water, and finally left to dry in a dust-free environment prior to
use. All samples were vacuum centrifuged to complete dryness
and digested in acid using the following procedure before analysis.
The redissolved digests were diluted accordingly with 1% nitric
acid and their lanthanide contents analyzed by monitoring m/z
139, 158, and 174 for 139La, 158Gd, 174Yb, respectively. Samples
were analyzed in the ‘peak jump’ mode and all signals corrected
according to the internal 115In standard. Interference corrections
for 158Gd were made by monitoring Dy at m/z 161.
appropriately with an aqueous 20% hexamethylenetetramine
buffer. Presence of free Ln(III) ions were confirmed by the
immediate appearance of a red colour in the solution upon the
addition of xylenol orange sodium salt.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Elena Polishchuk and Candice Martins for help with
MTT assays, Drs M. J. Abrams and G. J. Bridger for discussions,
Dr W. R. Cullen and Vivian W.-M. Lai for their expertise in acid
digestion technique and for the use of their equipment, and Bert
Mueller for help with the ICP-MS. We acknowledge support from
theNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Councilof Canada
and a University Graduate Fellowship (CAB) at the University of
British Columbia.
Acid digestion for ICP-MS analysis
Dried samples (vacuum centrifugation) were dissolved in 2 mL of
Seastar concentrated nitric acid. Samples were transferred to test
tubes with two or three Teflon boiling chips and placed in a block
heater (Standard Heatblock, VWR Scientific Products). The tem-
perature was slowly raised to 105 ◦C over 1 h and then maintained
at 105 ◦C for 24 h. Approximately 2 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide
(Fisher Scientific) was added to each sample before heating at
140 ◦C for 24 h. The temperature was increased to 150 ◦C and
samples were evaporated to dryness. Subsequently, samples were
redissolved in 3 mL of 10% nitric acid and stored in 4 mL high
density polyethylene bottles (Wheaton, Milville, NJ) at 4 ◦C.
References
1 Government of Canada; http://www.biobasics.gc.ca/english/View.
asp?x = 770, (accessed Jan. 11, 2007).
2 K. F. Mauck and B. L. Clarke, Mayo Clin. Proc., 2006, 81, 662.
3 D. W. Dempster and R. Lindsay, Lancet, 1993, 341, 797.
4 M. T. McDermott, C. Zapalowski and P. D. Miller, Osteoporosis,
Hanley & Belfus, Toronto, ON, 2004, p 1-168.
5 J. N. Fordham, Osteoporosis, Churchill Livingstone, Toronto, 2004,
p 223.
Ligand analysis by UV-Vis Assay
6 M. A. Karsdal and C. Christiansen, Future Rheum., 2006, 1, 683.
7 P. J. Marie, Bone, 2006, 38, S10.
A calibration curve consisting of appropriate concentrations
of dissolved ligand in 0.9% physiological saline solution was
constructed for Hma, Hema and Hdpp at kmax = 273, 279, 275 nm,
respectively. The undigested supernatants from La(ma)3, Eu(ma)3,
Gd(ma)3, Tb(ma)3, Yb(ma)3 La(ema)3, and La(dpp)3–HA binding
studies for all four time points were diluted 100 fold with 0.9%
physiological saline solution. The concentration of ligand in
solution was calculated by comparing the absorbances collected
from the supernatant solutions to the previously constructed
calibration curves. High concentration of the ligand in solution
indicates dissociation of the LnL3 complex upon HA binding.
Percent ligand in solution was determined by dividing the ligand
concentration determined in the supernatant by the total ligand
concentration added.
8 S. C. Verberckmoes, M. E. D. Broe and P. C. D’Haese, Kidney Int.,
2003, 64, 534.
9 E. Pidcock and G. R. Moore, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem., 2001, 6, 479.
10 T. J. Webster, E. A. Massa-Schlueter, J. L. Smith and E. B. Slamovich,
Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 2111.
11 D. Nigel, W. Joseph and D. Michael, World Patent, WO 02/00227 A2,
2002.
12 P. Caravan, J. J. Ellison, T. J. McMurry and R. B. Lauffer, Chem. Rev.,
1999, 99, 2293.
13 I. Kostova, Curr. Med. Chem., 2005, 5, 591.
14 N. Sabbatini, M. Guardigli and J.-M. Lehn, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1993,
123, 201.
15 S. P. Fricker, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 524.
16 D. Nayak and S. Lahiri, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 1999, 242, 423.
17 W. A. Volkert and T. J. Hoffman, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2269.
18 M. A. Santos, M. Gil, L. Gano and S. Chaves, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.,
2005, 10, 564.
19 M. A. Santos, S. Gama, L. Gano, G. Cantinho and E. Farkas, Dalton
Trans., 2004, 3772.
20 D. M. J. Doble, M. Melchior, B. O’Sullivan, C. Sierring, J. Xu, V. C.
Pierre and K. N. Raymond, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 4930.
21 M. M. Jones, J. J. Molenda, T. P. Hanusa and M. W. Voehler, J. Inorg.
Biochem., 1996, 62, 127.
Eu(ma)3 and Tb(ma)3 analysis by fluorescence assay
A calibration curve over a range of concentrations was constructed
by integrating the area under the most intense fluorescence
peak (kem = 641 for Tb(ma)3 and 642 nm for the Eu(ma)3)
and plotted against the known concentration. Concentrations of
the complexes in solution were determined by comparing their
integrated area under the most intense fluorescence peak against
the calibration curve. Percent Ln(III) bound was determined
by subtracting the amount of Tb(III) or Eu(III) found in the
supernatant from the total amount of Ln(III) added to the sample.
This value was then divided by the total ligand concentration.
22 A. E. V. Gordon, J. Xu, K. N. Raymond and P. W. Durbin, Chem. Rev.,
2003, 103, 4207.
23 K. H. Thompson, C. A. Barta and C. Orvig, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35,
545.
24 R. C. Hider and T. Zhou, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 2005, 1054, 141.
25 Z. D. Liu and R. C. Hider, Med. Res. Rev., 2002, 22, 26.
26 R. A. Yokel, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 228, 97.
27 M. A. Santos, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 228, 187.
28 Titan Pharmaceuticals Inc., http://www.titanpharm.com/pt-gallium.
html, (accessed Jan 2006).
29 D. J. Clevette and C. Orvig, Polyhedron, 1990, 9, 151.
30 Z. Zhang, D. M. Lyster, G. A. Webb and C. Orvig, Nucl. Med. Biol.,
1992, 19, 327.
31 D. E. Green, C. L. Ferreira, R. V. Stick, B. O. Patrick, M. J. Adam and
C. Orvig, Bioconjugate Chem., 2005, 16, 1597.
32 M. A. Barrand, B. A. Callingham and R. C. Hider, J. Pharm.
Pharmacol., 1987, 39, 203.
Xylenol orange assay
Approximately 20 mg of proligand, HA, LnL3, Ln(NO3)3, solid
samples from the metal–HA binding studies as well as the
supernatant from the same experiment were dissolved in minimal
amounts of 6 M HCl. The pH was adjusted to 5 and diluted
33 M. A. Barrand, R. C. Hider and B. A. Callingham, J. Pharm.
Pharmacol., 1990, 42, 279.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Dalton Trans., 2007, 5019–5030 | 5029
©