7848 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 109, No. 35, 2005
Szalai et al.
However, it was shown in the experiments that, for high enough
values of S0, the propagation velocity can be reversed in the
vicinity of the bistability limit. To check this point without
undertaking too lengthly calculations, we have used a smaller
width w ) 0.3 mm to decrease the relaxation times, and a value
S0 ) 10-1 M. With these parameters the bistability limit is
located at R = 0.715. The shift to higher R (lower [OH-]0)
with decreasing width follows the experimental observations
(Figure 7). In the bistability domain, at R ) 0.73, state M still
invades state B with a propagation velocity equal to 1.27 ×
10-4 mm/s. However closer to the bistability limit the situation
is reversed, for R ) 0.72, state B invades state M at a velocity
equal to 6.1 × 10-5 mm/s.
Figure 9. Detail of the stability diagram given in Figure 8: limits of
the oscillatory domain.
Conclusion
This report confirms that the oscillatory and the excitability
properties of the CT reaction operated in an OSFR are induced
by long-range-activation instabilities. The interface dynamic of
standard bistable systems is recovered when the diffusivity of
the protonssthe activatory speciessis selectively and suf-
ficiently slowed. The addition of large enough amounts of poly-
(acrylate) ions can even make the system short range activated.
This is clearly shown to occur for concentrations of quasi
immobile carboxylic functions above 2 × 10-2 M. Note that
the different steps taken above: the characterization of a spatial
bistability domain, the search for conditions where the direction
of propagation of interfaces between the two spatial steady states
changes sign, and the development of effective short-range
activation are the first steps in a recently proposed systematic
method to produce stationary pulse patterns of one state
immersed into an other state (domain patterns). The final step
of the method is to study head-on collisions of spatial interfaces
in a range of parameters near to the values where the direction
of propagation of the spatial interface changes sign and search
for conditions where nonvanishing front pairing would form.
With this possibility in mind, we studied the collision dynamics
of spatial interfaces having slow positive velocities for a
concentration of acrylate function equal to 0.1 mol/dm3; the goal
was to observe stationary pulses of the B state localized in the
M state. Up to now, this quest is not successful. Beside the fact
that we have explored only a small range of possible feed
parameters, the bleaching of the color dye in the acid/base front,
makes the observation of a narrow region of the B state difficult.
Furthermore, a recent kinetic investigation31 shows that chloride
ions can play a secondary activatory role in the CT reaction.
The diffusivity of this species is not affected by the introduction
of poly(acrylate) and the slow head-on collisions of the spatial
state interfaces could not be prevented in these conditions. We
now continue the quest for stationary patterns in other pH-
activated systems, like the iodate-sulfite reaction, where we
expect to avoid the above difficulties.
At S0 ) 0, on decreasing R, the M state develops a small
domain of oscillations just before disappearing (Figure 9). In
the model, these oscillations were shown to result from the long-
range activation linked by the fast diffusion of H+ and have
been extensively discussed in ref 23. For the same reasons,
outside the bistability domain, the B state remains excitable over
a large domain of parameters (0.475 < R < 0.69). When the
complexing agent is introduced, the effective diffusion of H+
is divided by a factor σ ) 1 + S0/Ks.8 As a consequence, the
extent of the domains of oscillations and of excitability decrease
when S0 increases. These behaviors have totally vanished at S0
) 2 × 10-2 M. Numerical results are quantitatively consistent
with experimental determinations. In both cases, for S0 g 2 ×
10-2 M, the stability limit of the M state exhibits a remarkable
invariance as a function of S0. This surprising behavior can be
understood in the following way. On the basis of simple
arguments, it was previously shown24 that if the front of the M
state is sharp and a substrate (here OH-) is almost completely
transformed, the distance δ of this front to the CSTR boundary
is approximately given by the following relation:
DX
Q˙
δ
(9)
X is the concentration of the substrate at the feed-boundary, D
the diffusion coefficient of the driving species (here H+), and
Q˙ is the rate of consumption of the substrate. This distance does
not depend on the width w of the system. State M loses its
stability when w becomes of the same order as δ. When a certain
amount of complexing agent is added, the effective diffusion
D and the reaction rate Q˙ of the autocatalytic reaction are both
divided by the same factor σ. Thus, according to eq 9, δ remains
unchanged. It was checked during the computations that for a
given R the distance δ is independent of S0 and w provided
that S0 is large enough to avoid long-range activation effects.
Because δ only depends on R (through X) and for a given w M
loses stability when δ reaches a critical value (of order w), the
transition point does not depend on S0. This invariance is similar
to the result obtained by Pearson and Bruno9 for the threshold
of Turing structures. On the same basis, they show that this
threshold is independent of the concentration of the complexing
agent used to slow the diffusion of the activator. Obviously,
this does not infer that S0 has no effect on the dynamics.
Although the position of the transition is unchanged, the system
dynamics can be dramatically slowed and the concentration
profiles of the two different stable states are modified.
Acknowledgment. This research has been supported by a
Marie Curie Fellowship of the European Community program
Improving Human Potential under contract number HPMF-
CT-2002-011771. We thanks the support of the ESF “REAC-
TOR” program. I.S. expresses thanks for the support of the
Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS) (F049666, T0437473).
References and Notes
(1) Field, R. J., Burger, M., Eds. Oscillations and TraVeling WaVes in
Chemical Systems; Wiley: New York, 1985.
(2) Kapral, R., Showalter, K., Eds. Chemical Patterns and WaVes;
Kluwer Academic Publisher: Amsterdam, 1995.
Within the bistable domain and for low concentrations of the
binding agent, state M invades state B when these two states
are in contact; i.e., the M state is more stable than the B state.