3110 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 10, 2000
Mukhopadhyay et al.
Exp er im en ta l Section
amounts of THAC (Table 1, entries 10-14) facilitate
conversion without affecting product selectivity because
THAC stabilizes the small palladium clusters and retards
catalyst deactivation caused by aggregation. Indeed,
stabilization of Rh0 and Pd0 clusters using quaternary
ammonium salts has been discussed at length,18a-c and
their roles in regenerating PdCl2 from Pd0 complexes
using 1,2-dichloroethane has also been studied.18d,e The
solvent apparently plays a similar role (Table 1, entries
16-18).
The typical pseudo first-order rate constants observed
in this tandem system (kobs ∼ 10-6 s-1) are significantly
lower than those observed in any of the reductive or
oxidative parent systems. Thus, for the stoichiometric
reaction 2C6H6 + PdCl2 + 2NaOAc f C6H5-C6H5 + Pd0
+ 2NaCl + 2AcOH, kobs ∼ 10-3 s-1 (ref 12); for the
stoichiometric reaction 2C6H5Cl + Pd0 f C6H5-C6H5 +
Pd2+ + 2Cl-, kobs ∼ 10-3 - 10-4 s-1 (ref 10a); and for the
palladium-catalyzed reductive coupling of chlorobenzenes
kobs ∼ 10-3 - 10-4 s-1 (depending on the reagent used to
regenerate the Pd0 catalyst).10b,11 This may reflect the low
concentration of the active palladium clusters required
to catalyze the reductive coupling.
Another route to biphenyl may be envisaged through
formation of PhPdCl, followed by cross coupling as in
PhPdCl + PhH f Ph-Ph + Pd(0) + HCl. However,
though bromobenzene and iodobenzene undergo Heck-
type reactions with a catalytic amount of Pd and with
styrene, chlorobenzene cannot. Indeed, such a reaction
would be potentially useful for mild cross-coupling of
chloroaryls as in PhPdCl + PhMe f Ph-PhMe + Pd(0)
+ HCl, but unfortunately, when we tried it, it did not
work.
Instrumentation, experimental apparatus, and product
isolation and identification methods have been described in
detail previously.10,11
P r ep a r a tion of a Colloid a l Disp er sion of P d 0 in Ben -
zen e. This is a modification of a published procedure.19 An
aqueous solution of 0.53 g of (14 mmol) NaBH4 was added
dropwise over 1 h to a reaction mixture containing 0.50 g (2.8
mmol) of PdCl2, 1.0 g (2.3 mmol) of THAC, and 10 g of C6H6
at 27 °C. The mixture was stirred for 2 h, after which the
benzene layer after phase separation was directly taken for
the reaction.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Cou p lin g. Example: biphenyl
from C6H6 and C6H5Cl. Amounts of 7.8 g (100 mmol) of C6H6,
11.27 g (100 mmol) of C6H5Cl, 1.0 g (2.3 mol %) of THAC, 0.5
g (2.8 mol %) of PdCl2, 13.6 g (100 mmol) of NaOAc, and 40
mL of AcOH were charged to an autoclave as above. Reaction
progress was monitored by GC. The mixture was stirred (1000
rpm) at 105 °C for 36 h and cooled, and the solvent was
removed by distillation. Water (30 mL) was added, and the
product mixtures were extracted in of CHCl3 (4 × 15 mL).
