of potassium carbonate and DMF provided 9, which was
isolated as a crystalline solid from EtOAc. The alcohol was
activated by conversion to triflate 10 using standard condi-
This was added to a solution of coupling partners 3, 11,
diisopropylethylamine, and NMP. The tertiary amine was
required to maintain basic conditions during the reaction.
Decomposition was observed when the mixture was allowed
to become acidic during the course of this cross-coupling.
After 3 h at 60 °C, the assay yield was 98% (HPLC).13
2
tions. When 10 was treated with 6 at ambient temperature
in acetonitrile, 11 was produced in high yield. This compound
was isolated as an amorphous ditriflate salt by precipitation
with ether.
A workup procedure was devised that allowed the
quantitative recovery of the stannatrane as chloride 7 as well
as the isolation of 12 as a crystalline solid in high yield.
The transmetalation step of the Stille coupling catalytic cycle
returns the stannatrane as its triflate. This compound was
converted to chloride 7 by diluting the crude reaction mixture
with THF and washing with 20% aqueous NaCl. A solvent
switch from THF to acetonitrile provided a slurry which,
when filtered, gave 61% of the stannatrane as crystalline 7
and a clear mother liquor. When 2-propanol was added
dropwise to this mother liquor, 12 crystallized and was
isolated in 98% yield by filtration. This mother liquor was
concentrated to dryness and the residue triturated with
methanol to return the remaining 39% of stannatrane chloride
Alternatively 11 could be prepared as a different salt form
by simply changing the order of reactions. First combining
the triflate of 5 with 6, followed by coupling with 8, provided
11 as the monoiodide monotriflate salt.
With the coupling partners 3 and 11 in hand, the key cross-
coupling reaction was explored (Scheme 3). The use of
Scheme 3. Coupling and Deprotection Sequence
7
.
To complete the preparation of drug candidate 1, all that
remained was the removal of the triethylsilyl and 4-nitroben-
zyl blocking groups from 12. This was accomplished using
a procedure that avoided any intermediate isolation. Treat-
ment of 12 with 0.06 M HCl removed the triethylsilyl moiety.
The pH was then adjusted to 7.0 using a 4-morpholinepro-
panesulfonic acid/NaOH buffer system. The mixture was
hydrogenated at 40 psi using 5% Pd/C as catalyst to remove
the 4-nitrobenzyl group. Carbapenem 1 was isolated in pure
form as the chloride salt using Amberchrome CG-161m resin
followed by lyophilization.
With this work we have demonstrated a brief and efficient
route to 1 that highlights the versatility of the stannatrane in
palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. The stan-
natrane was quantitatively recovered leaving residual tin in
HMPA as solvent or cosolvent with DMPU, which was
3
3 2
required for the cross-coupling of 3 with Bu SnCH OH, is
not needed in this case. In fact, NMP was found to give
superior yields. When the cross-coupling was attempted
between the monoiodide monotriflate salt of 11 and 3, no
reaction occurred. The technique of adding silver triflate or
silver nitrate to the reaction mixture to sequester the halide
also failed. The reaction of 3 with the ditriflate salt 11,
however, performed well.
(
12) Farina, V.; Krishnan, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9585.
(13) A suspension of Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 (31.6 mg, 0.031 mmol), tri-2-
furylphosphine (35.4 mg, 0.153 mmol), and NMP (2 mL) was degassed
and then warmed to 60 °C for 30 min. The catalyst solution was added to
a degassed solution of 3 (743 mg, 1.22 mmol), 11 (972 mg, 1.00 mmol),
diisopropylethylamine (47 mg, 0.37 mmol), and NMP (10 mL) at 60 °C.
The mixture was stirred for 3 h at 60 °C (98% assay yield). The crude
reaction was diluted with THF (50 mL) and washed with 20% aqueous
NaCl (3 × 50 mL). The THF was removed in vacuo, and the residue was
diluted with acetonitrile (5 mL). The resulting crystalline solids (7, 179
mg, 0.61 mmol) were collected on a frit. 2-Propanol (20 mL) was added
dropwise to the mother liquor, and the resulting crystalline solid was
collected by filtration to provide 12 (1.243 g) as a crystalline solid. The
mother liquor was concentrated to dryness and then triturated with methanol
The preferred catalyst was prepared by the combination
12
of Pd
2
(dba)
3
3
‚CHCl and tri-2-furylphosphine in warm NMP.
1
2
.94 g, 10.0 mmol) was added in one portion and the resulting suspension
(2 mL) to provide the remaining 7 (116 mg, 0.39 mmol). 12: H NMR
was stirred at 0 °C for 3 h and then rt for 0.5 h. The solution was poured
onto heptanes (100 mL) and water (33 mL) and then 2 M aqueous HCl (18
mL) was added (pH now 2.5); both phases were clear. The layers were
partitioned, and the organic phase was washed with water (2 × 30 mL)
and then brine (30 mL) and dried (MgSO4). The solvent was removed in
vacuo to provide 8 (3.98 g, 100%) as colorless crystals. An analytical
(CD3CN, 250 MHz) δ 8.19 (dt, J ) 8.8, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J ) 7.5 Hz,
1H), 7.80 (d, J ) 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (dt, J ) 8.8, 1.9 Hz, 2H), 7.76-7.57
(m, 2H), 6.94 (bs, 1H), 6.87 (dd, J ) 6.0, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (bs, 1H), 5.52
(d, J ) 13.9 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (d, J ) 13.9 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (d, J ) 17.0 Hz,
1H), 4.68 (d, J ) 17.0 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (m, 1H), 4.27 (s, 2H), 4.23 (m, 1H),
4.21 (m, 6H), 4.17 (m, 6H), 3.82 (m, 2H), 3.63 (m, 2H), 3.39 (m, 1H),
3.34 (m, 1H), 1.23 (d, J ) 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (d, J ) 6.2 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (t,
J ) 8.0 Hz, 9H), 0.56 (q, J ) 8.0 Hz, 6H); C NMR (CD3CN, 62.9 MHz)
δ 175.9, 164.9, 162.0, 148.7, 147.2, 144.2, 138.2, 138.1, 131.3, 130.5, 130.4,
130.3, 130.1, 129.4, 124.5, 122.0 (q, J ) 320 Hz), 121.0, 120.1, 116.3,
105.6, 66.5, 66.1, 65.0, 63.0, 61.2, 56.0, 52.9, 52.1, 41.5, 39.1, 25.4, 22.3,
15.9, 7.1, 5.5. Anal. Calcd for C46H58N6O15F6S3Si‚0.5IPA: C, 47.41; H,
5.19; F, 9.47; N, 6.98. Found: C, 47.20; H, 5.30; F, 9.16; N, 6.69.
1
standard was prepared by recrystallization from methanol: mp 40-55 °C; H
13
NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz) δ 2.37 (m, 6H), 1.67 (m, 6H), 1.66 (s, 2H), 0.82,
1
3
(
m, 6H); C NMR (CDCl3, 62.9 MHz) δ 54.6, 23.3, 7.2, -13.5. Anal.
Calcd for C10H20INSn: C, 30.04; H, 5.04; I, 31.75; N, 3.50. Found: C,
0.20; H, 4.88; I, 31.45; N, 3.41.
11) Miller, R. A.; Humphrey, G. R.; Lieberman, D. R.; Ceglia, S. S.;
3
(
Grabowski, E. J. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1399.
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 8, 2000
1083