(401 nm) contrasts markedly with the expectation that the dimeric
[Au(CN)2]2 has a larger HOMO–LUMO gap than that of the
polymeric [Au(CN)2]‘6a,b This peculiar feature might be related to
the formation of side-by-side infinite chains composed of Au(CN)2
dimers via HMI cations through hydrogen bonds. A similar
result was obtained for [2,29-(1,2-ethanediyl)bis(4,5-dihydro-1H-
imidazolinium)][Au(CN)2]2, which contains adjacent Au(CN)2
luminescent at RT regardless of their aggregation forms strongly
suggests that a significant fraction of Au(CN)2 anions assemble
to form ion pairs and/or ion aggregation in the liquids.
Understanding the oligomeric species should permit the lumines-
cence feature seen in this work to be developed into a non-volatile
luminescent liquid.
This work was in part supported by a COE Research
on Elements Science (No. 12CE2005) and a Grant-in-Aid
(21st Century COE program on Kyoto University Alliance for
Chemistry) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology, Japan. The authors also acknowledge the
financial support from the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(No. 15205019) by JSPS.
…
˚
dimers with an Au Au distance of 3.33 A connected through
the dications, and displays an emission band with a maximum at
430 nm.8d
Liquids 3–5 also display an emission at RT (blue–green for 3,
and blue for 4 and 5), but their intensities are significantly weak in
comparison with those of crystals 1 and 2, by a factor of 102–103.
A previous report on luminescent RT ionic liquid was limited to
the (CF3SO2)2N salt of the PAMAM dendrimer,12 whereas there
have been several luminescent behavior studies of pyrene and its
derivatives13 or lanthanide compounds14 dissolved in non-
luminescent ionic liquids. Fig. 3(c)–(e) show the emission and
excitation spectra of the three kinds of liquids at RT. In contrast to
the spectra of crystals 1 and 2, there are two distinct emissions,
one with a maximum at 376–390 nm and the other at around
450–470 nm. The relative intensities of these two emission bands
depend on the excitation wavelength. The spectra consisting of two
distinct bands resemble those obtained for K[Au(CN)2] in
methanol frozen solution at 77 K,6c and [(C6H11NC)2Au](PF6)5
and [{C(NHMe)2}2Au](PF6)?0.5(acetone)15 frozen solutions of a
variety of organic solvents at 77 K. Systematic variation in
concentration of the K[Au(CN)2] solution reveals that the high
energy band is readily assigned to oligomeric species including a
small number of Au(CN)2 anions such as dimer, trimer and
tetramer, since the band definitely weakens as the concentration
increases. In contrast, the low energy band might originate from
the larger [Au(CN)2]n oligomers, since extended Hu¨ckel calcula-
tions predict that the HOMO–LUMO gap of [Au(CN)2]n
oligomers decreases as the n value increases.6a,b Upon freezing,
salts 3–5 display intense luminescence with a maximum at
440–455 nm (Fig. 3(f) for 5), which is comparable to the
wavelength of the low energy band observed at RT. This result
provides us with further confirmation that the low energy bands
originate from the extended chain structures. For BMI-based ionic
liquids formed with PF6, BF4, (CF3SO2)2N and so on, Watanabe
and coworkers reported that the molar conductivity estimated
from impedance measurements is significantly low in comparison
with that estimated on the basis of pulsed-field-gradient spin-
echo NMR measurements, indicating ion association and/or
ion pairs of a significant fraction of oppositely charged ions.16
At present, the number of Au(CN)2 units in the oligomeric
species in 3–5 is unclear. However, it is entirely reasonable that
there are more than two distinct species in the ion associations,
and the smaller oligomers disappear upon freezing. The similarity
in the RT emission and excitation spectra seen for 3–5 suggests
that the oligomeric species found in the liquids are similar to
each other.
