11498
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11498-11499
Table 1. Effect of Reaction Parameters on the Coupling of CO2
and PO Catalyzed by Complexes 1a-da
Chemical CO2 Fixation: Cr(III) Salen Complexes as
Highly Efficient Catalysts for the Coupling of CO2
and Epoxides
Robert L. Paddock and SonBinh T. Nguyen*
Department of Chemistry and Institute for
EnVironmental Catalysis, Northwestern UniVersity
2145 Sheridan Road, EVanston, Illinois 60208-3113
DMAP
equiv
CO2
(psig) (°C)
temp time
total
TONb (h-1
)
TOFd
entry catalyst
(h)
1
2
3
4
5c
6
7
8
9
la
lb
lc
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0.5
1
2
4
1
1
100
100
100
100
100
150
150
150
150
150
150
100
100
100
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
25
50
100
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
14
7
1
323
338
253
507
386
0
162
169
127
254
193
0
ReceiVed June 21, 2001
Carbon dioxide is an attractive C1 building block in organic
synthesis as it is highly functional, abundant, inexpensive,
nontoxic, and nonflammable. As petroleum reserves are depleted,
the development of efficient catalytic processes employing CO2
as a feedstock has become increasingly important as evidenced
by the intense research in this area in recent years.1-3 However,
due to the inert nature of CO2, efficient catalytic processes for
chemical fixation remain elusive. Thus, in addition to the practical
merit, chemical CO2 fixation remains a significant synthetic
challenge.
1d
1d
none
1d
1d
1d
1d
1d
1d
1d
1d
0
0
302
340
458
30
151
170
229
15
10
11
12
13
14
39
3
179
916
26
916
1
One of the most promising methodologies in this area has been
the synthesis of cyclic carbonates via the metal-catalyzed coupling
of CO2 and epoxides (eq 1).4 Cyclic carbonates are valuable as
monomers, aprotic polar solvents, pharmaceutical/fine chemical
intermediates, and in many biomedical applications.5,6 In recent
decades numerous catalyst systems have been developed for this
transformation.4,7-11 While the advances have been significant,
all suffer from either low catalyst stability/reactivity, air sensitiv-
ity, the need for co-solvent, or the requirement for high pressures
and/or high temperatures. For example, a recently reported catalyst
system is a mixed-metal Mg/Al oxide which operates at a
reasonable CO2 pressure (5 atm) but requires a substantial amount
of solvent (85% v/v DMF) and takes 24 h at 100 °C to convert
just 0.28 g of propylene oxide in 88% yield and 92% selectivity,
even with a very high catalyst loading of 1.8 g catalyst/ g of
substrate.12
a Reaction Conditions: PO (4 mL, 3.32 g, 5.72 × 10-2 mol), CH2C12
(0.5 mL), catalyst (0.075 mol %). b Moles of propylene carbonate
produced per mole of catalyst. c Reaction carried out in neat PO (4
mL). d Moles of propylene carbonate produced per mole of catalyst
per hour.
Cr(III) porphyrin complex as a catalyst for this reaction.13,14
Changing the coordination environment around the Cr metal
center from a porphyrin to a salen15 ligand offers several
advantages: (1) salens are easily and efficiently synthesized in
stark contrast to porphyrins, which are typically obtained in yields
of less than 20%,16 and (2) the modular construction of salens
from diamines and salicylaldehydes enables easy tuning of catalyst
steric and electronic properties. We were further encouraged by
several recent reports of the catalytic nucleophilic ring opening
of epoxides using transition metal salen complexes17-19 and felt
that salen complexes could potentially be useful for the electro-
philic addition of CO2 to epoxides.
Our initial studies showed that la successfully catalyzes the
coupling of CO2 and propylene oxide (PO) in the presence of a
Lewis-basic co-catalyst such as (4-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP).
No reaction was observed in the absence of DMAP, which is
consistent with that observed for the Cr porphyrin-catalyzed
reaction.13 It is important to note that DMAP by itself did not
catalyze the reaction. Reaction 2 was run in 1:1 (v/v) mixtures
of PO and various co-solvents; however, running the reaction in
neat PO gave the best yield of propylene carbonate (PC). This
yield could be increased further by the addition of a small amount
of CH2Cl2, presumably to help solubilize the catalyst system
(Table 1, entries 4-5). Several (salen)Cr(lII) complexes (la-d)
with varying diamine backbones were investigated as catalysts
for reaction 2. Complex 1d exhibited the highest catalytic activity
of all the catalysts and is at least twice as active as the racemic
trans analogue lc (Table 1 entries 1-4). We believe this may be
due to the more accessible coordination site available in complex
1d. The trans-cyclohexyl salen catalyst la and the propylene salen
catalyst 1b are also slightly more active than 1c. Complex 1d
Herein, we report a new highly active (salen)Cr(III)-based
catalyst system for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from the
coupling of CO2 and terminal epoxides under extremely mild
conditions. Kruper et al. have previously reported the use of a
(1) Leitner, W. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1996, 155, 257-284.
(2) Behr, A. Carbon Dioxide ActiVation by Metal Complexes; VCH
Publishers: New York, 1988.
(3) Green Chemistry: Frontiers in Benign Chemical Syntheses and
Processes; Anastas, P. T., Williamson, T. C., Eds.; Oxford University Press:
New York, 1998.
(4) Darensbourg, D. J.; Holtcamp, M. W. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1996, 153,
155-174.
(5) Biggadike, K.; Angell, R. M.; Burgess, C. M.; Farrell, R. M.; Hancock,
A. P.; Harker, A. J.; Irving, A. J.; Irving, W. R.; Ioannou, C.; Procopiou, P.
A.; Shaw, R. E.; Solanke, Y. E.; Singh, O. M. P.; Snowden, M. A.; Stubbs,
R.; Walton, S.; Weston, H. E. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 19-21.
(6) Shaikh, A.-A. G.; Sivaram, S. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 951-976.
(7) Ratzenhofer, M.; Kisch, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 9, 317-
318.
(13) Kruper, W. J.; Dellar, D. D. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 725-727.
(14) Kruper et al. (ref 13) did not report precise conditions for their
reactions. Instead, they gave a range of conditions (i.e., 0.013-0.07 mol %
catalyst and 4-10 equiv co-catalyst, 60-100 °C, 730-780 psig, 18-64 h,
typically >95% yield).
(15) For the remainder of this article, the term salen will be used to describe
the general class of bis(salicylaldimine) ligands and complexes.
(16) Shanmugathasan, S.; Edwards, C.; Boyle, R. W. Tetrahedron 2000,
56, 1025-1046.
(8) Kihara, N.; Hara, N.; Harando, N. T. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6198-
6202.
(9) Kawanami, H.; Ikushima, Y. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2089-2090.
(10) Aida, T.; lnoue, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1304-1309.
(11) Kim, H. S.; Kim, J..; Kimee,. J. Lee, B. G.; Jung, O. S.; Jang, H. G.;
Kang, S. O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4096-4098.
(12) Yamaguchi, K.; Ebitani, K.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, H.;
Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4526-4527.
10.1021/ja0164677 CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/30/2001