1
396
J. Zhang et al.
LETTER
(5) For reviews, see: (a) Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. J. Synth.
With these results in hand, we examined the scope of the
reaction and obtained a variety of the expected pinacol–
substituted phenylboronates in moderate to good yields
Org. Chem. Jpn. 1999, 57, 503. (b) Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura,
N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 611, 392. (c) Miyaura, N. In
Catalytic Heterofunctionalization; Togni, A.; Grützmacher,
H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Chichester, 2001, Chap. 3.
1
4
under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 2).
All of the reactions were completed within six hours and
afforded the desired pinacol arylboronates. Moreover
present reaction rules of the steric and electronic effects
were in agreement with results reported which using aryl-
diazonium salts as borylation material.9 The meta- and
para-substituted aryldiazonium salts favored the reaction
while ortho-substituted aryldiazonium salts gave only
lower yields (Table 2, entry 8). Substrates with electron-
withdrawing groups showed better reactivity than elec-
tron-donating groups did. But the electronic effect might
play a dominant role in the case of pinacol 3-nitro-5-meth-
ylphenyl boronate (Table 2, entry 9). Finally, it was worth
noting that substrates bearing bromo and aminosulfonyl
substituents could also be employed in this reaction af-
fording moderate yields (Table 2, entries 2 and 10).
(6) (a) Murata, M.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. J. Org. Chem.
1
997, 62, 6458. (b) Murata, M.; Oyama, T.; Watanbe, S.;
Masuda, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 164. (c) Baudoin, O.;
Guénard, D.; Guéritte, F. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9268.
(
d) Broutin, P. E.; Cerna, I.; Campaniello, M.; Leroux, F.;
–11
Colobert, F. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4419. (e) Murata, M.;
Sambommatsu, T.; Watanabe, S.; Masuda, Y. Synlett 2006,
1867.
(7) (a) Brown, H. C.; Srebnik, M.; Cole, T. E. Organometallics
1
986, 5, 2300. (b) Brown, H. C.; Cole, T. E.
Organometallics 1983, 2, 1316.
(
8) (a) Fürstner, A.; Seidel, G. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 541. (b) Zhu,
L.; Duquette, J.; Zhang, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3729.
(c) Giroux, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 233.
(
d) Billingsley, K.; Barder, T. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5359.
(9) Willis, M. D.; Strongin, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
683.
8
In conclusion, we have developed a new procedure, which
is compatible with green chemistry principles, for the syn-
thesis of arylboronates. Putative advantages over the
known methodology include: 1) providing direct access to
arylboronates bearing halo and acidic substituents; 2)
mild conditions and using water as solvent; and 3) a cata-
lytic amount of Cu(I) salt additive reduces the metal con-
tamination. Though the negative effect from steric
hindrance can reduce the scope of the method, we believe
that this protocol is a useful addition to known procedures
for arylboronate synthesis.
(
10) Ma, Y. D.; Song, C.; Jiang, W.; Xue, G. P.; Cannon, F. J.;
Wang, X. M.; Andrus, B. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4635.
(11) Mo, F. Y.; Jiang, Y. B.; Qiu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. B.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1846.
(
12) General Procedure for the Synthesis of 1a–n
A solution of aromatic amines (20 mmol) in HCl (6 mL) in
a flask was cooled to 0 °C and diazotized with 1.42 g (22
mmol) of NaNO . The temperature must be kept below 5 °C.
2
After 15 min, the ice-cold solution of NaBF was rapidly
4
poured into the flask, which had been cooled below 0 °C.
The temperature should remain below 5 °C. Powerful
stirring was required to agitate the thick magma at this stage.
After 30 min stirring, the solid was filtered with Büchner
funnels. The crystal of aryldiazonium salts was washed with
iced H O, with MeOH, and with commercial Et O.
Acknowledgment
2
2
(
(
13) Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 2942.
14) General Procedure for the Synthesis of 2a–n
Financial support was received from the Natural Science Foundati-
on of Jiangshu Province (BK2011813).
Aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate salts (2 mmol) and B pin2
2
(
2 mmol) were resolved in MeCN (6 mL) and H O (3 mL).
2
After the solution was clear, CuBr (0.1 mmol) was added.
The resulting reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 5–6 h
at r.t. The solution was then concentrated under reduced
References
(
1) For reviews, see: (a) Suzuki, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15,
78. (b) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 2457.
1
pressure. The residue was diluted with brine. The H
was extracted with EtOAc several times. The combined
organic layer was dried over anhyd Na SO and concen-
2
O layer
(c) Miyaura, N. Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 219, 11.
(d) Miyaura, N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2008, 81, 1535.
(e) Miyaura, N. Synlett 2009, 2039.
2
4
trated under reduced pressure. The crude product was
(
2) (a) Beveridge, R. E.; Fernando, D.; Gerstenberger, B. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 5, 5005. (b) Collman, J. P.; Zhong,
M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1233.
purified on silica gel by flash column chromatography with
EtOAc and hexane.
1
Compound 2a: H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
): δ = 1.39 (s, 12
3
(3) Xu, J. M.; Wang, X. Y.; Shao, C. W.; Su, D. Y.; Cheng,
G. L.; Hu, Y. F. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1964.
H, CH ), 7.93 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H, HAr), 8.12 (d, J = 8.1 Hz,
2 H, HAr). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 248 (2.8) [M ], 233 (57.3),
3
+
(4) Andaloussi, M.; Lindh, J.; Savmarker, J.; Sjöberg, P. J. R.;
Larhed, M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 13069.
162 (57.9), 149 (100), 148 (24.9), 85 (10.9), 43 (10.1).
Synlett 2012, 23, 1394–1396
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York