Organic Process Research & Development 2005, 9, 516−518
Technical Notes
Energy Efficiency in Chemical Reactions: A Comparative Study of Different
Reaction Techniques
Mark J. Gronnow, Robin J. White, James H. Clark,* and Duncan J. Macquarrie
Clean Technology Centre, Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
Scheme 1. Suzuki coupling of phenyl boronic acid and
bromotoluene
Abstract:
Metrics for chemists are much argued, but the energy usage of
a reaction has to be one of the most simple and effective methods
of comparing technologies. In this concept paper, the energy
consumed in preparing one mole of a chemical compound is
compared for a variety of technologies. Data are gathered for
traditional oil bath, supercritical CO2 (sc-CO2), and microwave
reactors. Two different Suzuki couplings, a Knoevenagel
condensation, and a Friedel-Crafts acylation are all compared
in both the microwave and oil bath, as this is where the most
noticeable differences were observed. The most notable result
was an 85-fold reduction in energy demand on switching from
oil bath to microwave reactor for a Suzuki reaction.
supply and reactor to measure the energy consumed during
the course of the reaction. To normalise the data the energy
has been calculated on the basis of moles of product formed.
The experimental methods are shown in the footnotes.
Assumptions are made to maintain the simple nature of the
calculations, and no chemical or gas formation costs are
included. As product mixtures were similar, the energy
consumed in a work-up is not included as it would be
identical for all crude mixtures (e.g., column then evaporation
of solvent).
Introduction
The subject of metrics is becoming increasingly important
in green chemistry. Numerous papers have been published
concerning the measurement of “greenness” within reac-
tions,1 however the majority of these seem to be only
concerned with the efficiency of the chemistry of the reaction.
Life cycle assessment teaches us that energy consumption
should also be considered since it consumes (mainly
nonrenewable) resources and produces waste. Escalating
energy costs have also made energy efficiency an equally
important metric in determining environmental acceptability
and economic viability. Microwave-assisted chemical reac-
tions have frequently been reported to show increased
product yield, increased selectivity, and extremely short
reaction times often in the absence of solvent.2 These would
appear to indicate good metrics, but the energy efficiency
of such processes is not clear and rarely discussed. In an
attempt to encourage the regular use of energy efficiency in
process metrics we have compared the use of three different
currently popular reaction techniques to carry out important
organic reactions.
The homogeneous palladium-catalysed Suzuki coupling
is currently a very popular reaction with the pharmaceutical
and specialty chemical industries; in this example phenyl
boronic acid and 4-bromotoluene are coupled to form the
biaryl (Scheme 1). These reaction conditions4 were selected
as they are proven to work under both sc-CO2 and conven-
tional solvent conditions. Further reactions were studied with
attempts made to cover a range of different chemistries. The
second Suzuki coupling was selected as it is a traditionally
low-yielding chloro-coupling which has been found to have
excellent yields in a microwave reactor. The aluminium
chloride catalysed Friedel-Crafts acetylation has been
studied as an example of chemistry carried out below the
“bubble point”. A Knoevenagel reaction was studied as an
example of a base-catalysed reaction; furthermore, this
methodology involved using a heterogeneous catalyst which
the chemical industry is beginning to investigate as an
alternative to homogeneous catalyst as it is simple to remove
and recycle.
A system has been devised using a domestic six-dial
electricity meter in series between the laboratory power
Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows the results obtained for the Suzuki coupling
reactions between phenyl boronic acid and bromobenzene
carried out under the different reaction conditions.
Telephone: +441904432559.
(1) For a review, see: Constable, D. J. C.; Curzons, A. D.; Freitas dos Santos,
L. M.; Geen, G. R.; Hannah, R. E.; Hayler, J. D.; Kitteringham, J.; McGuire,
M. A.; Richardson, J. E.; Smith, P.; Webb, R. L.; Yu, M. Green Chem.
2001, 3, 7-9.
(3) Oakes, R. S.; Clifford, A. A.; Rayner, C. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 2001, 917.
(4) Raynel, G.; Rayner, C. M. First Year Progress Report; University Of Leeds,
(2) Leadbeater, N. Chem. World 2004, 38.
2002.
516
•
Vol. 9, No. 4, 2005 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op0498060 CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/24/2005