1000
KARPOV et al.
Table 4. Corrosion resistance of St.3 steel in hydrated RT
K
K
=
,
(2)
jet fuel in the presence of 2-aminothiazole derivatives
K
4
I IV (98 C, additive concentration 5 10 M)
where K is the corrosion activity of the fuel contain-
ing an additive (g m ).
Additive
K, g m 2
2
1
.71
The corrosion activities and corrosion inhibition
factors are listed in Table 4.
I
II
III
IV
Ionol
1.32
1.24
0.78
0.57
1.36
0.30
0.38
1.19
2.00
0.26
Thus, 2-aminothiazole derivatives show high anti-
corrosive power and surpass commercial inhibitor
Ionol in performance. Along with the already noted
inhibition of acid formation in fuel, the mechanism of
the anticorrosive effect of 2-aminothiazole derivatives
may also involve formation of a monomolecular layer
of compounds (as a rule, coordination compounds) on
the metal surface, insulating it from the hydrocarbon
medium [19].
an electron-donor methyl substituent exhibits the
strongest biocidal effect, whereas compounds III and
IV, containing aromatic substituents lowering the
electron density in the thiazole ring, show a weak
biological activity.
CONCLUSIONS
It is believed that antioxidants mainly behave as
biocides [15]. However, as shown in Table 3, com-
mercial oxidation inhibitor Ionol shows no biocidal
effect at all.
(1) 2-Aminothiazole derivatives exhibit biocidal
properties and can be used as additives to RT and
TS-1 jet fuels.
As biocidal additives are used ammonia and amine
derivatives, potassium permanganate, copper sulfate,
zinc chloride, and a number of organic compounds
(2) The biocidal properties of I IV depend on the
nature of a 4-substituent.
(3) Aminothiazoles I IV exhibit anticorrosive
[
[
16]. However, many of them stimulate corrosion
17]. The corrosion activity of hydrocarbon media
activity in RT fuel under conditions of water conden-
sation.
toward metal surfaces is, in particular, due to acids
18] formed by oxidation. 2-Aminothiazole deriva-
[
REFERENCES
tives, inhibiting oxidation of hydrocarbons [5], de-
crease the probability of corrosion. To evaluate unam-
biguously the anticorrosive effect of I IV, we deter-
mined the corrosive activity of RT fuel in the presence
of test compounds according to GOST 18597 73. It
was evaluated by the weight loss of a metallic plate
1
. Manian, A.K., Khadse, B.G., Kirtikar, P.A., and
Sengupta, S.R., Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 1991, vol. 53,
no. 3, pp. 102 103.
. US Patent 5856347.
. FRG Patent Appl. 19719053.
. Uchikawa, O., Fukatsu, K., Suno, M., et al., Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 1996, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2070 2077.
. US Patent 3201409.
. Kelarev, V.I., Gracheva, O.G., Silin, M.A., et al.,
Nefte pererab. Neftekhim. (Moscow), 1997, no. 12,
pp. 29 32.
. Sablina, Z.A. and Gureev, A.A., Prisadki k motornym
toplivam (Additives to Motor Fuels), Moscow: Khi-
miya, 1977.
2
3
4
(
St.3 steel) immersed in a fuel for 4 h under condi-
tions of fuel saturation with water and its condensa-
tion on the plate. The corrosion activity of fuels under
conditions of water condensation, K (g m ), was cal-
5
6
2
culated by the formula
(m
m )
h
1
7
K =
,
(1)
S
where m is the plate weight before the test (g), m is
8. Koval’, E.Z. and Sidorenko, L.P., Mikodestruktory
promyshlennykh materialov (Fungi Decomposing In-
dustrial Materials), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1989.
1
the plate weight after the test (g), h is the etching con-
stant (g), S is the area of the top and side surfaces of
2
9
. Hedrick, H., Carroll, M.T., Owen, H.P., and Prit-
chard, D.J., Appl. Microbiol., 1963, vol. 11, no. 6,
pp. 472 478.
the plate (m ; the bottom surface is in contact with the
vessel bottom and does not participate in corrosion).
The corrosion inhibition factor was calculated by
the formula
10. Oganicheskie reaktsii, Kochetkov, N.K. and Volodi-
na, V.S, Eds., Moscow: Mir, 1953, vol. 6.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 74 No. 6 2001