RESEARCH FRONT
Photoswitchable Sensitization of Porphyrin Excited States
173
(consistent with the fluorescence results), the 45-ps compo-
nent to ground-state equilibration of the cyclic form,[25] and
the non-decaying portion to light-induced conversion of some
of the cyclic form to the open form. At the same wavelength,
dyad 2b gave a rising component with a time constant of
5.6 ps followed by a decay of 6.4 ns. The rise is ascribed
to the disappearance of the fulgimide stimulated emission
and corresponding rise of the porphyrin transient absorption
resulting from singlet–singlet energy transfer. Zinc dyad 1b
also gave a rise (4.0 ps, energy transfer from the fulgimide to
the porphyrin) followed by a decay (900 ps, decay of the zinc
porphyrin excited state).
the presence of the energy transfer pathway for deactivation
of the excited state. Because a small fraction of the photons
absorbed by the cyclic fulgimide lead to photoisomerization
rather than energy transfer, continued visible irradiation will
eventually lead to a reduction and eventual elimination of the
antenna effect, whereupon UV excitation would be necessary
to reset the device to its ‘on’ state.
Descriptions of syntheses and instrumental techniques are
availablefromtheauthorsor, untilMarch2011, theAustralian
Journal of Chemistry.
Thus, the spectroscopic data indicate very rapid singlet–
singlet energy transfer from the excited state of the cyclic
fulgimide to the attached porphyrin in both the zinc and
free base dyads. No antenna function is observed when the
fulgimides are in the open form. From the transient data,
the energy transfer rate constants (kent) may be calculated
from the expression kent = τs−1 − kd, where τs is the lifetime
of the excited singlet state of the cyclic fulgimide in the
presence of energy transfer and kd is the rate constant for
decay of this state in the absence of energy transfer (taken
as 1/135 ps from model 5). For free base dyad 2b kent is
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the US National Science Founda-
tion (CHE-0352599). This is publication 649 from the ASU
Center for the Study of Early Events in Photosynthesis.
References
[1] H. A. Frank, A. Cua, V. Chynwat, A. Young, D. J. Gosztola,
M. R. Wasielewski, Photosynth. Res. 1994, 41, 389. doi:10.1007/
BF02183041
[2] B. Robert, P. Horton, A. A. Pascal, A. V. Ruban, Trends Plant Sci.
2004, 9, 385. doi:10.1016/J.TPLANTS.2004.06.006
[3] N. E. Holt, G. R. Fleming, K. K. Niyogi, Biochemistry 2004, 43,
8281. doi:10.1021/BI0494020
1.7 × 1011 s−1 and for zinc dyad 1b kent is 2.4 × 1011 s−1
.
The quantum yields of energy transfer, calculated from these
rate data, are 95% and 96% for the free base and zinc dyads,
respectively.
[4] H. A. Frank, J. A. Bautista, J. S. Josue, A. J. Young, Biochemistry
2000, 39, 2831. doi:10.1021/BI9924664
In order to examine the reversibility of the system, the
porphyrin emission intensity at 650 nm (λex 470 nm) was
measured as a function of cycling the photochrome in
dyad 2 through its isomeric forms (Fig. 2b). The exper-
iments were carried out in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran after
deoxygenation by argon bubbling for 15 min. When the
fulgimide is in the open form, a low-emission intensity is
observed, due to the small porphyrin extinction coefficient
at 470 nm. Irradiation at 366 nm (1.5 mW cm−2) for 2 min
converts the fulgimide into the visible-absorbing C-form,
giving rise to more intense porphyrin emission due to
highly efficient energy transfer. Irradiation with visible light
(450 < λ < 650 nm, ∼10.5 mW cm−2) for 3 min converts the
fulgimide back to the open form and the emission inten-
sity again drops. After twelve switching cycles only minimal
degradation was observed.
These experiments show that light can be used to switch
thefulgimideofdyads1and 2betweenanopenformthatdoes
not act as a visible-light-absorbing antenna for the attached
porphyrin and a cyclic form that transfers excitation with
efficiencies ≥95%. Thus, photoisomerization of the photo-
chrome may be used to efficiently switch sensitization of
the porphyrin excited states on or off. Because porphyrin
excited states can perform many useful photochemical func-
tions, including photoinduced electron transfer, this switch
could be useful in the design of porphyrin-based molecu-
lar switches and logic gates. It could also provide a control
mechanism for light harvesting in artificial antenna–reaction
centre complexes. The photoinduced ring opening of the
cyclic fulgimide in 1b and 2b occurs, but the quantum yield
is reduced greatly, relative to the model compound, due to
[5] C. Kulheim, J. Ågren, S. Jansson, Science 2002, 297, 91.
doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1072359
[6] D. Gust, T. A. Moore, in The Porphyrin Handbook (Eds
K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith, R. Guilard) 2000, Vol. 8, Ch. 57,
pp. 153–190 (Academic Press: New York, NY).
[7] G. Kodis, P.A. Liddell, L. de la Garza, P. C. Clausen, J. S. Lindsey,
A. L. Moore, T. A. Moore, D. Gust, J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106,
2036. doi:10.1021/JP012133S
[8] D. Kuciauskas, P. A. Liddell, S. Lin, T. E. Johnson, S. J. Weghorn,
J. S. Lindsey, A. L. Moore, T. A. Moore, D. Gust, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 8604. doi:10.1021/JA991255J
[9] G. Kodis, Y. Terazono, P. A. Liddell, J. Andréasson, V. Garg,
M. Hambourger, T.A. Moore,A. L. Moore, D. Gust, J.Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 129, in press. doi:10.1021/JA055903C
[10] J. Andréasson, G. Kodis, Y. Terazono, P. A. Liddell,
S. Bandyopadhyay, R. H. Mitchell, T. A. Moore, A. L. Moore,
D. Gust, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15926. doi:10.1021/
JA045577L
[11] J. L. Bahr, G. Kodis, L. de la Garza, S. Lin, A. L. Moore,
T. A. Moore, D. Gust, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7124.
doi:10.1021/JA010058T
[12] P. A. Liddell, G. Kodis, A. L. Moore, T. A. Moore, D. Gust,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7668. doi:10.1021/JA026327C
[13] P. A. Liddell, G. Kodis, J. Andréasson, L. de la Garza,
S. Bandyopadhyay, R. H. Mitchell, T. A. Moore, A. L. Moore,
D. Gust, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4803. doi:10.1021/
JA039800A
[14] S. D. Straight, J.Andréasson, G. Kodis,A. L. Moore,T.A. Moore,
D. Gust, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2717. doi:10.1021/
JA044128I
[15] S. D. Straight, J. Andréasson, G. Kodis, S. Bandyopadhyay,
R. H. Mitchell, T. A. Moore, A. L. Moore, D. Gust, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 9403. doi:10.1021/JA051218U
[16] Y. Terazono, G. Kodis, J. Andréasson, G. Jeong, A. Brune,
T. Hartmann, H. Dürr, A. L. Moore, T. A. Moore, D. Gust, J. Phys.
Chem. B 2004, 108, 1812. doi:10.1021/JP037005D