682
Y. He, C. Cai / Catalysis Communications 12 (2011) 678–683
Fig. 4. TEM images of (A) recovered catalyst after first run for the Suzuki reaction; and (B) recovered catalyst after sixth run for the Suzuki reaction.
obtained. Thus, we selected K2CO3 as the base, DMF/H2O in ratio of 1:1
as solvent, and 0.1 mol% of catalyst as the optimal conditions for the
reaction.
4. Conclusions
In summary, we have successfully prepared polymer supported
macrocyclic Schiff base palladium complex which was used as
heterogeneous catalyst for the room-temperature Suzuki cross-
coupling reaction. The catalyst has showed highly catalytic activities
for the reaction affording a diverse range of biphenyls in excellent
yields within 20–30 min, and could be easily recovered by simple
filtration and reused for 5 times without significant loss in its activity.
The excellent catalytic efficiency as well as the recyclability made
them an attractive alternative to the large number of heterogeneous
palladium catalysts reported to date.
Encouraged by the efficiency of the reaction protocol described
above, we investigated the substrate scope. As shown in Table 3, a
wide range of functional groups have also been tolerated in the
reaction. The coupling between aryl bromides and phenylboronic
acid, which contained electron-donating as well as electron-with-
drawing groups, proceeded readily to afford the corresponding
products in 90%–99% yields with high TOF (up to 2970 h−1). Mean-
while, the coupling reaction could be efficiently executed of aryl
boronic acids with electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups.
Then, we tried to examine whether aryl chlorides were active for the
Suzuki reaction. However, poor yields were obtained even for a
prolonged time at 50 °C (Table 3, entries 14 and 15).
References
[1] I.P. Beletskaya, A.V. Cheprakov, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 3009–3066.
[2] N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 2457–2483.
[3] A. Suzuki, J. Organomet. Chem. 576 (1999) 147–168.
[4] A. Suzuki, J. Organomet. Chem. 653 (2002) 83–90.
3.3. Catalyst reusability
The reusability of the catalyst is a very important theme and makes
them useful for commercial applications. At this point, the recovery
and reusability of the catalyst have been investigated using p-
bromoanisole with phenylboronic acid as model substrates. As
expected, the catalyst showed good reusability with a slight decrease
in its activity (Fig. 3) and the yields are 98%, 96%, 97%, 94%, 90% and
83%; however, 1 h and 2 h reaction time was required to runs 3, 4, and
runs 5, 6, respectively (TOF values drop from 2970 h−1 to 415 h−1).
The ICP analysis shows that palladium content of the catalyst doesn't
change after catalysis, indicating that no significant leaching of
palladium to the solution occurs during the catalytic processions. It's
believed that the amount of Pd leaching of the catalyst during the
reaction was not a key factor in decreasing the catalytic activity. The
TEM analysis of the structure of the catalyst refers to that the Pd of the
catalyst after the cross-coupling reaction was in nanoparticle size and
shape. Meanwhile, it was found that the size of the palladium (0)
nanoparticles inside the beads had increased from 2–5 nm to 20–
30 nm after the first run and sixth run (Fig. 4). Therefore, it was
reasoned that the slight decrease in catalytic activity in subsequent
runs may be due to the passivation of nanoclusters surface [34]. A
longer reaction time was used to compensate for the decreased
activity, resulting in an increase in coupling yield. Moreover, the
filtrate obtained from the filtration of the catalyst after catalysis
doesn't show any catalytic activity.
[5] S.P. Stanforth, Tetrahedron 54 (1998) 263–303.
[6] A.F. Littke, G.C. Fu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 4176–4211.
[7] S. Kotha, K. Lahiri, D. Kashinath, Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 9633–9695.
[8] M. Choi, D.H. Lee, K. Na, B.W. Yu, R. Ryoo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009)
3673–3676.
[9] V. Andrushko, D. Schwinn, C.C. Tzschucke, F. Michalek, J. Horn, C. Mossner, W.
Bannwarth, Helv. Chim. Acta 88 (2005) 936–949.
[10] C. Gonzalez-Arellano, A. Corma, M. Iglesias, F. Sanchez, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346
(2004) 1316–1328.
[11] Y. Li, X. Fu, B. Gong, X. Zou, X. Tu, J. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 322 (2010) 55–62.
[12] J.W. Byun, Y.S. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2004) 1837–1840.
[13] P.G. Steel, C.W.T. Teasdale, Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2004) 8977–8980.
[14] J.H. Kim, J.W. Kim, M. Shokouhimehr, Y.S. Lee, J. Org. Chem. 70 (2005) 6714–6720.
[15] J.W. Kim, J.H. Kim, D.H. Lee, Y.S. Lee, Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 4745–4748.
[16] J.C. Garcia-Martinez, R.W.J. Scott, R.M. Crooks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003)
11190–11191.
[17] R. van Heerbeek, P.C.J. Kamer, P. van Leeuwen, J.N.H. Reek, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002)
3717–3756.
[18] K. Inada, N. Miyaura, Tetrahedron 56 (2000) 8661–8664.
[19] C.A. Parrish, S.L. Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 66 (2001) 3820–3827.
[20] K. Glegola, E. Framery, K.M. Pietrusiewicz, D. Sinou, Adv. Synth. Catal. 348 (2006)
1728–1733.
[21] W.J. Sommer, M. Weck, Adv. Synth. Catal. 348 (2006) 2101–2113.
[22] R.B. Bedford, S.J. Coles, M.B. Hursthouse, V.J.M. Scordia, Dalton Trans. (2005)
991–995.
[23] A. Leyva, H. García, A. Corma, Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 7097–7111.
[24] T.J. Colacot, W.A. Carole, B.A. Neide, A. Harad, Organometallics. 27 (2008)
5605–5611.
[25] S. Schweizer, J.-M. Becht, C. Le Drian, Tetrahedron 66 (2010) 765–772.
[26] G. Shing, Ph.A. Shing, A.K. Sen, K. Shing, S.N. Dubey, R.N. Handa, J. Choi, Synth.
React. Inorg. Met. Org. Chem. 32 (2002) 171–187.