on Pd metal surface, in particular, in the coexistence of CD and
BA.8 In addition, Hahn et al. showed by DFT calculations with
Pt(111) that the adsorption energy of CN was very close to that
of CD.10 The mirror image correlation between CD- and
CN-modified Pd/C in Fig.2 prompts us to conclude that the
higher enantioselectivity of the CD-modified catalyst is not
ascribed to a higher surface coverage of CD than CN, but to a
higher enantio-differentiating ability of adsorbed CD. It is
suggested that the absolute configurations at C8 and C9 of
CD/CN primarily elucidate the enantiomer distribution.
Figure 2 shows the ee values as a function of the modifier
concentration for the PCA hydrogenation over QN- and
QD-modified Pd/C. With QN-modified Pd/C, enantioselectivity
becomes observable only at a concentration higher than 1 mM
(log[QN] = -3.0) and increases to 56%ee of the (S)-product as
the QN concentration increases to 30 mM (log[QN] = -1.6). A
plateau or maximum ee value was not attained because of
experimental limitations. With PCA hydrogenation over
modifier, the substrate, and hydrogen, these results lead us to
conclude again the similarity of the adsorption energies
between CD and CN and between QN and QD, with the former
set of the modifiers being more strongly adsorbed than the
latter one. However, there are noticeable differences between
PCA and DMPCA in the modifier concentrations where the
enantioselectivity becomes apparent and the maximum ee
values are attained; the enantioselectivity with DMPCA is
detected as low as 10-2-10-3 mM (log [modifier] = -6 ~ -5) of
CD/CN, 10 times lower concentration than PCA and the
maximum ee value is observed around 0.5 mM (log [CD/CN] =
-3.3) in contrast to 2 mM with PCA. The maximum ee value
with DMPCA is attained around 10 mM (log [modifier] = -2) of
QN/QD, while at > 30 mM with PCA. These findings are
interpreted by assuming weaker adsorption strength of DMPCA
on Pd/C than that of PCA due to steric hindrance of the
methoxy groups. It is considered that the weakened adsorption
strength of DMPCA induces more preferential interactions with
adsorbed chiral cinchona modifiers compared with Pd metal
surface. It is noted that the electron releasing effects from the
methoxy groups of DMPCA enhance the hydrogen bond
interactions between the modifier and the substrate,5 thereby
resulting in the higher enantioselectivity of DMPCA compared
to PCA, as suggested by Szöllösi.11
QD-modified Pd/C,
a mirror image correlation of the
QN-modified Pd/C is observed, although the ee value is very
limited (17 %ee of the (R)-product). At the regularly employed
concentration (2 mM), QN and QD resulted in very low ee
values (15% and 5%, respectively, with Pd/C), in agreement
with the literature.2 It is suggested from Fig.2 that these ee
values on QN/QD-modified Pd/C could be improved further if
higher modifier concentrations were achieved. The mirror
image correlation with QN/QD-modified Pd/C in Fig.2 shows
that the adsorption strength of the diastereomers on Pd metal
surface are very close each other and that the different ee
values attained are attributable to slightly different interaction
modes between the modifier and the substrate. It is considered
that the diastereomers, QN and QD, are adsorbed on Pd surface
in a tilted configuration via the N-lone pair of the quinoline
moiety with very close adsorption energies.
Comparing the ee value-modifier concentration mirror
image correlations in Fig.2 for the PCA hydrogenation over
CD/CN- and QN/QD-modified Pd/C, it is evident that the latter
set of modifiers generates enantio-differentiating ability and
reaches the plateau ee value at much higher modifier
concentrations than the former set of modifiers. It is considered
that this difference is resulted from the different adsorption
strength of the modifier between the two sets of the modifiers.
CD/CN is more strongly adsorbed on Pd surface with a parallel
geometry via π-electrons of the quinoline moiety than QN/QD
with a tilted configuration via the N-lone pair of the quinoline
moiety due to steric hindrance of 6-methoxy group. In a
dynamic adsorption equilibrium among the modifier, the
substrate, and hydrogen during the reaction, stronger adsorption
of the modifier results in a higher surface coverage of adsorbed
modifier to generate a higher enantio-differentiating ability
through more abundant interactions with the substrate, PCA, as
well as resulting in more extensive suppression of the
hydrogenation on unmodified sites or hydrogenation without
interactions with the modifier. Another difference among the
two sets of the modifiers is the maximum ee values attained. It
is considered that the parallel adsorption of CD/CN via
π-bonding of the quinoline moiety provides more favorable
configurations for enantio-differentiation in PCA-modifier
interaction intermediates than the tilted configuration of
QN/QD.
Figure 4. Product ee (%) as a function of the log of the modifier
concentration for the hydrogenation of PCA on Pd/C. The
modifiers used were (x) 6-hydorxy CD, (○) CD, and (□) QN.
The results with CD were recalculated from reference 3 for
comparison.
Another significant difference between PCA (Fig.2) and
DMPCA (Fig.3) resides in the maximum ee values achieved;
the maximum ee values of DMPCA are considerably higher
than those of PCA with all the modifiers examined here. It is
noted, in particular, that the ever highest ee values of 82% ee
and 42% ee are achieved for QN and QD, respectively, with the
enantioselective
QN/QD-modified Pd metal catalysts. On the basis of these
results, we presume that QN exhibits high intrinsic
hydrogenation
of
DMPCA
over
Figure 3 presents the dependences of the ee values on the
modifier concentration in the enantioselective hydrogenation of
DMPCA over the two sets of CD/CN- and QN/QD-modified
Pd/C. As shown in Fig.2 for the hydrogenation of PCA, two
sets of mirror image correlations are observed. Assuming a
dynamic equilibrium in competitive adsorption among the
a
stereo-controllability close to that of CD; however, the low
adsorption constant of QN is a decisive drawback. The
adsorption constant of QN/QD in common logarithm (log K)
should be lower approximately by 1.2–1.5 than that of CD/CN,