fluorescence quantum yield (φfl) of 0.85 with the absorption
maximum (Absmax) of 492 nm and the emission maximum
(Emmax) of 511 nm. Prerequisites for fluorescence labeling
reagents are to bear an intensely emitting fluorophore and a
reactive functional group to bind to the target molecule. From
these viewpoints, carboxyfluoresceins with fluorescence
properties similar to fluorescein are very useful as fluores-
cence labeling reagents and have indeed been widely utilized
for biological applications,10-15 although in most cases a
mixture of 5- and 6-carboxylate isomers is used due to the
difficulty of separation.16,17
Recently, we found that the emission intensity of car-
boxyfluoresceins declines markedly upon esterification of
the carboxyl functional groups. For example, t-butyl esteri-
fication of 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-CF) decreased the φfl
value from 0.915 to 0.378 at pH 7.4, and the corresponding
change for 5-carboxyfluorescein (5-CF) was from 0.834 to
0.694 (Figure 1). This suppression of fluorescence emission
of the φfl values (Figure 1). This hypothesis is also supported
by our previous findings on modulation of fluorescence
properties via the d-PeT process: the φfl value of tricar-
boxyfluorescein (0.817) is far higher than that of its trimethyl
ester derivative (0.001).21 We therefore aimed to design and
synthesize novel fluorescence labeling reagents in which the
d-PeT process is hampered and the emission intensity is
maintained even after labeling events.
The process of d-PeT involves transfer of one electron
from the excited xanthene unit to the lowest unoccupied
molecular orbital (LUMO) of the electron-deficient benzene
unit, leading to fluorescence quenching (Figure 2A). Thus,
Figure 2. Electron flow involved in d-PeT and molecular orbital
diagrams. (A) Fluorescence emission is quenched by d-PeT. (B)
Fluorescence emission is restored by preventing d-PeT.
elevation of the LUMO level by raising the electron density
of the benzene unit should prevent the d-PeT process and
result in a high quantum yield of the compound (Figure 2B).
The ease of electron transfer from the electron donor to
the acceptor is predicted by the Rehm-Weller equation21,22
and is correlated with the LUMO energy level.
Figure 1. Fluorescence quantum yields (φfl) and absorption/
emission maxima (nm) of carboxyfluoresceins and their t-butyl
esters in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).
The LUMO levels of the acceptor units of 6-CFtBu and
5-CFtBu, terephthalic acid mono t-butyl ester (1) and
isophthalic acid mono t-butyl ester (2), were obtained by
means of B3LYP/6-31G calculations. The small quantum
yields of 6-CFtBu and 5-CFtBu can be explained by the low
LUMO levels of their acceptor units 1 and 2, as shown in
Table 1, and this is also supported by our recent findings
regarding fluorescence quenching owing to the electron-
deficient benzene moiety of the acceptor unit.21 The LUMO
levels in Table 1 were calculated for the neutral forms, as
the electron deficiency of the benzoate derivatives of 6-CF
may be rationally explained by the occurrence of a donor-
excited photoinduced electron transfer (d-PeT) process from
the xanthene unit to the benzene unit18-20 because there is
no major shift in Absmax/Emmax accompanying the reduction
(7) Weber, G.; Teale, F. W. J. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1958, 54, 640-648.
(8) Jiao, G.-S.; Han, J. W.; Burgess, K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8264-
8267.
(9) Urano, Y.; Kamiya, M.; Kanda, K.; Ueno, T.; Hirose, K.; Nagano,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4888-4894.
(10) Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2029-2031.
(11) Paradiso, A. M.; Tsien, R. Y.; Machen, T. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1984, 81, 7436-7440.
(12) Souto, A. A.; Acun˜a, A. U.; Andreu, J. M.; Barasoain, I.; Abal,
M.; Amat-Guerri, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2710-2712.
(13) Setsukinai, K.; Urano, Y.; Kakinuma, K.; Majima, H. J. J. Biol.
Chem. 2003, 278, 3170-3175.
(14) Takakusa, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Urano, Y.; Sakamoto, S.; Yamaguchi,
K.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1653-1657.
(15) Kojima, H.; Nanatsubo, N.; Kikuchi, K.; Kawahara, S.; Kirino, Y.;
Nagoshi, H.; Hirata, Y.; Nagano, T. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2446-2453.
(16) Rossi, F. M.; Kao, J. P. Y. Bioconjugate Chem. 1997, 8, 495-497.
(17) Ueno, Y.; Guan-Sheng, J.; Kevin, B. Synthesis 2004, 2591-2593.
(18) Miura, T.; Urano, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Nagano, T.; Ohkubo, K.;
Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8666-8671.
(19) Kavarnos, G. J.; Turro, N. J. Chem. ReV. 1986, 86, 401-449.
(20) Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; Shen, T.; Li, Y.; Zhu, D. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2002, 106, 9597-9603.
(21) Ueno, T.; Urano, Y.; Setsukinai, K.; Takakusa, H.; Kojima, H.;
Kikuchi, K.; Ohkubo, K.; Fukuzumi, S.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 14079-14085.
(22) Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Isr. J. Chem. 1970, 8, 259-271.
5964
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 26, 2006