ꢀ
generation of the nucleophilic [Co(CO) ] ion. In order to
4
test our hypothesis, we examined metal halides of varying
Lewis acidity in the carbonylation of cyclooctene oxide.
a
Table 1. Screening of Lewis Acidic Metal Halides
b
L
n
MX
n
Co
2
(CO)
8
P(CO)
(psi)
conv
(%)
entry
L
n
MX
n
(mol %)
(mol %)
Figure 1. Coates’ catalysts for epoxide carbonylation.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ꢀ
ꢀ
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
900
500
400
100
500
0
AlCl
ZnCl
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0
IR studies, the in situ generated cobaltate salt [Me Al-
2
0
þ
ꢀ
9
2
(
diglyme)] [Co(CO) ] was identified as the active catalyst.
4
ZrCl
Cp TiCl
( PrO) TiCl
4
0
Most of the catalytic systems described above show high
2
2
trace
trace
24
i
activity for terminal epoxides; however, only salts 1 and 2
display high activity with 1,2-disubstituted meso-epoxides.
Catalysts 1 and 2 are air sensitive and require the use of
glovebox and Schlenk-line techniques for their synthesis
and handling, which impedes their general use within
nonspecialized laboratories.
We report here on a catalytic system comprised of
commercially available components that circumvents the
preparation and handling of air sensitive cobaltate salts.
Moreover, it displays activities similar or higher than the
best catalysts describedtodate for both meso- and terminal
epoxides.
2
2
TiBr
4
(TPP)CrCl
(TPP)AlCl
(TPP)FeCl
(TPP)CoCl
(TPP)CrCl
(TPP)CrCl
(TPP)CrCl
(TPP)CrCl
(TPP)CrCl
g98
18
1
0
trace
0
11
1
2
3
g98
g98
91
1
14
15
59
1
6
22
a
Reaction conditions: epoxide (2 mmol), THF (3 mL, 0.67 M).
Determined by H NMR spectroscopy of the crude material.
b
1
It is well-documented that Lewis bases (LBs) dispropor-
tionate Co (CO) to form homonuclear ion pairs
2
8
For initial catalyst screening we employed 1 mol % of a
metal halide and equimolar amounts of Co (CO) under
1
0
(
by halide sources has been the subject of a relatively few
HNIPs). However, the disproportionation of Co (CO)8
2
2
8
900 psi of CO pressure, with reactions run at 70 °C and a
1
1
publications. Inparticular, a report by Braterman caught
our attention, where it was shown that free or complexed
halide sources could catalyze the disproportionation of
reaction time of 16 h. A control experiment with 5 mol %
of Co (CO) failed to give any product (Table 1, entry 1).
2
8
AlCl , ZnCl , and ZrCl asprecatalystsgaveno conversion
3
ꢀ
11a
2
4
Co (CO) to generate the nucleophilic [Co(CO) ] ion.
8
i
2
4
(
entries 2ꢀ4), while Cp TiCl and ( PrO) TiCl gave only
2
2
2
2
Our group is interested in utilizing Lewis acidic metal
halides as multifunctional reagents, for instance, simulta-
traces of the product (entries 5 and 6). We were pleased to
find that TiBr gave a 24% conversion to the product
1
2
4
neously as an LA and a halide source. We hypothesized
that the use of a Lewis acidic metal halide in conjunction
with Co (CO) could form in situ a catalyst that would
confirming our hypothesis that anin situ generated catalyst
from a Lewis acidic metal halide can catalyze the carbo-
nylation of epoxides (entry 7). We examined (TPP)CrCl
next, which has been reported to form the strongly Lewis
2
8
combine LA activation of the epoxide with halide-assisted
þ
13
acidic [(TPP)Cr(L)2] ion in the presence of epoxides,
(
9) (a) Molnar, F.; Luinstra, G. A.; Allmendinger, M.; Rieger, B.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1273–1280. (b) Allmendinger, M.; Eberhardt,
R.; Luinstra, G. A.; Molnar, F.; Rieger, B. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2003,
and were delighted to find that cyclooctene oxide was
completely converted to the β-lactone (entry 8). In com-
parison, (TPP)AlCl gave a conversion of 18%, whereas
(TPP)FeCl produced only traces of the product, with
629, 1347–1352.
(
10) (a) Sisak, A.; Ungv ꢀa ry, F.; Mark oꢀ , L. Organometallics 1983, 2,
1
2
1
244–1246. (b) Sisak, A.; Mark oꢀ , L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987, 330,
01–206. (c) Fachinetti, G.; Fochi, G.; Funaioli, T. J. Organomet. Chem.
986, 301, 91–97. (d) Tasi, M.; Sisak, A.; Ungv ꢀa ry, F.; P ꢀa lyi, G.
(
TPP)CoCl being inactive (entries 9ꢀ11). These findings
Monatsh. Chem. 1985, 116, 1103–1105. (e) Absi-Halabi, M.; Atwood,
J. D; Forbus, N. P.; Brown, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6248–
are in agreement with Coates’ work and underline the
Sub-
8b,c
uniqueness of the chromium porphyrin systems.
6254.
(
sequent reaction parameter optimization using (TPP)CrCl
showed that lowering the (TPP)CrCl and Co (CO) load-
ing to 0.5 mol % (entry 12) and the CO pressure to 500 psi
11) (a) Braterman, P. S.; Walker, B. S.; Robertson, T. H. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 651–652. (b) Fachinetti, G.; Funaioli, T.;
Marcucci, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 353, 393–404. (c) Braterman,
P. S.; Leslie, A. E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1981, 214, C45–C49.
2
8
(12) (a) Akula, R.; Galligan, M. J.; Ibrahim, H. Chem. Commun.
2
2
009, 6991–6993. (b) Akula, R.; Galligan, M. J.; Ibrahim, H. Synthesis
011, 347–351.
(13) Chen, P.; Malcolm, H. C.; Gallucci, J. C.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Z.
Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2588–2595.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 12, 2011
3143