P. Huang, X. Peng, G. Qiu et al.
Tetrahedron 83 (2021) 131964
quinoline N-oxide (1a) with TMSCN as a model reaction. After
extensive experimentation, the desired product 2a was obtained in
25% yield when 50 wt % of GO was selected as a catalyst in dioxane
at 100 ꢀC for 8 h (Table 1, entry 1). It is important that the NeO bond
cleavage is not occurring. To avoid producing hazardous HCN gas,
replacing TMSCN with NH4SCN, CH3CN, 2-phenylacetonitrile, 2,3-
Dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ), azobisisobutyr-
benzoyl cyanide. As shown in Table 2, a wide range of quinoline N-
oxides, including chloro, bromo, methyl, methoxy and nitro, can be
employed as effective coupling partners. Generally, the introduc-
tion of electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups at the C-
5, -6, -7, or -8 position of the quinoline N-oxides all proceeded with
the smooth coupling with benzoyl cyanide, affording the corre-
sponding products in moderate to excellent yields and with good
regioselectivity. Particularly compelling is the cyanation of 5-
(phenylethynyl)quinolone N-oxide (2o), which proceeded in good
yield despite the presence of an alkyne group. The structure of 2b
was confirmed by X-ray analysis (see the Supporting Information
for more details).
This methodology also proved applicable to isoquinoline N-ox-
ides (2p-2s), which could proceed efficiently and afford the corre-
sponding products in moderate to excellent yields and with good
regioselectivity. Unfortunately, 1t and 1u were not converted into
their target products.
onitrile
(AIBN)
or
N-cyano-N-phenyl-p-methyl-
benzenesulfonamide (NCTS) resulted in no reaction (Table 1, entries
2e6). However, the cyanation product 2a was isolated in 56% yield
by using benzoyl cyanide as a “CN” source (Table 1, entry 7). With
the encouraging preliminary result, different solvents such as
toluene, H2O, EtOH, DMF, and DMSO, were investigated (Table 1,
entries 8e12), and DMSO gave the best result with 89% yield
(Table 1, entry 12). We also tried this reaction using graphite or
graphene instead of GO. The results showed that graphite and
graphene were inefficient (Table 1, entries 13 and 14).
As expected, the control experiments clearly showed that GO is
essential for this reaction, as no cyanation product was observed in
the absence of the GO catalyst (Table 1, entry 15). Subsequent ef-
forts were directed toward optimizing the GO loadings (Table 1,
entries 16 and 17). By lowering the catalyst loading to 40 wt %, it
was observed that product could be isolated in 71% yield. However,
further lowering catalyst loading to 30 wt % made the reaction
become sluggish, which resulted in product 2a in 33% yield along
with 60% recovered starting material. The investigation on the ef-
fect of the reaction temperature proved that 100 ꢀC was appropriate
for this reaction (Table 1, entries 18 and 19). Finally, the best result
was obtained by using GO (50 wt %) in DMSO at 100 ꢀC for 8 h under
air atmosphere.
In addition, the cyanations of other heteroarene N-oxides, such
as 2,2-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole 1-oxide 4, with benzoyl
GO as a carbocatalytic material could be easily scaled up because
of its low-cost and abundantly available. In order to demonstrate
the effectiveness of this new strategy, a gram scale reaction was
performed under the standard conditions. 10 mmol 1a and
15 mmol benzoyl cyanide were subjected to the reaction in the
presence of GO (726 mg, 50 wt %) in 20 mL DMSO 100 ꢀC under air
atmosphere. After 8 h, the desired product 2a was obtained in 85%
yield, which demonstrated the practical application of this protocol
to prepare 2-cyanoquinoline 1-oxides on a gram-scale (Scheme 3).
As we all know, one-pot synthesis can simplify a lot of pro-
cessing procedure and reduce the loss of material compared to
multi-step reactions. We envisaged that the cyanation of quinoline
N-oxide could be realized in “one-pot” by starting with quinoline as
substrate. We initiated our studies with quinoline as substrate and
After establishment of the optimal reaction conditions, we
evaluated the generality of the GO- catalyzed cyanation, and the
results are summarized in Table 2. We first examined the scope of
differentially substituted quinoline N-oxides in the cyanation with
Table 1
Screening of the reaction conditionsa.
Entry
yano source
Solvent
T (oC)
Time (h)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
GO (50)
Graphite (50)
Graphene (50)
e
TMSCN (3 equiv)
CH3CN(3 equiv)
PhCH2CN(3 equiv)
DDQ (3 equiv)
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
toluene
H2O
EtOH
DMF
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
90
8
25
0
0
0
0
24
24
24
24
24
8
8
8
8
8
AIBN (3 equiv)
NCTS (3 equiv)
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
benzoyl cyanide
0
56
28
N.R.
N.R.
N.R.
89
N.R.
N.R.
N.R.
71
33
80
83
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
8
24
24
24
8
24
8
GO (40)
GO (30)
GO (50)
GO (50)
110
8
a
Reaction conditions: A mixture of 1a (0.3 mmol) and benzoyl cyanide (1.5 equiv) in solvent (1 mL) was placed in an oil bath under air atmosphere.
With respect to the substrate 1a.
Isolated yield after purification by column chromatography.
b
c
3