Solvent evaporation and recrystallization afforded 4.6 g of
biphenyl (30 mol % based on C6H6; repeating the reaction four
times gave 27%, 29%, 28%, and 28%, respectively), mp 68.5
°C (from cold EtOH) (lit.,20 69-71 °C). Found: C, 93.27; H,
6.68. C12H10 requires C, 93.46; H, 6.54%. δH (CDCl3; Me4Si)
7.37 (2H, tt, aromatic 4,4′-H, J 7.2 and 1.3), 7.46 (4H, tt,
aromatic 3,3′,5,5′-H J 7.1 and 1.0), 7.58 (4H, dq, aromatic
2,2′,6,6′-H J 7.0 and 1.2). Good agreement was found with
literature values.21
Exp er im en ta l P r oced u r e for Kin etic Stu d ies. Condi-
tions and apparatus were similar to general coupling procedure
given above. The following parameters were studied: (i)
benzene concentration, (three experiments at 2.0 M, kobs ) 4.55
× 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.995 for 7 observations; 2.5 M, kobs ) 4.97 ×
10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.999 for 7 observations; and 3.0 M, kobs ) 5.19
× 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.998 for seven observations); (ii) chlorobenzene
concentration, (three experiments at 2.0 M, kobs ) 4.58 × 10-6
s-1, r2 ) 0.997 for 7 observations; 2.5 M, kobs ) 4.94 × 10-6
s-1, r2 ) 0.999 for seven observations; and 3.0 M, kobs ) 5.33
× 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.994 for seven observations); (iii) initial PdCl2
loading, (four experiments using 0.0175 M, kobs ) 1.25 × 10-6
s-1, r2 ) 0.995 for seven observations; 0.035 M, kobs ) 2.4 ×
10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.997 for seven observations; 0.07 M, kobs ) 4.97
× 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.999 for seven observations; and 0.14 M, kobs
) 9.7 × 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.999 for seven observations); and (iv)
reaction temperature, (four experiments at 75 °C, kobs ) 1.13
× 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.98 for seven observations; 85 °C, kobs ) 2.0
Con clu sion
Two noncatalytic processes, the homogeneous oxidative
homocoupling of benzene to biphenyl using PdCl2, and
the reductive heterogeneous homocoupling of chloroben-
zene (also to biphenyl) using Pd0, can be combined in situ
to obtain a closed catalytic cycle based on the Pd2+ S Pd0
redox transformation. A key feature of this system is the
interchanging of the palladium catalyst between homo-
geneous (PdCl2) and heterogeneous (Pd0) forms. The
concept of two different substrates “converging” on the
same is a step toward waste minimization. In this study,
the cheaper, but normally inactive, aryl chlorides were
employed. Practical application of this process is limited
(to a certain extent by its own mechanism), by low
catalyst turnover and moderate yields, compared with
either the reductive or the oxidative stoichiometric
processes. Optimizing applications of this concept to other
substrates requires further research, which is currently
in progress in our lab.
× 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.997 for seven observations; 95 °C, kobs
kobs ) 4.97 × 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.999 for seven observations).
)
2.97 × 10-6 s-1, r2 ) 0.997 for seven observations; and 105 °C,
Ack n ow led gm en t. We are grateful to Dr. Dave J .
Adams (York Green Chemistry Group, The University
of York) for valuable comments and to Dr. J acques
Muzart (University of Reims) for discussions and pre-
prints. G.R. thanks the Royal Society and the Israeli
Academy of Sciences and Humanities for an exchange
fellowship to visit the York Green Chemistry Group.
J O991868E
(18) (a) Weddle, K. S.; Aiken, J . D., III; Finke, R. G. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 5653. (b) Reetz, M. T.; Helbig, W.; Quaiser, S. A.;
Stimming, U.; Brever, N.; Vogel, R. Science 1995, 267, 367. (c) See
also Rothenberg, G.; Barak, G.; Sasson, Y. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6301.
(d) A¨ıt-Mohand, S.; He´nin, F.; Muzart, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
2473. (e) Bouquillon, S.; du Moulinet d'Hardemare, A.; Averbuch-
Pouchot, M.; He´nin, F.; Muzart, J . Polyhedron 1999, in press.
(19) Rothenberg, G.; Feldberg, L.; Wiener, H.; Sasson, Y. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 2429.
(20) Tamura, Y.; Chun, M.-W.; Inoue, K.; Minamikawa, J . Synthesis
1978, 822.
(21) Kamewaza, N. J . Magn. Reson. 1973, 11, 88.