few of them are used in neat aqueous solution.7f Conse-
quently, the development of nake-eyed sensors for Cu2+ in
neat aqueous solution has the important feature that they can
be used to evaluate the analyte concentration rapidly.
The conversion of spiropyran to merocyanine8 was used
for metal ion sensing by phenolate oxygen in the merocya-
nine via cooperative ligation of other chelating functionality
attached at the 8-position or N-position (Scheme 1).6a,7g,9
However, the use of organic solvents and light-black
protection in the measurement limits their application.
Therefore, thermo-/photostable merocyanine from spiropyran
is desirable. Herein, we introduce naphthalen-1,8-diol moiety
into spiropyran 1a, which is likely to convert to merocyanine
our design. Compound 1 can be obtained by condensation
of 1,8-dihydroxy-2-naphthaldehyde 9 with 1,2,3,3-tetram-
ethyl-3H-indolium iodide in ethanol (shown in Scheme 2).8
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 1 and 2
Scheme 1. Chemical Structure of the Spironaphthanopyran 1
and the Interconversion of Spiropyran to Merocyanine
Compound 9 was obtained in three steps starting from com-
mercially available naphthalen-1,8-diol 3.11 In the same pro-
cedure, compound 2, without an additional chelating hydroxyl
group, was also synthesized in control. The detailed experi-
mental procedures can be found in the Supporting Information.
Compound 1 exists mainly as merocyanine in solution.
In its 1H NMR spectrum in CDCl3, a singlet at 14.58 ppm is
assigned to the proton of the hydroxyl group involved in a
strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding; two doublets (6.18
and 8.66 ppm) with a coupling constant of 14.2 Hz are
assigned to the protons of trans-CHdCH bond and a singlet
at 3.48 ppm is assigned to the proton of N-CH3. In contrast,
compound 2 exists as the spiro-form in chloroform due to
chemical shifts at 2.73 ppm for N-CH3 and a coupling
constant of 10.2 Hz for cis-CHdCH. The results demonstrate
the intramolecular hydrogen bonding in molecule 1 makes
the equilibrium shift to merocyanine and stabilizes the
merocyanine. About 20% intramolecular proton tranfer
tautormer existing in CDCl3 and CD3CN vanished when
CD3OD and DMSO-d6 were used as solvent (Figure 1).
When an equivalent of Cu(OAc)2 was added to a solution
of 1 in DMSO-d6, the naphtholate together with hydroxy
group bind to Cu2+, which results in the peaks broadening
1b due to the formation of a six-membered-ring intramo-
lecular hydrogen bond between hydroxyl group and carbonyl
(or naphthanolate) group (Scheme 1). The formed hydrogen
bonding will stabilize the zwitterion form 1c and increase
its solubility in polar solvent. Furthermore, the hydroxyl
group together with naphthanolate could bind to the metal
ion and act as a sensor. In this context, we present the
synthesis and the spectroscopic evaluation of colorimetric
chemosensor 1, which is developed for the highly selective
visual detection of Cu2+ in aqueous buffer solution.
Theoretical calculations are performed to evaluate the sum
of electronic and zero-point energies of spiro-form 1a and
mero-form 1b on the isolated gas phase by using the
Gaussian 03 program (b3lyp/6-31+G(d,p)).10 The result
shows the energy of mero-form 1b is 18.4 kcal/mol lower
than that of spiro-form 1a. This demonstrates 1 exists mainly
in mero-form 1b in the equilibrium and is in accordance with
1
and shifting in the H NMR spectrum.
The intramolecular hydrogen bond-stabilized merocyanine
exhibits a strong absorption band in the range of 500-650
nm in selected solvents. (Figure 2). The absorption maxi-
mium of 1 in methanol appears at 603 nm with a extinction
coefficient (ε) of 7.4 × 104 M-1 cm-1, which is assigned to
the transition to the intramolecular charge transfer state from
(7) Recent references: (a) Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X. B.; Han, Z. X.; Qiao, L.;
Li, C. Y.; Jian, L. X.; Shen, G. L.; Yu, R. Q. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 7022.
(b) Huang, J.; Xu, Y.; Qian, X. Dalton. Trans. 2009, 1761. (c) Chen, X. Q.;
Jou, M. J.; Lee, H.; Kou, S. Z.; Lim, J.; Nam, S. W.; Park, S.; Kim, K. M.;
Yoon, J. Sens. Actuators, B 2009, 137, 597. (d) Rodriguez-Morgade, M. S.;
Planells, M.; Torres, T.; Ballester, P.; Palomares, E. J. Mater. Chem. 2008,
18, 176. (e) Martinez, R.; Zapata, F.; Caballero, A.; Espinosa, A.; Tarraga,
A.; Molina, P. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3235. (f) Gunnlaugsson, T.; Leonard,
J. P.; Murray, N. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1557. (g) Shao, N.; Jin, J. Y.; Wang,
H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, R. H.; Chan, W. H. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 3466. (h)
Moletti, A.; Coluccini, C.; Pasini, D.; Taglietti, A. Dalton. Trans. 2007,
1588. (i) Sheng, R. L.; Wang, P. F.; Gao, Y. H.; Wu, Y.; Liu, W. M.; Ma,
J. J.; Li, H. P.; Wu, S. K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5015. (j) Xiang, Y.; Li, M.;
Chen, X. T.; Tong, A. J. Talanta 2008, 74, 1148. (k) Mashraqui, S. H.;
Khan, T.; Sundaram, S.; Ghadigaonkar, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3739.
(l) Kim, M. H.; Noh, J. H.; Kim, S.; Ahn, S.; Chang, S. K. Dyes Pigm.
2009, 82, 341.
(9) (a) Phillips, J.; Mueller, A.; Przystal, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965,
87, 4020. (b) Taylor, L. D.; Nicholson, J.; Davis, R. B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1967, 8, 1585. (c) Chibisov, A. K.; Gorner, H. Chem. Phys. 1998, 237,
425. (d) Winkler, J. D.; Bowen, C. M.; Michelet, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 3237. (e) Collins, G. E.; Choi, L. S.; Ewing, K. J.; Michelet,
V.; Bowen, C. M.; Winkler, J. D. Chem. Commun. 1999, 321. (f) Nishikiori,
H.; Sasai, R.; Arai, N.; Arai, N.; Takagi, K. Chem. Lett. 2000, 1142. (g)
Wojtyk, J. T. C.; Kazmaier, P. M.; Buncel, E. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13,
2547. (h) Leaustic, A.; Dupont, A.; Yu, P.; Clement, R. New J. Chem. 2001,
25, 1297. (i) Kopelman, R. A.; Snyder, S. M.; Frank, N. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 13684.
(10) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, Revision E.01; Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford, CT, 2004.
(11) (a) Glaser, T.; Liratzis, I.; Frohlich, R. Dalton Trans. 2005, 2892.
(b) Glaser, T.; Liratzis, I. Synlett 2004, 735.
(8) Minkin, V. I. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2751.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2203