use. The use of metals (e.g., silver nitrate) to form insoluble
iodides leads to the precipitation of highly insoluble SB
270051 carboxylate salts. The most efficient process for
large-scale use was to oxidise the iodide and then to extract
out the resulting iodine. Small-scale studies identified a
number of suitable inorganic and organic oxidants although
some oxidants were also capable of oxidising SB 270051.
The most efficient way to remove iodide, with no loss of
SB 270051, was found to be treatment with excess hydrogen
peroxide at pH 5 (10 equiv to the amount of iodide known
to be present in solution). Under these operating conditions
the level of iodide could easily be reduced to 10 ppm or
less.
The need to use an excess of hydrogen peroxide was
driven by the kinetics of the iodide oxidation. At pH 5 the
rate of oxidation is slow, requiring an excess of peroxide to
drive the reaction to completion in a reasonable time (1-2
h). The use of stoichiometric hydrogen peroxide requires low
pH (∼1) or the use of metal catalysts such as molybdenum
or vanadium to get an acceptable reaction rate. SB 270051
is unstable in water below pH 5, and the removal of
molybdenum or vanadium salts was not considered an
attractive prospect. After removal of iodine, the aqueous
solution of SB 270051 had a hydrogen peroxide concentra-
tion of ∼2700 mg/L.
are widespread and used in many bulk industries and
healthcare products, for example, food stuffs, treating
peroxide waste after paper bleaching, and contact lens
cleaning. In recent years, a number of instances of the use
of catalase enzymes to remove hydrogen peroxide (formed
as the reduction product of oxygen) from reactions producing
pharmaceutical intermediates have been reported.7-9
Thus, catalase enzymes presented themselves as poten-
tially useful biocatalysts to remove hydrogen peroxide from
aqueous solutions of SB 270051 after iodide removal. A
range of commercially available catalases was tested, with
mixed results. The use of bovine catalase was ruled out for
obvious reasons. In small-scale screening tests, some catalase
preparations did destroy peroxide in crude reaction mixtures,
but large amounts had to be added. The most promising
catalases identified were from the organisms Aspergillus
niger and Corynebacterium glutamicum. These are both
available on a large scale, in high purity, and are from
nonmammalian sources. The catalase was simply added
directly to the aqueous SB 270051 solution and stirred at 25
°C until the residual peroxide level had dropped to below
10 ppm. The solution could then be directly hydrogenated.
When this was scaled up in the pilot plant, several deficien-
cies became apparent. After an initial reaction, gas evolution
would cease before all the peroxide had been consumed. The
reaction could be restarted by the addition of fresh enzyme,
which indicates a problem with the stability or inhibition of
the enzyme in this reaction mixture. If too much enzyme is
added, however, this led to a retardation of the rate of the
subsequent reduction step. This is an inherent problem with
the application of a soluble protein that can interfere with
the metal catalyst. The aqueous SB 270051 solution would
need to be ultrafiltered to remove any protein prior to
hydrogenation, but this would add an extra process step to
the synthesis. All of these problems arise from the use of
soluble enzymes in such a processes.
A number of immobilised catalase preparations have been
reported, but most could be ruled out for various reasons.
The most attractive carrier for the protein that would be
compatible with large-scale batch processing was a Eupergit
type (macroporous acryate beads).10 The catalase enzymes
of choice could be easily attached, by covalent bonding, to
Eupergit C250L, a support containing oxirane functionalities
that react with various groups on the protein.11 Two other
supports, Eupergit C and cyanogen bromide-activated
Sepharose were also used to support the catalase but were
not progressed on the basis of cost, activity, and stability
comparisons. Mixing a solution of catalase with the support
at ambient temperature gave at least a 98% attachment of
protein. Although binding was effective in a few hours, the
protein was mixed with the resin for 72 h, resulting in a
Since the aqueous feedstock of SB 270051 was subse-
quently charged to a hydrogenation reaction, the excess
hydrogen peroxide first had to be reduced to less than 1 mg/L
for safety reasons.
Removal of Hydrogen Peroxide. Our initial strategy was
to add inorganic reducing agents such as sodium metabisul-
phite or sodium sulphite. These quickly destroyed peroxide,
but sulphur residues made the resulting solutions very
difficult to hydrogenate.
The use of low-valent metal salts such as stannous
chloride was also deemed unattractive. The process that was
first scaled-up used palladium-on-carbon as a catalyst to
decompose the excess peroxide to oxygen and water. The
amount of catalyst and temperature (65-70 °C) were
adjusted to give a smooth gas evolution that could be diluted
with nitrogen and safely vented.
One peculiar aspect of aqueous SB 270051 is that
solutions at ca. neutral pH have the tendency to crystallise
when heated. If this occurred during the reaction, the resulting
solid coated the catalyst, and the reaction ceased. To ensure
that SB 270051 remained in solution during the peroxide
destruction, the aqueous solution had to be diluted with
2-propanol (IPA) prior to addition of the Pd catalyst. Whilst
this procedure worked and was scaled-up, it was not ideal
having an organic solvent mixture heated with an inhomo-
geneous Pd catalyst in the presence of oxygen. Hence, we
decided to look for a safer, more environmentally friendly
way to remove excess peroxide.
(7) Leise, A.; Seelbach, K.; Wnndrey, C. Industrial Biotransformations; Wiley-
VCH: New York, 2000.
(8) Waldemar, A.; Lazarus, M.; Boss, B.; Saha-Moller, C. R.; Humpf, H.-U.;
Schreier, P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7841.
(9) Cabri, W.; Verga, R.; Cambiaghi, S.; Bernasconi, E. Chim. Ind. (Milan)
1999, 81, 461.
(10) Seip, J. E.; Fager, S. K.; Gavagan, J. E.; Anton, D. L.; Cosimo, R. D.
Bioinorg. Med. Chem. 1994, 2, 371.
Enzymic Destruction of Hydrogen Peroxide. Catalase
enzymes (EC 1.11.1.6) are used by living systems to break
down hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen.6 Catalases
(6) Boyer, P. D., Ed. The Enzymes XIII, Part C; Academic Press: New York,
(11) Katchalski-Katzir, E.; Kraemer, D. M. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2000, 10,
157.
1976.
506
•
Vol. 6, No. 4, 2002 / Organic Process Research & Development