids was per-
formed as described elsewhere [6]. The corresponding
alkyl bromide was added to a solution of para-
hydroxybenzoic acid (1.18 g) in 30 mL of ethanol, and
then a solution of KOH (1.69 g in 60 mL of ethanol)
was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred
at 60°C during 14 h. The precipitate was filtered off
and dried at 80°C to constant mass.
para-Dodecyloxybenzoic acid (HL1). Yield 58.9%.
IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 2700–2500 (O–H), 1673 (C=O).
1Н NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 10.00 s (1Н, COOH), 8.05
d (2H, HAr, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.94 (2H, HAr, J = 8.8 Hz),
4.04 t (2H, OCH2, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.27–1.84 m (20H,
CH2), 0.88 t (3H, CH3, J = 6.8 Hz). Found, %: С 74.55;
Н 9.75. C19H30O3. Calculated, %: С 74.51; Н 9.80.
REFERENCES
1. Armelao, L., Quici, S., Barigelletti, F., Accorsi, G.,
Bottaro, G., Cavazzini, M., and Tondello, E., Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2010, vol. 254, nos. 5–6, p. 487. DOI:
10.1016/j.ccr.2009.07.025.
2. Kolechko, D.V., Kolokolov, F.A., Oflidi, A.I., Pikula, A.A.,
Panyushkin, V.T., Mikhailov, I.E., and Dushenko, G.A.,
Doklady Chem., 2011, vol. 441, no. 2, p. 374. DOI:
10.1134/S0012500811120068.
3. Kolechko, D.V., Kolokolov, F.A., Mikhailov, I.E., and
Dushenko, G.A., RF Patent no. 2418032, 2009.
4. Panyushkin, V.T., Spektrokhimiya koordinatsionnykh
soedinenii RZE (Spectrochemistry of Coordination
Compounds of Rare Earth Elements), Rostov-on-Don:
Izd. Rostov. Univ., 1984.
para-Octadecyloxybenzoic acid (HL2). Yield 55.7%.
IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 2700–2500 (O–H), 1670 (C=O).
1Н NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 10.02 s (1Н, COOH), 8.04
d (2H, HAr, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.92 (2H, HAr, J = 8.7 Hz),
4.01 t (2H, OCH2, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.26–1.83 m (32H,
CH2), 0.87 t (3H, CH3, J = 6.8 Hz). Found, %: С 76.97;
Н 10.82. C25H42O3. Calculated, %: С 76.92; Н 10.77.
5. Zolin, V.F., Puntus, L.N., Tsaryuk, V.I., Kudryashova, V.A.,
Legendziewicz, J., Gawryszewska, P., and Szostak, R.,
J. Alloys Compd., 2004, vol. 380 p. 279. DOI: 10.1016/
j.jallcom.2004.03.055.
6. Veerabhadraswamy, B.N., Rao, D.S.S., Prasad, S.K.,
and Yelamaggad, C.V., New J. Chem., 2015, vol. 39,
p. 2011. DOI: 10.1039/c4nj02011a.
7. Sintezy
soedinenii
redkozemel’nykh
elementov
Synthesis of complexes 1–6 was performed ac-
cording to the procedure in [7]. An alcoholic solution
of NaOH was added dropwise to an alcoholic solution
(Syntheses of the Compounds of Rare Earth Elements),
Serebryannikov, V.A., Ed., Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ.,
1983.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 86 No. 5 2016