Communications
substrate 2b (524 mg, 2 mmol), and acetic acid (15 mL) was stirred in
[7] P. N. Rylander, Hydrogenation Methods, Academic Press, New
York, 1990.
an autoclave under a hydrogen atmosphere (100 bar) at 408C for 22 h.
The mixture was filtered through a short pad of Celite, which was
subsequently washed with MeOH (15 mL). Hydrochloric acid
[8] a) D. A. Evans, J. T. Shaw, Actual. Chim. 2003, 35; b) D. A.
Evans, A. S. Kim in Chiral Reagents for Asymmetric Synthesis
(Ed.: L. A. Paquette), Wiley, New York, 2003, p. 57; c) D. J.
Ager, I. Prakash, D. R. Schaad, Aldrichimica Acta 1997, 30, 3.
[9] It is generally accepted that the hydrogen atoms are transferred
to the face of the pyridinium ring that is adsorbed on the catalyst.
Stepwise hydrogenation may give rise to partially hydrogenated
species with different coordination modes. See: L. A. M. M.
Barbosa, P. Sautet, J. Catal. 2003, 217, 23.
(333 mL, 4.0 mmol) was added, and the solvent was removed by
rotary evaporation until no acetic acid was left. The ee value of 3b was
determined to be 95% by GC analysis of the N-trifluoroacetamide
derivative of the crude reaction product. The remaining white solid
was washed repeatedly with methyl tert-butyl ether/hexanes to yield
hydrochloride 3b (310 mg, 95%, 96% ee) as a white solid. Evapo-
ration of the organic phase left behind (S)-tBu-oxazolidinone
(
251 mg, 88%) as a white solid. All new compounds were fully
[10] In some cases the hydrogenation can be stopped at aminal 6, e.g.
in the case of 6g or 6j. An investigation of their synthetic utility
is ongoing and will be reported in due course.
characterized. The sources and types of catalysts used are given in the
Supporting Information.
[
11] The DFT calculations for 2g and 5g are supported by
comparable X-ray structures of 2c (CCDC-230262) and 5d/
Received: February 5, 2004 [Z53942]
BF (CCDC-230264), respectively.
4
[
12] The absolute stereochemistry of the products was determined
unequivocally by comparison of optical rotation data with
literature values (3a, 3b, 3d; N-Boc derivative of 3c), by X-
ray-analysis of 3i (CCDC-230263), 6g (CCDC-230265), 6j
Keywords: asymmetric synthesis · chiral auxiliaries ·
heterogeneous catalysis · hydrogenation · piperidines
.
(CCDC-230266), and
7
(CCDC-230267). CCDC 230262–
2
30267 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for
[
1] a) R. Noyori, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2108; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 2008; b) T. Ohkuma, M. Kitama, R. Noyori in
Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis (Ed.: I. Ojima), VCH, Wein-
heim, 2000, p. 1; c) Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis (Ed.:
E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz, H. Yamamoto), Springer, Berlin, 1999.
2] a) H.-U. Blaser, C. Malan, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, H. Steiner, M.
Studer, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 103; b) W. S. Knowles,
Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2096; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the Cam-
bridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cam-
bridge CB21EZ, UK; fax: (+ 44)1223-336-033; or deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
[
[
[
13] The reaction conditions are closely related to those developed by
Buchwald et al. for the amidation of aryl halides: A. Klapars, X.
Huang, S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7421. Our
general protocol (CuI, ligand, K CO , toluene, 1408C) varies in
1998.
2
3
3] Several criteria for efficiency and selectivity in chemical syn-
thesis have been defined. See for example: a) “Atom economy”:
B. M. Trost, Science 1991, 254, 1471; b) “The ideal synthesis”:
P. A. Wender, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1; c) “Economy of steps”: A.
Fürstner, Synlett 1999, 1523; d) “Atom efficiency”: R. A. Shel-
don, Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1233.
the choice of the optimal ligand: whereas less reactive substrates
benefited from the use of N,N’-dimethylethylendiamine, phe-
nanthroline proved to be superior for more reactive substrates.
[
[
[
14] Catalyst screening in AcOH, 100 bar H , 20 h (catalyst [%
2
conversion of substrate, % ee]): 5% Ru/C [15, n.d.], PtO [100,
8
C [100, 94], 10% Pd/C [100, 97], 20% Pd(OH) /C [100, 98]. In
2
5], 10% Pt/C [100, 85], 5% Rh/C [100, 86], 0.5% Rh/4.5% Pd/
[
4] The few reported highly enantioselective hydrogenations of
heteroaromatic compounds result in partial saturation of the
aromatic system and the creation of a single stereocenter: 2-
Methylquinoxaline to 2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxaline:
a) C. Bianchini, P. Barbaro, G. Scapacci, E. Farnetti, M.
Graziani, Organometallics 1998, 17, 3308; Indoles to indolines:
b) R. Kuwano, K. Sato, T. Kurokawa, D. Karube, Y. Ito, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7614; Quinolines to tetrahydroquinolines:
c) W.-B. Wang, S.-M. Lu, P.-Y. Yang, X.-W. Han, Y.-G. Zhou, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10536; For diastereoselective hydro-
genations of o-toluic acid derivatives, see: d) M. Besson, F.
Delbecq, P. Gallezot, S. Neto, C. Pinel, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 949.
5] Representative stereoselective hydrogenations of pyridines:
diastereoselective: a) H. Steiner, P. Giannousis, A. Pische-
Jacques, H.-U. Blaser, Top. Catal. 2000, 13, 191; b) A. SolladiØ-
Cavallo, C. Marsol, M. Yaakoub, K. Azyat, A. Klein, M. Roje, C.
Suteu, T. B. Freedman, X. Cao, L. A. Nafie, J. Org. Chem. 2003,
2
all cases the S enantiomer is formed predominantly.
15] Cleavage of a chiral auxiliary often leaves behind an undesired
functional group, whereas in this case, a C H bond is formed on
the parent molecule. The term “traceless cleavage” is usually
used in the context of traceless linkers: S. Brꢀse, S. Dahmen,
Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1899.
16] Whereas the reaction with acetaldehyde can be explained as a
reductive amination, the reaction with acetic anhydride is less
well understood since amides seem to be tolerated under the
reaction conditions (see Table 1, entry 6).
À
[
68, 7308; c) N. Douja, R. Malacea, M. Banciu, M. Besson, C.
Pinel, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6991; d) N. Douja, M. Besson,
P. Gallezot, C. Pinel, J. Mol. Catal. A 2002, 186, 145; e) L.
Hegedus, V. Hada, A. Tungler, T. Mathe, L. Szepesy, Appl. Catal.
A 2000, 201, 107 (the maximum de was corrected to 30%; see
ref. [5d]); enantioselective: f) H.-U. Blaser, H. Hönig, M. Studer,
C. Wedemeyer-Exl, J. Mol. Catal. A 1999, 139, 253; g) M. Studer,
C. Wedemeyer-Exl, F. Spindler, H.-U. Blaser, Monatsh. Chem.
2000, 131, 1335; h) S. A. Raynor, J. M. Thomas, R. Raja, B. F. G.
Johnson, R. G. Bell, M. D. Mantle, Chem. Commun. 2000, 1925.
6] For reviews, see: a) P. M. Weintraub, J. S. Sabol, J. M. Kane,
D. R. Borcherding, Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2953; b) S. Laschat, T.
Dickner, Synthesis 2000, 1781.
[
2
852
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2850 –2852