G.-M. Dumitriu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25 (2015) 4447–4452
4449
N
C
COOH
H
N
X
X
N
A
X
N
(i)
(ii)
A
A
Lit. 17
A = bond, X = H
6
7
8
Lit. 17
9
A = bond, X = H
12 A = bond, X = H
13 A = S, X = H
14 A = S, X = Cl
A = S, X = H Lit. 16
Lit. 16
10 A = S, X = H
A = S, X = Cl
(iii)
Lit. 16
11 A = S, X = Cl Lit. 16
O
H
H
O
N
COOR1
O
O
O
N
COOH
N
R
R
O
X
N
A
X
N
A
X
N
A
(iv)
(v)
2a A = bond, X = H, R = CH2SH, R1 = Et 85%
2b A = S, X = H, R = CH2SH, R1 = Et 53%
Lit. 2
A = bond, X = H
3
4
5
1a A = bond, X = H, R = CH2SH 70%
1b A = S, X = H, R = CH2SH 90%
A = S, X = H Lit. 13
A = S, X = Cl 69%
2c A = bond, X = H, R = CH2CH2SCH3, R1 = Me 75%
2d A = S, X = H, R = CH2CH2SCH3, R1 = Me 91%
2e A = bond, X = H, R = CH2OH, R1 = Me 79%
2f A = S, X = H, R = CH2OH, R1 = Me 99%
1c A = bond, X = H, R = CH2CH2SCH3 84%
1d A = S, X = H, R = CH2CH2SCH3 85%
1e A = bond, X = H, R = CH2OH 78%
1f A = S, X = H, R = CH2OH 75%
1g A = bond, X = H, R = CH(CH3)2 92%
1h A = S, X = H, R = CH(CH3)2 80%
1i A = S, X = Cl, R = CH2CH2SCH3 82%
2g A = bond, X = H, R = CH(CH3)2, R1 = Me 80%
2h A = S, X = H, R = CH(CH3)2, R1 = Me 89%
2i A = S, X = Cl, R = CH2CH2SCH3, R1 = Me 97%
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) acrylonitrile, Triton B, 0 °C to reflux, 2 h; (ii) aqueous NaOH, MeOH, reflux, 15 h; (iii) 1.2 equiv N-hydroxysuccinimide, 1.2 equiv EDCI,
CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h; (iv) 1.2 equiv -cysteine ethyl ester hydrochloride, -methionine methyl ester hydrochloride, -serine methyl ester hydrochloride or -valine methyl ester
L
L
L
L
hydrochloride, 1.2 equiv triethylamine, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h; (v) 5 equiv NaOH 2 N, 80 °C, 2–5 h.
O
H
N
H
COOEt
O
O
N
O
O
N
COOEt
SH
N
S
N
S
S
COOEt
HN
O
N
S
N
S
(iv)
O
S
4
2b
2bd 43%
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (iv) 1.2 equiv L-cysteine ethyl ester hydrochloride, 1.2 equiv triethylamine, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h.
Table 1). This result is in accordance with previous reported studies
which highlight the phenothiazine nucleus as well tolerated bulky
unit for the A2 binding site of human farnesyltransferase.12,13,15
The 2-chloro substitution of the phenothiazine unit is tolerated,
but does not improve the activity. Thus, methionine compound
1i has similar FTase affinity as unsubstituted derivative 1d (e.g.,
was thus realized (Scheme 3 and Fig. 3). Since the 2-chloro substi-
tution of the phenothiazine unit in compound 1i did not result in
improved inhibitory properties (Fig. 3), the spacer variation was
realized only on compound 1d. However, the insertion of the tria-
zole unit in compound 20 and consequently, the increase of the
spacer length, was not tolerated and resulted in diminished biolog-
ical potency (e.g., compound 1d vs 20, Fig. 3). The three-carbon
atoms chain between the phenothiazine nitrogen and the amino
group from the aminoacid residue proved to be important for the
FTase inhibition.
compound 1i: IC50 (FTase) = 18.9 3.2
lM vs compound 1d: IC50
(FTase) = 11.7 0.9 M, Table 1). Therefore, this chemical modula-
l
tion was not envisaged in the cysteine, serine or valine series.
Moreover, carboxylic acids 1a–i showed superior inhibitory
potency compared to their ester analogues 2a–i (Table 1 and
Fig. 2). This highlights a better chelating power of the zinc cation
of the enzyme for carboxylic acids versus ethyl or methyl esters.
Similar tendency was previously observed in the FTase inhibitors
domain.12
The study of the nature of the aminoacid residue on the biolog-
ical properties revealed that in the carbazole series, the cysteine
and methionine analogues (e.g., carbazoles 1a and 1c, Table 1)
were more active than derivatives bearing a serine or a valine unit
(e.g., carbazoles 1e and 1g, Table 1). In the phenothiazine series,
cysteine derivative 1b was the best FTase inhibitor. Methionine
and serine analogues (compounds 1c and 1f, respectively) showed
slightly decreased activities and valine derivative 1h presented a
Farnesyltransferase structure24 was taken from the 1LD7 entry
of the RCSB Protein Data Bank.25 The crystallized inhibitor and
water molecules were removed to permit docking of the studied
compounds, built from the standard fragments library of Sybyl
6.9.126 with GOLD 5.1.27 Thirty solutions were generated and
classed through an in-house scoring function based on GoldScore27
and X-Score functions.28 The consistency of the results was
assessed by visually examining the conformation cluster.
Molecular docking was realized on the best candidates issued
from this study 1b, 1d, 1f and 1i (Fig. 4) in order to validate the
zinc-chelating potential of the free carboxylic acids and under-
stand the positioning and interactions of these molecules in the
active site of FTase.
modest activity (IC50 (FTase) = 44.7
l
M) (Table 1).
Phenothiazine derivative bearing a cysteine moiety 1b (Fig. 4
(a)) has a set of conformations placed on the same side and ori-
ented in the same direction in the active site of the protein and
with a score superior to serine derivative 1f. The carboxylic acid
is in a favorable position and interacts with the zinc atom of the
protein, a fact significant for FTase inhibitory properties.
In order to gain supplementary structure–activity relationships
in the current family of CaaX competitive inhibitors of human far-
nesyltransferase, modulations have been envisaged on the spacer
between the nitrogen atom from the phenothiazine unit and the
amide function. The insertion of a 1,2,3-triazole ring as a spacer