466
R. Kamakshi and B. S. R. Reddy
Typical Reaction Procedure for 2a
1.432
1.100
[bmim]+Cl− (1 mL) was placed in a 25 mL round-bottom flask
equipped with a stirrer bar, and InCl3 (2.5 mg), 4-nitrobenzoic acid
(167 mg, 1 mmol), and 2-aminoethan-1-ol (61 mg, 1 mmol) were added.
The resulting mixture was stirred at 60◦C for 3 h and then cooled.
Distilled water (20 mL) was added and the pale yellow precipitate
was filtered off. The precipitate formed was sufficiently pure and was
charged onto a column containing silica gel (60–120 mesh) and eluted
with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (50:50 v/v). The product obtained
was analyzed using FTIR, 1H, and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and mass
spectrometry.
1.992
1.530
ꢂE ꢃ 65.7 kcal molꢁ1
Transition state
Spectroscopic Data for the Compounds 1a–10a
2-Phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 1a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1647, 1499. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 3.74 (t, 2H),
4.2 (t, 2H), 7.29–7.5 (m, 5H, Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3) 41, 59, 124,
128.5, 131.7, 134, 167. m/z 147 (M+), 119.5, 105.
Fig. 1. Optimized geometry of a feasible transition state.
liquids are generally very high. Hydrogen-bonding effects
are also noted in certain cases wherein the reactions are aug-
mented and rendered viable in the presence of a solvent with
hydrogen-bonding capability. The hydrogen-bonding effects
in ionic liquids have been studied in the Diels–Alder reac-
tion for acrylates and it was found that the reactions were
more feasible and selective in ionic liquids due to these
effects.[18] Such hydrogen-bonding interactions, if prevalent,
wouldgreatlyincreasethenucleophilicityoftheaminegroup,
thus rendering it more effective.
An insight for the energy constraints for the reaction to
occur can be obtained from the gas-phase calculations of
step 1 of the reaction. The analysis of the reaction shows
that the activation energy required for the formation of the
amide with the removal of water through a concerted mecha-
nism (Scheme 2) is very high, of the order of 65.7 kcal mol−1
(Fig. 1). However, this is not the exact energy barrier that
needs to be surmounted: the presence of solvent would
considerably lower the energy barrier. However, the reac-
tion requires refluxing in chlorobenzene at a temperature of
120◦C to yield 50% of the product. Since the reaction takes
place at ambient temperature, in the presence of an ionic liq-
uid, it may be suggested that the ionic liquid stabilizes the
reaction due to its Coulombic interactions.
2-(4-Nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 2a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 730, 1599, 1612. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 3.68 (t,
2H), 3.51 (t, 2H), 8.26 (m, 2H), 8.34 (m, 2H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3)
42.8, 61.7, 134.1, 127.2, 145.1, 169. m/z 192.6 (M+).
2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 3a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1566, 1642, 3411br, s. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 3.8
(t, 2H), 4.2 (t, 2H), 7.37–7.7 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 8.1 (s, 1H). δC (125 MHz,
CDCl3) 43.3, 63.2, 129.4, 132.3, 153.7, 162.4. m/z 163 (M+).
2-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 4a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1607, 1577, 765, 2855. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 2.3
(s, 6H), 3.65 (t, 2H), 4.1 (t, 2H), 7.1–7.4 (m, 3H Ar-H). δC (125 MHz,
CDCl3) 19.7, 20.13, 47.1, 51.6, 127.8, 128.7, 129.6, 134.4, 157.3. m/z
175 (M+).
4-Ethyl-2-(phenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 5a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1522, 1620. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 0.98 (t, 3H),
1.4 (m, 2H), 3.3 (m, 1H), 3.54 (dd, 1H), 3.68 (dd, 1H), 7.1–7.7 (m, 5H,
Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3) 21, 30, 42, 60.8, 127, 134, 145, 167. m/z
175 (M+).
4-Ethyl-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 6a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 727, 1566, 1622. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 1.01 (t,
3H), 1.6 (m, 2H), 3.3 (m, 1H), 3.54 (dd, 1H), 3.68 (dd, 1H), 8.1–8.24
(m, 4H, Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3) 21, 30, 42, 60.8, 127, 134, 145,
167. m/z 220 (M+).
Conclusions
A novel and an environmentally friendly method for the syn-
thesis of 2-oxazolines promoted by ionic liquids has been
described. Itwasfoundthatindiumchlorideisabettercatalyst
than other Lewis acids.The yields are good and the procedure
offers products that can be purified with considerable ease.
2-Phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazine 7a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1626, 1580. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 2.3 (t, 2H),
3.4 (m, 2H), 3.7 (m, 2H), 7.1–7.8 (m, 5H, Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3)
27.1, 38, 58.5, 122, 126, 130.3, 132, 164. m/z 161 (M+).
Experimental
Materials and Methods
2-(4-Nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazine 8a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1588, 1630. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 2.7 (m, 2H),
3.6 (m, 2H), 3.9 (m, 2H), 8.24–8.3 (m, 4H,Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3)
19.1, 40.2, 61.8, 126, 133, 145, 165. m/z 206 (M+).
1-Methylimidazole, butyl chloride, and indium chloride were purchased
from Aldrich. The aminoethanols were obtained from Fluka Chemi-
cals. N-Methylimidazole was quaternized with 1-chlorobutane to form
1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride under reflux. A similar proce-
dure was adopted for the synthesis of 1-pentyl-3-methylimidazolium
chloride ([pmim]+Cl−) and 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride
([hmim]+Cl−) using the respective chloroalkanes. Analytical thin-layer
chromatography was performed on pre-coated plastic silica gel plates
of 0.25 mm thickness containing PF 254 indicator (Merck). IR spec-
tra were recorded neat on a Perkin Elmer RX I FTIR spectrometer. 1H
and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in [D4]methanol on a 500 MHz
JEOL spectrometer (chemical shifts in δ, ppm) using tetramethylsilane
as an internal standard. Mass analysis was performed on a JEOL mass
analyzer.
4,4-Dimethyl-2-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 9a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 1567, 1602. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 1.27 (s, 6H),
3.7 (s, 2H), 7.2–7.9 (m, 5H, Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3) 12.3, 35.2,
46, 124, 126.3, 129, 132, 164. m/z 160 (M+).
4,4-Dimethyl-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3-oxazole 10a
νmax (KBr)/cm−1 716, 1577, 1607. δH (500 MHz, CDCl3) 1.3 (s,
6H), 3.8 (s, 2H), 8.15–8.26 (m, 4H, Ar-H). δC (125 MHz, CDCl3) 27,
43.3, 62.5, 128, 135, 162. m/z 220 (M+).