43
This type of rapid donor–donor transfer was described by Huber
References
[21,22]. Characteristic feature for such transfer is well manifested
in decay profile, which at its beginning is multiexponential and at
its end become single exponential (see Fig. 6).
[1] C.N. Rao, A. Muller, A.K. Cheetman, The Chemistry of Nanomaterials, Wiley-VCH
Verlag, 2004, pp. 3–4.
[2] K.E. Sickafus, J.M. Will, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82 (1999) 3279.
[3] H.K. Muller-Buschbaum, J. Alloys Compd. 349 (2003) 49–104.
[4] J. Omkaram, G. Seeta Rama, S. Raju, S. Buddhudu, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69 (2008)
2066–2069.
[5] R.J. Wiglusz, T. Grzyb, S. Lis, W. Stre˛k, J. Lumin. 130 (2010) 434–441.
[6] J.G. Li, T. Ikegami, J-H. Lee, T. Mori, Y. Yajima, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 21 (2001)
139–148.
[7] E.N. Alvar, M. Rezaei, H.N. Alvar, Powder Technol. 198 (2010) 275–278.
[8] P.J. Deren, M. Malinowski, W. Strek, J. Lumin. 68 (1996) 91–103.
[9] P.J. Deren´ , W. Stre˛k, U. Oetliker, H.U. Güdel, Phys. Status Solid. 182 (1994)
241–251.
With increasing of Nd3+ concentration the number of Nd3+–Nd3+
pairs increases. The cross-relaxation XCR rate was calculated using
the below equation [23]:
1
ꢄ
1
ꢄ0
XCR
=
−
(4)
where ꢄ is the luminescence decay time, ꢄ0 lifetime measured for
the sample with the lowest neodymium concentration. The slope of
CR transfer rate is close to 2 (see Fig. 8). Stronger, n = 2, 3 CR rate is
observed at room temperature, because cross-relaxation is phonon
assisted and therefore more effective.
[10] L.E. Bausá, I. Vergara, J. García-Solé, W. Strek, P.J. Deren´ , J. Appl. Phys. 68 (1990)
736–740.
[11] R.J. Wiglusz, T. Grzyb, Opt. Mater. 33 (2011) 1506–1513.
[12] M.P. Pechini, US Patent 3330 (1967) 697.
[13] P. Scherrer, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 2 (1918) 96–100.
[14] M.A. Małecka, U. Burkhardt, D. Kaczorowski, M.P. Schmidt, D. Goran, L. Ke˛pin´ ski,
J. Nanopart. Res. 11 (2009) 2113.
4. Conclusion
[15] A.A. Kaminskii, Crystalline Lasers: Physical Processes and Operating Schemes,
CRC Press, New York, 1996, pp. 235–238.
[16] B.R. Judd, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 750.
[17] G.S. Ofelt, J. Chem. Phys. 37 (1962) 511.
[18] I. García-Rubio, J.A. Pardo, R.I. Merino, R. Cases, V.M. Orera, J. Lumin. 86 (2000)
Synthesis of MgAl2O4 nanocrystallites doped with different
Nd3+ concentration in the range 0.1–5% was developed. Nanocrys-
tallites were pure-phase magnesium spinel. The nanocrystallites
mean size decreases from 12 to 7 nm with increasing Nd3+ concen-
147–153.
[19] P.J. Deren´ , A. Bednarkiewicz, Ph. Goldner, O. Guillot-Noel, J. Appl. Phys. 103
(2008), 043102.
[20] K. Leman´ ski, A. Ga˛gor, M. Kurnatowska, R. Pa˛zik, P.J. Deren´ , J. Solid State Chem.
184 (2011) 2713–2718.
[21] D.L. Huber, in: W.M. Yen, R.M. Selzer (Eds.), Laser Spectroscopy of Solids,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981, pp. 83–111.
[22] D.L. Huber, Phys. Rev. B 20 (1979) 2307–2314.
[23] M. Malinowski, M. Kaczkan, S. Turczyn´ ski, D. Pawlak, Opt. Mater. 33 (2011)
1004–1007.
4
tration from 0.1 to 5%, respectively. For all samples the 4F3/2 → I9/2
transition is the most intense in the emission spectra. It is well
correlated with spectroscopic quality factor equal to 3.3, which
remains the same in the Nd3+ concentration range equal to 0.1–5%.
It indicates that dopant do not changes host properties up to 5%.
Emission intensity as well as decay times of higher doped samples
are affected by cross-relaxation processes which are very effective.
Acknowledgment
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science
and Higher Education under Grant no. N N507 372335, which is
greatly acknowledged.