T. Liu, C. Wang, W. Wang et al.
Journal of Alloys and Compounds 867 (2021) 159085
supporter in this study. The as-prepared Ag/ZnFe
2
O
4
nanocomposites
2.4. Photocatalytic wastewater treatment: SAM degradation and Cr6+
reduction
showed significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity in sulfanilamide
6+
(
2 4
SAM) degradation and Cr photoreduction. In addition, the Ag/ZnFe O
nanocomposites retained the magnetic separable properties, which was
necessary for practical application. Furthermore, the possible me-
The catalytic activity through Ag/ZnFe
conducted by SAM photodegradation and Cr reduction. Typically,
2
O
4
6
nanocomposites was
+
6+
chanism of charge separation in Ag/ZnFe
cess were also discussed. The Ag/ZnFe
2
O
O
4
4
during photocatalysis pro-
nanocomposites could be
20 mg sample was dispersed in 50 mL 20 mg/L SAM or Cr aqueous
solution. The pH of Cr6+ solution was adjusted to 2 with H
SO (1 M).
2
2
4
considered potentially for water purification due to the outstanding
performance in simulated wastewater treatment process.
Before light irradiation, the adsorption-desorption equilibrium was
established after the mixture was stirred in dark for 1 h. Then a
300 W Xe lamp with 400 nm cut-off was used to illuminate the
2
. Experimental section
photodegradation system. About 4 mL solution was withdrawn at a
given time interval and then centrifuged to separate solid catalyst for
further analysis. The photocatalytic activity was estimated according
to the maximum absorption wavelength (λmax = 258 nm) of SAM [18]
and the colored Cr(VI)-diphenylcarbazide method (λmax = 540 nm)
[19] monitored on UV–Vis spectrometer (UV-1201).
2.1. Preparation of Ag nanowires
Ag nanowires were prepared via a hydrothermal method according
3
to the following steps: 0.5 g AgNO and 1.0 g polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)
were dissolved into 40 mL mixed solution containing 37 mL ethylene
glycol (EG) and 3 mL glycerol. After 500 µL 0.5 mg/mL NaCl/EG solution
was added into the mixture, the whole reaction system was transferred
into the 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and reacted at
3
. Results and discussion
3
.1. XRD analysis
120 °C for 3 h. The gray mixture after the reaction was washed and
centrifuged with absolute ethanol for several times. The Ag nanowires
were obtained after drying at 60 °C overnight.
The crystallographic structure of as-obtained Ag/ZnFe
composites were studied by XRD (Fig. 1). Pure ZnFe exhibited dif-
fraction peaks at 31.8°, 35.5°, 42.7°, 47.5°, 56.6°, 62.8° and 68.1°, which
confirmed the cubic structure of ZnFe (JCPDS No. 22-1012). After
sample were loaded onto Ag nanorods, the diffraction peaks of
remained the same except for four additional peaks positioned
2 4
O nano-
2 4
O
2 4
2.2. Preparation of Ag/ZnFe O nanoarchitectures
2 4
O
ZnFe
ZnFe
2
O
4
2 4 2 4
Ag/ZnFe O nanoarchitectures with ZnFe O nanoparticles de-
2
O
4
corated Ag nanowires were fabricated as described below: 1 mmol
at 38°, 44°, 66° and 77° corresponding to the metallic Ag (JCPDS No.
5–2871). The purity of Ag/ZnFe nanocomposites were evident be-
.
3 2 2 2
Zn(CH COO) 2H O, 2 mmol FeCl and certain amount of Ag nano-
6
2 4
O
wires were dispersed in 30 mL deionized water with continuous
stirring for 2 h. After 1 mL ethylenediamine was added into the
solution, the whole mixture was stirred for another 1 h and trans-
ferred into 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and reacted
cause no other peaks were observed apart from the above-mentioned
3+
peaks. As is known to all, Ag element could react with Fe to generate
+
Ag ions, but in our fabrication process, ZnFe
2
O
4
was obtained from zinc
.
acetate {Zn(CH
3
COO)
2
2H
2
O} and ferrous chloride (FeCl ), which could
2
at 160 °C for 6 h. The Ag/ZnFe
after the products washed, centrifuged, and dried at 60 °C. Pure
ZnFe nanoparticles were synthesized under identical conditions
except for the addition of Ag nanowires. For simplicity, we denote
Ag/ZnFe samples with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% Ag content as
AgZFO5, AgZFO10, AgZFO15, AgZFO20 and AgZFO25. The pure
ZnFe sample was denoted as ZFO.
2 4
O nanocomposites were obtained
+
prevent the formation of Ag ions and destroy the structure of Ag na-
nowires. Moreover, the existence of metallic Ag also suggested the
stability of Ag during the preparation procedure and the feasible route
2 4
O
2 4
to prepare Ag/ZnFe O nanocomposites.
2 4
O
O
2 4
3.2. Morphological analysis
2
.3. Characterizations
The Ag/ZnFe
nanowires were fabricated through continuous hydrothermal stra-
tegies and the morphology of obtained Ag/ZnFe samples were
2 4 2 4
O nanocomposites with ZnFe O loading onto Ag
X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) was acquired to investigate the
2 4
O
crystal structure of Ag/ZnFe
O
2 4
samples on D8 Bruker advanced X-ray
viewed by SEM and TEM. From Fig. 2A we could find that uniform
diffractometer. Scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S-4800)
and Transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL, JEM-2100) were
employed to observe the microstructure and morphology of the
samples. X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) was carried out on
Thermo Fischer ESCALAB 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer
under an Al K
spectra were achieved from Shimadzu UV-2500 spectrophotometer
with BaSO as reference. The magnetism properties of pure ZnFe
and Ag/ZnFe nanocomposites were analyzed on VSM-7407 vi-
brating sample magnetometer (Lake Shore, USA). The electron spin
α
radiation (hv = 1486.6 eV). UV–Vis diffuse reflectance
4
2 4
O
2 4
O
-
resonance (ESR) signals of spin-trapped·O
2
radicals were acquired
from Bruker model ESR JES-FA300 spectrometer. The electrochemical
measurements were investigated by CHI-760E electrochemical work-
station with 0.5 M Na SO solution as electrolyte. The as-prepared
2 4
samples were regarded as working electrode. Ag/AgCl and platinum
were selected as reference electrode and counter electrode, respec-
tively. The PL spectra and time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL)
spectra of samples were recorded on an FL3-TCSPC fluorescence
spectrophotometer and time-resolved fluorescence spectrum
(Edinburgh FLS9800) with an excitation wavelength of 280 nm,
respectively.
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of as-obtained samples.
2