active catalyst precursors for the reduction of ketones and
aldehydes in nonpolar organic solvents in the presence of
excess 2-propanol. The resulting in situ generated, simple
aluminum catalysts show higher activities than those of
previously reported complex aluminum systems.10,11 In
addition, they demonstrate the same high level of stereo-
selectivity for hydride transfer that has been attributed solely
to the elaborate ligand frameworks of reported catalysts.
Herein, we report a remarkably efficient catalytic MPV
reduction of carbonyl substrates using simple alkylaluminum
pre-catalysts. Our results suggest that the efficiency and the
selectivity of the Al-catalyzed MPV reaction does not depend
on the presence of elaborate ligands. Rather, they are strongly
affected by the aggregation state of the aluminum catalyst.
Classical MPV reduction of carbonyl substrates typically
proceeds quite reluctantly. For example, reduction of cyclo-
accomplished efficiently using a catalytic amount of a simple
aluminum alkyl precursor. Titration studies in C6D6 using
1H NMR spectroscopy have shown that AlMe3 is completely
converted to Al(OiPr)3 under similar conditions (rt, 2 h,
i
AlMe3 at 25 µM concentration and 10 equiv of PrOH).
However, as shown in Table 1, commercial Al(OiPr)3 shows
very little catalytic activity under the same conditions. The
main difference between the two Al alkoxides is that our in
situ generated Al(OiPr)3 is completely soluble in nonpolar
organic solvents while the commercial Al(OiPr)3 is not,
presumably due to a higher degree of aggregation. The
solubility of our in situ generated Al(OiPr)3 suggests that it
exists in a lower state of aggregation than commercial
Al(OiPr)3 (vide infra).
Barron, Interrante, and co-workers have reported that
dimethylaluminum alkoxides formed in solution from tri-
methylaluminum and alcohols exist at equilibrium as a
mixture of monomer, dimer, and trimer.13,14 Several other
groups have described the time-dependent changes in the
physical properties of aluminum alkoxides, including an
increase in the melting point of solid aluminum tris(alkoxide)
over time.15,16 This was attributed to an increase in aggrega-
tion of the aluminum complexes through bridging alkoxide
ligands. It has been postulated that only nonbridging alkoxy
groups are able to transfer hydrides to the carbonyl sub-
strates.8 Therefore, highly aggregated aluminum alkoxides
would be detrimental to MPV reduction. On the basis of this,
we attribute the remarkable efficiency of our catalytic MPV
reduction to a low aggregation state of the aluminum catalyst
where very few bridging alkoxides are present. The catalyst
can be maintained in a low aggregation state in dilute solution
for an extensive period. In fact, aging the trimethylaluminum/
iPrOH catalyst mixture for 6 days before the addition of
cyclohexanone gave only a 20% decrease in the overall yield.
i
hexanone in toluene with Al(OiPr)3 (10 mol %) and PrOH
(4 equiv) at room temperature gave cyclohexanol in only
7% yield after 12 h (Table 1, entry 1d). Under similar
Table 1. Catalytic MPV Reduction Using Simple
Alkylaluminum Reagents
Interestingly, the presence of a chloride ligand diminishes
the activity of AlMe2Cl for the MPV reduction of benz-
aldehyde (Table 1, entry 2b). After the first hour, the reaction
reaches a maximum yield of only 60% benzyl alcohol.
However, the reaction can be carried to completion in neat
iPrOH (Table 1, entry 2b′).
For aromatic aldehyde and ketone substrates, the AlMe2Cl
precatalyst tends to be less active than AlMe3 (Table 1,
entries 2a,b and 3a,b). However, AlMe2Cl demonstrates
significantly better activity than AlMe3 toward the reduction
of electron-rich ketones such as 2-pentanone (Table 1, entries
5a,b). Thermodynamically, 2-pentanone is a difficult sub-
strate for MPV reduction.4,17 The enhanced activity of
AlMe2Cl toward this substrate can be attributed to the
increased Lewis acidity18 of the aluminum center in
a Reaction conditions: Al pre-catalyst in 21 µM concentration, rt, N2.
conditions, other ketone and aldehyde substrates (acetophe-
none, benzaldehyde, and 2-pentanone) were similarly un-
reactive (Table 1, entries 2d, 4d, and 5d). Contrastingly, the
use of simple alkyl aluminum reagents (dimethylaluminum
chloride or trimethylaluminum) as pre-catalysts with iPrOH
(4 equiv) at room temperature produced primary and second-
ary alcohols in good yields within 2-12 h (Table 1, entries
1a,b-5a,b). The yield could also be increased by slightly
elevating the reaction temperature (Table 1, entry 4a′).
The results of Table 1 indicate for the first time that
catalytic MPV reduction of organic carbonyls can be
(13) Sauls, F. C.; Interrante, L. V.; Jiang, Z. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29,
2989-2996.
(14) Rogers, J. H.; Apblett, A. W.; Cleaver, W. M.; Tyler, A. N.; Barron,
A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1992, 3179-3187.
(15) Fieggen, W.; Gerding, H. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas. 1970, 89,
175-185.
(16) MacBeth, A. K.; Mills, J. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 2646.
(17) Adkins, H.; Cox, F. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 1151-1159.
(18) Paul, R. C.; Chandha, S. L.; Makhni, H. S. Indian J. Chem. 1971,
9, 365-367.
(12) Ooi, T.; Itagaki, Y.; Miura, T.; Maruoka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 2137-2138.
2392
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 15, 2001