Notes and references
¯
{ Crystal data for 1: C6H7N4Au1. M = 332.12, triclinic, space group P1,
˚
a = 6.915(1), b = 7.014(2), c = 10.590(2) A, a = 100.18(2), b = 97.31(2),
c = 117.66(2)u, V = 434.7(2) A , Z = 2, dcalc = 2.538 g cm23, m(MoKa) =
3
˚
16.9 mm21, 2219 measured, 1355 independent reflections, R = 0.056 (F2 ¢
4s(F2)), wR = 0.195 (all data). Crystal data for 2: C8H11N4Au1. M =
360.17, monoclinic, space group P21/c, a = 8.370(2), b = 19.900(4), c =
6.672(2) A, b = 107.84(2)u, V = 1057.9(4) A , Z = 4, dcalc = 2.261 g cm23
,
3
˚
˚
m(MoKa) = 13.8 mm21, 2426 measured, 1690 independent reflections, R =
0.043 (F2 ¢ 4s(F2)), wR = 0.131 (all data). CCDC reference numbers
280734 and 280735. For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic
format see DOI: 10.1039/b515869a
1 (a) M. Meln´ınk and R. V. Parish, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1986, 70, 157; (b)
H. Schmidbaur, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, 391.
2 (a) R. Blonder, S. Levi, G. Tao, I. Ben-Dov and I. Willner, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 10467; (b) M. A. Mansour, W. B. Connick,
R. J. Lachicotte, H. J. Gysling and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1998, 120, 1329; (c) M. O. Wolf and M. A. Fox, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1995, 117, 1845.
3 (a) P. Pyykko¨, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 597; (b) H. Schmidbaur, Gold Bull.,
2000, 33, 3.
4 (a) H. Schmidbaur, W. Graf and G. Mu¨ller, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1988, 27, 417; (b) D. E. Harwell, M. D. Mortimer, C. B. Knobler,
F. A. L. Anet and M. F. Hawthorne, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
2679.
5 R. L. White-Morris, M. M. Olmstead and A. L. Balch, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 1033.
6 (a) M. A. Omary and H. H. Patterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
7696; (b) M. A. Rawashdeh-Omary, M. A. Omary and H. H. Patterson,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 10371; (c) M. A. Rawashdeh-Omary,
M. A. Omary, H. H. Patterson and J. P. Fackler, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 11237.
7 (a) N. Nagasundaram, G. Roper, J. Biscoe, J. W. Chai, H. H. Patterson,
N. Blom and A. Ludi, Inorg. Chem., 1986, 25, 2947; (b) P. Fischer,
A. Ludi, H. H. Patterson and A. W. Hewat, Inorg. Chem., 1994,
33, 62.
8 (a) A. H. Schwellnus, L. Denner and C. A. Boeyens, Polyhedron, 1990,
9, 975; (b) R. E. Cramer, D. W. Smith and W. VanDoorne, Inorg.
Chem., 1998, 37, 5895; (c) M. Stender, M. M. Olmstead, A. L. Balch,
D. Rios and S. Attar, Dalton Trans., 2003, 4282; (d) C. Paraschiv,
S. Ferlay, M. W. Hosseini, V. Bulach and J.-M. Planeix, Chem.
Commun., 2004, 2270; (e) W. Dong, Y.-Q. Sun, B. Yu, H.-B. Zhou,
H.-B. Song, Z.-Q. Liu, Q.-M. Wang, D.-Z. Liao, Z.-H. Jiang, S.-P. Yan
and P. Cheng, New J. Chem., 2004, 28, 1347.
9 (a) M. C. Buzzeo, R. G. Evans and R. G. Compton, ChemPhysChem,
2004, 5, 1106; (b) C. Chiappe and D. Pieraccini, J. Phys. Org. Chem.,
2005, 18, 275.
In conclusion, we prepared five dicyanoaurate(I) salts with a
wide variation in their mode of aggregation such as dimer, infinite
chain and liquid forming. The 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium
10 A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 441.
11 S. S. Pathaneni and G. R. Desiraju, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993,
319.
12 J. -F. Huang, H. Luo, C. Liang, I. -W. Sun, G. A. Baker and S. Dai,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 12784.
…
cations are prone to elongate the Au Au separation, and the
expansion of the alkyl chain in the cations gives rise to the
stabilization of the liquid state. The finding that all present salts are
13 For examples: (a) P. Bonhoˆte, A. -P. Dias, M. Armand,
N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram and M. Gra¨tzel, Inorg.
726 | J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 724–727
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006