V. Balakumar, et al.
Ultrasonics-Sonochemistry59(2019)104738
Table 1
Photocatalytic activity of different CeO2 based catalysts for the photo-reduction of Cr6+
.
Materials
Catalyst weight (mg)
Cr Concentration
Time (min)
Efficiency (%)
Catalyst stability cycles
Ref.
CeO2-TiO2
50
2 mM
180
60
99.6
99.6
–
3
–
5
4
–
6
–
5
9
CeO2@Bi2WO6
CeO2/SnS2
20
8 mg/L
10
300
50
50 mg/L
0.1 mM
5.0 mg/L
20 mg/L
100 mg/mL
0.1 mM
80
11
Pd/CeO2/g-C3N4
CeO2@Pt@TiO2
CeO2-QDs/BiOX
Y-CeO2/PCN
CeO2@PPy
40
–
25
30
150
60
99.0
97.0
98.1
98.6
40
50
41
120
10
240
45
42
This work
can be seen clearly that the outside of the as-prepared CeO2 particles
surface was uniformly coated with PPy shell showing distinctly dif-
ferent from the CeO2 core. The SAED lattice fringes of CeO2@PPy core-
shell nanosphere exhibited a spacing of 0.27 nm (Fig. 4D), which is in
good agreement with the XRD results.
In acidic pH the catalyst surface can create positively charges and Cr6+
gets negative charged species (HCrO4− and Cr2O72−), leading to strong
adsorption of Cr6+ on the catalyst surface, consequently increase to
photocatalytic reduction rate [1,14]. On the other hand, in higher pH,
the catalyst surface became negatively charged, which repels Cr6+
species and the conversion products of Cr3+ can be easily precipitated
in basic conditions [43]. According to this, the amount of Cr6+ ab-
sorption and rate of reduction efficiency was achieved at lower pH.
In order to find an optimum dosage of the CeO2@PPy core-shell, the
pH and Cr6+ concentration was kept constant and the amount of cat-
alyst varying from 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mg were tested. In addition, the
degradation percentage was calculated as shown in Fig. 7B. According
has been achieved higher photocatalytic detoxification. Moreover,
lower or higher amount of catalyst loaded solutions had poor activity
because of fewer active sites and solar light inhibition in solution, re-
spectively [44,45]. These are the reasons to reduce the degradation
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy is used to measure the optical ab-
sorption property of the PPy, CeO2 and core-shell structure of CeO2@
PPy nanosphere as hown in Fig. 5A. The pure PPy showed the char-
acteristic absorption edge at about 500 nm as shown in Fig. 4a (curve
a). The pure CeO2 light absorption peak was observed at 310 nm
(Fig. 5A (curve b)) and the corresponding to a band gap (Eg) of 3.01 eV
[25,38] due to electron transition from oxygen to cerium [39]. When
optical absorption was enhanced to the range of the visible region
compared to pure CeO2, resulting from the PPy. The Tauc’s equation
was used to determine the band gap energy of PPy, CeO2 and CeO2@
PPy core-shell nanosphere and the graph plotted (αhν)2 against the
photon energy (hν). The band gap values were found to be 1.95 (PPy),
3.01 (CeO2) and 2.46 Ev (CeO2@PPy) in Fig. 5B.
Fig. 7C shows the effect of Cr6+ initial concentration on detox-
ification using CeO2@PPy core-shell under visible light irradiation. The
good degradation percentage (98.2%) were achieved in the initial
concentration of Cr6+. It was clearly observed that the enhancement of
Cr6+ concentration reduce the rate of conversion since the higher Cr6+
prevents light on the catalyst with the reduction of generation for
electrons and hole-pairs [45,46]. Furthermore, the minimum con-
centration of Cr6+ completely adsorbed on to the catalyst surface and
generation of active species increases leading to the enhancement of the
conversion percentage.
3.2. Photocatalytic detoxification of Cr6+
In Fig. 6A, the photocatalytic activities of PPy, CeO2 and CeO2@PPy
were described, showing the reduction of hexavalent chromium to tri-
valent chromium under the visible light. The Cr6+ photolytic de-
gradation was negligible in the absence of the catalyst. The Cr6+ de-
gradation in the presence of pure PPy and CeO2 were investigated and
the results showed slightly degradation (48 and 69%, respectively) as
shown in Fig. 6B. In contrast, nearly 100% of Cr6+ was degraded with
(30 min) irradiation in the presence of CeO2@PPy photocatalyst under
the same conditions. As shown in Fig. 6A, the absorption peak intensity
of Cr6+ ions were drastically decreased and finally disappear as much
as irradiation time increased [25]. Complete reduction of toxic Cr6+ to
Cr3+ was clearly observed within 30 min. Also the yellow color of Cr6+
was changed to colorless, indicating the reduction of hazard Cr6+ to
benign Cr3+. These results indicated that core-shell CeO2@PPy photo-
catalyst is obviously superior to pure CeO2 and PPy as well as me-
chanical mixing of CeO2@PPy. The Cr6+ reduction rate constant k of
photocatalysts was evaluated by ln (C0/Ct) against t, showing that the
value for PPy, CeO2 and CeO2@PPy core-shell are found to be 0.0012,
0.0097 and 0.0639 min−1, respectively. The CeO2@PPy core-shell is
compared with other reported CeO2 based photocatalysts for the re-
3.4. Possible charge separation and degradation mechanism
Based on the experimental analysis above, a charge separation and
Cr6+ degradation mechanism of CeO2@PPy nanospheres has been
proposed in Fig. 8. It was well-known that both PPy and CeO2 can
generate electrons and holes under visible light irradiation. The gen-
erated electrons migrated from HOMO of PPy and VB of CeO2 to LOMO
of PPy and CB of CeO2 respectively. Further, the LUMO of PPy electrons
can be directly injected into the CB of CeO2. However, the LUMO po-
tential of PPy is more negative than CB of CeO2. Finally, the gathered
electrons in CB of CeO2 can react with surface adsorbed oxygen mole-
cules to generate super oxide radical anions [38,47,48]. Simulta-
neously, the excited holes produced by CeO2 are injected into the
HOMO of PPy due to the difference in valence band edge potentials and
then it was reacted with water molecules to generate hydroxide radicals
[49]. These generated super oxide radical anions and hydroxide radi-
cals are easily degrading the adsorbed contaminants. Obviously, the
upgrading of photocatalytic activity induced by the synergistic effect of
CeO2 and PPy had efficient charge separation and reduce the rate of
recombination.
3.3. Optimization of various parameters
In various pH (pH 2, 5, 7 and 9), the Cr6+ degradation efficiency
was studied by fixing other parameters (catalyst weight, Cr6+ con-
centration) constant as shown in Fig. 7A. This figure can clearly show
that the maximum detoxification of Cr6+ was observed in acid solution.
6